• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

pro's and con's of 393, 408 and 418

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2NDTIME
  • Start date Start date Sep 7, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
2

2NDTIME

Founding Member
Nov 5, 2002
334
0
0
Kansas City
Sep 7, 2004
#1
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #1
sorry but you cant search 3 letter words. I have seen a thousand 331 vs. 347 threads. Lets get a thread about how big to go on a 351.

I am just starting to do my research and thought this might be a good way. Hopefully people will post links.
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Sep 7, 2004
#2
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #2
With a 418 you have a .040 overboar. This means you will weaken the block even farther than a 393 or 408. The 393 has a shorter stroke (3.85) than the 408/418 (4.0). THis means that there will be a more agressive rod angle.
 
2

2NDTIME

Founding Member
Nov 5, 2002
334
0
0
Kansas City
Sep 7, 2004
#3
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #3
So lets start with what makes each stroker combo. And what ci options there are with a stock 351 roller block. As in...

393 is a 3.85" crank. Can be had with stroker crank and 351 rods with 302 pistons. Is that std bore or .30 over?
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Sep 7, 2004
#4
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #4
Interesting thread...

With a longer stroke the piston moves more per revolution, making it move faster at the same RPM as a shorter stroke. This longer stroke reduces rod angle which puts more stress on the cylinder walls as well as energy being directed away from the crank. This reduces it's revving cabability. The longer stroke though increases tourque because it acts as a lever on a wider fulcrum.

Going back to the 331 vs 347 it is on the same principle, some like the 331 more because you can rev them better and thier rod angle is better, but the 347 usually offers more low end tq.
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Sep 7, 2004
#5
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #5
2NDTIME said:
So lets start with what makes each stroker combo. And what ci options there are with a stock 351 roller block. As in...

393 is a 3.85" crank. Can be had with stroker crank and 351 rods with 302 pistons. Is that std bore or .30 over?
Click to expand...


393 and 408=.030" overboar
418=.040" overboar
 

dartman

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
121
0
0
cardboard box
Sep 7, 2004
#6
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #6
check my garage..408
 

TT91

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,536
0
36
Paramus, NJ
Sep 7, 2004
#7
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #7
and just for the record, its spelled BORE no BOAR
 

ninjacoupe

New Member
Jul 6, 2003
174
0
0
NY
Sep 7, 2004
#8
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #8
Only disadvantage I see is you will probably go thru tire's very quickly...LOL

How fast do you want to go?
How much do you want to spend?
It does not make sense to build a monster moter to run 12's.
In all honesty anything less than 10's n/a
with these moters and you wasted your money. A streetable 11 second 331 or 347 is more than possible. The only advantage being the 351 parts have a better foundation to start with (block).
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
Sep 7, 2004
#9
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #9
No matter what you do there is going to be advantages and disadvantages. I've always said the advantages outnumber the disadvantages so just build one.
Go 408.... check out sig..... Cruises down the highway and street's without a problem (Execpt Gas Milage) and provide's the viechle's occupant's with a violent feeling when you hit the gas.

Shon
 

FrdMustangCpe

New Member
May 27, 2004
493
0
0
Sin City, NV
Sep 7, 2004
#10
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #10
dont strokers not last as long as a normal b/c its longer stroke or somethin?
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Sep 7, 2004
#11
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #11
You forgot one..
the 427 stroker..
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 7, 2004
#12
  • Sep 7, 2004
  • #12
FrdMustangCpe said:
dont strokers not last as long as a normal b/c its longer stroke or somethin?
Click to expand...

Any engine with higher compression, more rpm, stiffer valvesprings, etc, is going to wear faster than a stock 5.0. Being a stroker just means it will tend to wear certain parts faster. Throwing alot of money at the project to get really high end parts can alleviate this, but it will still happen. A superbike engine is the same way, only stock. High compression, high revving, high power, and you might get 30,000 useable miles out of it.

And thats probably why the 427W isnt mentioned much anymore. Pushing the limits of the production design there.
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Sep 8, 2004
#13
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #13
For the record.

418, #'s in sig. If I remember correctly it's a .03 overbore.

www.strokerpower.com, pics in photopost under mike418w.

mike.
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Sep 8, 2004
#14
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #14
sirsureshot39 said:
and just for the record, its spelled BORE no BOAR
Click to expand...


No wonder why I haven't susceeded in life. Thanks Mr. Webster.
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Sep 8, 2004
#15
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #15
bluevenom867 said:
You forgot one..
the 427 stroker..
Click to expand...


Or how about the 454W?
 
Z

Zmann

New Member
Aug 24, 2004
19
0
0
SE Michigan
Sep 8, 2004
#16
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #16
what ever you do make sure you put a BIG enough head on it!! Atleast a 225 intake runner volume, so that woud be a big high port or an AFR 225, dont wory about the old myth about loss of torque, because with such a long stroke It wont matter, and if you dont have enough head with the long stroke you'll loose 50 -100 hp!
 

fawcett

Member
Sep 10, 2003
380
0
16
Cohasset, Ma
Sep 8, 2004
#17
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #17
mike what are you getting for gas mileage with that big n/a engine?
what mileage would be expected with a force fed 331 with close to comparable performance numbers?
fawcett
 
2

2NDTIME

Founding Member
Nov 5, 2002
334
0
0
Kansas City
Sep 8, 2004
#18
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #18
I am wanting to run 10.80's or faster N/A. 3000# car and will have a C4 with a loose converter and Tbrake. Which I believe is going to take a decent 450rwhp. I am thinking a 408 with AFR205's or mild ported Vic Jr.s and a healthy cam should just about do it.

Just like to see these combos. Thanks for the input.
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Sep 8, 2004
#19
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #19
Zmann said:
what ever you do make sure you put a BIG enough head on it!! Atleast a 225 intake runner volume, so that woud be a big high port or an AFR 225, dont wory about the old myth about loss of torque, because with such a long stroke It wont matter, and if you dont have enough head with the long stroke you'll loose 50 -100 hp!
Click to expand...

I would go with the TFS "R" heads WAYY before a highport. Price is what made me go with them over the AFR's. I believe I paid $1480 through summit.
mike.
 

5.0 HOtrain

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
2,247
0
47
New Hampshire
Sep 8, 2004
#20
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #20
fawcett said:
mike what are you getting for gas mileage with that big n/a engine?
what mileage would be expected with a force fed 331 with close to comparable performance numbers?
fawcett
Click to expand...

Keep in mind that I have a "chokeless" 1000cfm carburetor. I got 10.5mpg the last time I checked it. My buddy has a 331 T-trim that makes 540/543 at the wheels and he gets worse than me when he drives hard, and a little better than me when he takes it easy.
mike.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
965
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
J
Need Help: 95 Mustang GT Engine Rebuild
  • jurban421
  • Jul 25, 2021
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Jul 25, 2021
jurban421
J
K
Project Ideas (2006 S197)
  • Kitsune187
  • Apr 22, 2019
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2019
Kitsune187
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?