• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Power mods and engine ?'s

  • Thread starter Thread starter loudstang
  • Start date Start date Jul 26, 2011
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
K

KhanTyranitar

Member
Apr 21, 2011
93
1
9
Sep 6, 2011
#21
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #21
error, somehow double posted.
 
D

David19d

New Member
Aug 25, 2011
15
0
0
Sep 6, 2011
#22
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #22
Wow. I just read this whole long winded argument on converters. Wow.

If you want power out of your 2.3, ditch the entire exhaust. It sucks. Get a decent header from Speedway, Racer Walsh, or Schofield, take the car to the nearest muffler shop and get a decent 2.25 set up on it. If you want it to look neat get someones old lx tail pipes and have a y pipe installed to make it duals. DO NOT GET FLOWMASTERS, they sound like crap on a 4cyl. I have one and hate it.

Depending on the intake manifold, your wallet and your mechanical ability, you can port or have someone port the lower intake. Gut the upper. The 4 holes in it are useless. It will almost act as the pvc pipe you suggested only its after the tb. I did my intake and picked up 1mpg. It doesnt sound like much but it was worth my 4 hours.

A good tune up is worth some power as well. Bump the timing up. Maybe even a cam swap. Bo Port has a few hydraulic grinds that work well for street cars even without the turbo. Head milling and porting or even changing over to a turbo head with a Ranger roller cam will net some good gains.

I hope Ive helped better than the rocket scientist did, but what do I know I just build engines for a living.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 6, 2011
#23
  • Sep 6, 2011
  • #23
KhanTyranitar said:
Look I don't have to explain this to you, you are not physicists or engineers.
Click to expand...

That's a cop out someone makes when they have no legitimate data to back up their statements and/or not enough understanding to explain them.
 
K

KhanTyranitar

Member
Apr 21, 2011
93
1
9
Sep 10, 2011
#24
  • Sep 10, 2011
  • #24
65ShelbyClone said:
That's a cop out someone makes when they have no legitimate data to back up their statements and/or not enough understanding to explain them.
Click to expand...

Its not a cop out, I would need to show you diagrams, mathematic figures.

Easy for you to discredit it, but I notice you have no legitimate data or understanding to discredit me either.

I work in the exhaust industry, have a background in mechanical engineering. The rest of that post I did my best at explaining what is going on, and why it produces more power.

If you don't believe it, that is fine, I don't stand to loose anything by people not listening or heeding my advise. I guess it doesn't matter that I fix a lot of these screwed up systems, all to often a car that does not run right, has no CEL or anything, but just hesitates, has no real power, surges, doesn't idle right, gets bad gas mileage. They bring it to me, its got some oversize exhaust system with no cat. Put a cat on it, reset the computer, issues go away. Customer is happy, sends me all his friends. I guess it doesn't matter that my buddies Grand National produces more power with a cat than without. I guess it doesn't matter that my '87 Turbocoupe produces more power than its mods say it should. My setup, which includes a 3" high flow cat, with stock injectors, stock fuel pressure, stock intercooler, 3" cold air intake with cone filter and full shroud, is producing 230 rwhp, though by the hardware, excluding the cat, I shouldn't be able to produce more that 215 - 220 with my setup.
 
D

David19d

New Member
Aug 25, 2011
15
0
0
Sep 10, 2011
#25
  • Sep 10, 2011
  • #25
Whats the question? Cats or no cats? I dont understand how you figure that an internal combustion engine works but your off just a touch. I have never in my life seen a restriction in the exhaust help the flow of it. Even a turbo hurts you to a point. But as I said before Im not a rocket scientist, Im an engine builder.
 
K

KhanTyranitar

Member
Apr 21, 2011
93
1
9
Sep 10, 2011
#26
  • Sep 10, 2011
  • #26
David19d said:
Whats the question? Cats or no cats? I dont understand how you figure that an internal combustion engine works but your off just a touch. I have never in my life seen a restriction in the exhaust help the flow of it. Even a turbo hurts you to a point. But as I said before Im not a rocket scientist, Im an engine builder.
Click to expand...


So the question you need to ask is, does it restrict, or does it induct? If it restricts, then yes, its will cost you power, but it it takes unburned fuel found in the exhaust, converts it into a positive heat and motion, then it becomes less restrictive than a straight pipe. It makes the exhaust want to flow towards the tailpipe more strongly than if there was no cat. The trick is that it has to sized properly, placed properly, functioning properly, ideally have the right cell density, and have a cam that is setup properly.
 
D

David19d

New Member
Aug 25, 2011
15
0
0
Sep 11, 2011
#27
  • Sep 11, 2011
  • #27
Do you honestly think they went into all that crap at the factory? No.......

If what your saying is true, which to a point in theory is true, than nobody in there rite mind would ever cut a cat off there car. Everyone in the free world with a car would pass every emissions test ever, and you could sit in the garage with all the doors and windows closed with the car running and live to tell about it. (try that and get back to me).

Your talking about whats called the venturi affect. That has the same affect as a carburetor or a set of heads thats been ported for high velocity. In that case what you do is make a STEADY FLOWING chamber with no restrictions in the middle of the path. The air (in this case mixed with fuel) gets sped up to create an affect kinda like holding your finger over a garden hose when running. It sprays twice as far with the same amount of effort behind it. This doesnt work in your case.

The exhaust creates its own vacuum as does the intake. Remember an engine is an air pump. When the valve slams shut its pulling the air back toward it, it has to. The difference between the intake and exhaust is that the piston pulls air in on the intake stroke and forces it out on the exhaust. Thats why if you get the firing order wrong it pops. Its trying to pull air threw the exhaust at the same time as the intake and visa versa.

A cat is a restriction thats the bottom line. Basically it comes down to this, breath threw a straw while holding your nose, than breath threw the same straw only with a cup between both ends. Ill bet you dont breath any easier.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
648
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
277
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
F
Fox 1990 Mustang GT 5.0 A9L – Engine suddenly shuts off but immediately restarts when key turned
  • FishermansFriend
  • Aug 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
194
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Friday at 4:56 PM
AeroCoupe
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?