• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

professional products intake.

  • Thread starter Thread starter stang2841
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

FiveLtrRiceEatr

New Member
Oct 2, 2004
197
0
0
Michigan
Dec 11, 2004
#21
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #21
mansonozz said:
It outflows the Performer and RPM, Cobra, and I believe the Victor as well. Nuff said.
Click to expand...

no it suppose to flow like the rpm

I dont know where you got that information, its the same casting as the peformer rpm 5.0
 

Ozz

I think I have a problem here.
Founding Member
Jul 27, 2001
3,514
66
109
Canton, MI
Dec 11, 2004
#22
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #22
FiveLtrRiceEatr said:
no it suppose to flow like the rpm

I dont know where you got that information, its the same casting as the peformer rpm 5.0
Click to expand...

5.0 Mustang & Super Fords did an article, about 8 pages long, flowing all intakes That was the result. Yes it is a copy of the RPM design but either the runners are longer or ports are larger; all I can tell you is that it flows more. That's all that matters, really.

As far as being too much, it depends on what you want to do with the car. If you have future engnie mods planned, get it and wait for it all to work together. You won't LOSE power by putting it on an otherwise-stock engine, but you won't see 100% of its potential while it's working with a stock engine. When I put it on my car, it was otherwise-stock, and I felt a huge difference.

The 70mm TB may be overkill, though, the stock flows well enough to feed the intake. If you plan on a blower, heads, etc., keep it around and put it on at that point.
 

FiveLtrRiceEatr

New Member
Oct 2, 2004
197
0
0
Michigan
Dec 11, 2004
#23
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #23
mansonozz said:
5.0 Mustang & Super Fords did an article, about 8 pages long, flowing all intakes That was the result. Yes it is a copy of the RPM design but either the runners are longer or ports are larger; all I can tell you is that it flows more. That's all that matters, really.
Click to expand...

Oh yeah I remember, it does flow better, I forgot that article! man your up on it

ps I saw your stang in 5.0 today very nice good job!!
 
S

stang2841

New Member
Jun 12, 2004
708
0
0
palm harbor florida
Dec 11, 2004
#24
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #24
its a 65mmtb....
 
S

stang2841

New Member
Jun 12, 2004
708
0
0
palm harbor florida
Dec 11, 2004
#25
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #25
can some1 direct me to the article?

I got plenty of future plans for the car...

but It's gona be a 6-7 months period...


with the mods in my sig do you think with TB and intake a 20rwhp? increase?
 

hllon4whls

BANNED
Founding Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,567
0
46
Covington
Dec 11, 2004
#26
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #26
manpowermustang said:
As far a made in China..... Well thatas sorts hippracritical is'nt it. If thats the reason then return your Digital camera, stereo, DVD Player, Computer, etc because I asure you if you look at the back it say made in China, made in Japan, etc. So all of these things must be junk and you have to return them asap because they arent made in the USA. Think about it .
Click to expand...

I do think about it every day. Performance parts, tools, food and cars are about the only things that I can think of that are made in the USA. If I had a reasonable USA made alternative for the electronic devices I would take it. I think it is a good idea that edelbrock makes all of their intake products here. When you are unemployed and cant find a job, there might be a different story to tell if there was more manufacturing here.

Think about it.
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Dec 11, 2004
#27
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #27
just one more...

Hey I got one of those Typhoons on my LX, put it on at the same time as a BBK 75mm TB and spacer... bought mine off ebay new for about 350 shipped. it wasnt perfect when I got it... so I had to do a lot of work to hog it out to match the TB, id go with a 70mm it would definitely fit better. the runners look pretty ****ty so I spent a couple days total polishing all the runners and the plenum to flow better and opened up one of the runners near the port where there is a pretty bad kink, but it was worth it cuz I almost saved enough by buying it to get the TB! Call it a 2 for one deal. as for being made in china, sure it aint as good as the US stuff, but its just a cast piece of aluminum, not a set of heads or a cam that needs to be perfect to work right.
And it made a BIG difference in power even though my long block is all stock, although THrottle response is lower compared to stock. IT does rub my hood a bit at the plenum, but its not a big deal... but watch the crankcase breather tube on the TB, I put a small dent in my hood cuz it sits a little too high so I had to bend it down a bit. other than that it works great. oh, add some fuel pressure too so it doesnt lean out over 4000 rpms with the stock injectors.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Dec 11, 2004
#28
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #28
I replaced the RPM with the typhoon on my original stock longblock, I do think it's a great peice though still may be too much for a stock setup, you'lll loose velocity down low, but will gain it up top where its designed to live. I would not go bigger than 65mm TB.
 
S

stang2841

New Member
Jun 12, 2004
708
0
0
palm harbor florida
Dec 12, 2004
#29
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #29
I dont want to lose any...


Bought the Intake today....


its not that bad at all....

the guy b4 me arready cleaned it up...

cant wait until I get to bolt on all these new performance parts and go to a manual... completely different car



MSD6A
Blaster Coil
Ford Racing 9mm wires
March Aluminum Underdrives
Smog pump Delete
A/C delete
Manual Swap
Typhoon Intake
65MM TB


all thats awaiting install after christmas!
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Dec 12, 2004
#30
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #30
Ive got one along with their EGR plate and TB and everything was fine , only casting flash I found was on the outside around the runners , no big deal though since you can see them with the upper intake bolted down anyway .... works great , great product for the $$$
 
R

ratrapp

New Member
Apr 24, 2004
510
0
0
buena vista,va
Dec 12, 2004
#31
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #31
you won't lose any low end torque.i've got mine with a 70mm edelbrock tb and spacer with a b-303 cam.my motor isn't a ho plus it has e6 heads.it has great throttle response plus it'll give you a good seat of the pants feel over stock.you made a great purchase,enjoy it.i put mine on out of the box,no port cleaning.you may have hood clearance problems,i had to very lightly trim a small brace away from my hood,if you use convertible motor mounts you might not have this problem at all.
 
M

manpowermustang

Member
Sep 25, 2004
228
0
16
Milwaukee, Wi
Dec 14, 2004
#32
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #32
hllon4whls

I'm all about the american job market, product market, and supporting out country. I sucks that so many comanies sell out to Chin etc. for a cheaper labor. It totally sucks, then the same people bitch about the job rate being so low when they are the blame. IBM just did it. An americam based company sold trier PC department China. Whats going on here.
 

green

New Member
Apr 26, 2003
291
0
0
Dec 14, 2004
#33
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #33
i saw that show to on popular hot rodding tv to. where they compared the 2 and the pp intake was away off compared to the edelbrock intake.
 
L

L8 MUSL

Active Member
Jan 20, 2003
1,664
0
36
Carlsbad, Ca.
Dec 14, 2004
#34
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #34
I've had one for some time.
I'm not sure what some of you guys are talking about though. If you put this intake (or an edelbrock RPM for that matter) on stock heads you are going to lose some low end torque and quite a bit of flow velocity. Look at the difference between the ports on the lower and on a set of E7's. there is a big damning effect going on there.
If you plan on porting the snot out of the stock heads or swaping out to Eddy's or AFR's or something like that It's going to work great, or some form of forced induction It's also going to work well. It is a great intake for a centifugal blower because it builds HP up high just like the blower.
My heads are ported but not "port matched" to the intake and I noticed a loss of low end. But, it will keep pulling right up to my 6,800 RPM rev limiter.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
368
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
Engine EGR spacer for explorer 65mm TB?
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
399
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2024
Noobz347
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
948
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Idle issues….again.
  • Nostang25
  • Sep 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
174
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 7, 2025
AeroCoupe
Engine Explorer - Lower intake internal cleaning
  • R82148V
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 6, 2025
rednotch
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?