• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Pulleys: Steeda, March, Slp

  • Thread starter Thread starter FOXCOUPE
  • Start date Start date Sep 1, 2006
F

FOXCOUPE

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
399
0
16
vancouver
Sep 1, 2006
#1
  • Sep 1, 2006
  • #1
All 3 are non piggy back and have a SFI aproved dampner but are they different in size? Is one brands crank, alt. or wp. pulley smaller or bigger then the other? If this is the case then maybe this is why some people claim to have made gains and others have not.
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Sep 1, 2006
#2
  • Sep 1, 2006
  • #2
cant go wrong with steeda
 

lvmustanggt

New Member
Apr 9, 2006
721
0
0
Las Vegas
Sep 2, 2006
#3
  • Sep 2, 2006
  • #3
I have steeda and it's good. FRI UDP don't worth *****. I may got 2rwhp out of it
 

StangPro

New Member
Sep 30, 2004
441
0
0
Roseville, MI
Sep 2, 2006
#4
  • Sep 2, 2006
  • #4
The dampers are all different materials and durometers too, so they have different dampening characteristics for the harmonics. What this means to you is each one makes your engine wear differently.

Using anything but Steeda or SHM can lead to 70k rebuilds (worst case, but I've seen it).
 

fluffyrunnells

New Member
Feb 4, 2006
0
0
0
new hampshire
Sep 2, 2006
#5
  • Sep 2, 2006
  • #5
steeda +1
 
F

FOXCOUPE

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
399
0
16
vancouver
Sep 3, 2006
#6
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #6
For those of u with steeda pulley's, did u actually feel any improvment or is it more of a "dyno" mod?
 
T

Torinalth

Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
952
0
16
Clayton NC
Sep 3, 2006
#7
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #7
maybe i am wrong here... but if i am not mistaken i believe SLP has steeda make theirs.... either way, i'd go steeda.

Torinalth
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Sep 3, 2006
#8
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #8
lvmustanggt said:
I have steeda and it's good. FRI UDP don't worth *****. I may got 2rwhp out of it
Click to expand...

You should get 7-9 WHP. Looks like you got raped . Anyway, every little bit helps...
 

StangPro

New Member
Sep 30, 2004
441
0
0
Roseville, MI
Sep 3, 2006
#9
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #9
Torinalth said:
maybe i am wrong here... but if i am not mistaken i believe SLP has steeda make theirs.... either way, i'd go steeda.

Torinalth
Click to expand...

We stock both, and that's how it looks to me.
I think SLP realized the Steedas are excellent parts.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Sep 3, 2006
#10
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #10
FOXCOUPE said:
For those of u with steeda pulley's, did u actually feel any improvment or is it more of a "dyno" mod?
Click to expand...
I got steeda's, you notice it in the throttle response but nothing to shat urself over
 

StangPro

New Member
Sep 30, 2004
441
0
0
Roseville, MI
Sep 3, 2006
#11
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #11
CobraRed_96_GT said:
I got steeda's, you notice it in the throttle response but nothing to shat urself over
Click to expand...

lol...well put.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 3, 2006
#12
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #12
Stock dampener is better than any of the above mentioned...even steedas.

Get the March piggy back pulleys...they are only $130ish and you get to keep your stock ballancer. I have them and ZERO problems, they even went on the crank without issue. I love em . And use RTV sealant in the grooved key passage as directed or it may leak engine oil.
 

StangPro

New Member
Sep 30, 2004
441
0
0
Roseville, MI
Sep 4, 2006
#13
  • Sep 4, 2006
  • #13
hotmustang331 said:
Stock dampener is better than any of the above mentioned...even steedas.

Get the March piggy back pulleys...they are only $130ish and you get to keep your stock ballancer. I have them and ZERO problems, they even went on the crank without issue. I love em . And use RTV sealant in the grooved key passage as directed or it may leak engine oil.
Click to expand...

That's actually horrible completely incorrect advice.

In stock form this would be true. When you piggyback the crank pulleys though, you increase the dampers weight significantly and move the damper farther forward. This results in greater wear on the engine.
 

OV10stang

Member
Aug 7, 2005
48
0
16
Pembroke, NH
Sep 4, 2006
#14
  • Sep 4, 2006
  • #14
You might get a couple hp higher up, like at 6k or so. Like someone else said, every little bit helps. I mainly did it because I'm running 4.10's and always turning more rpms than normal. When on the highway, I'm turning about 2800 rpms at 75 mph.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 4, 2006
#15
  • Sep 4, 2006
  • #15
StangPro said:
That's actually horrible completely incorrect advice.

In stock form this would be true. When you piggyback the crank pulleys though, you increase the dampers weight significantly and move the damper farther forward. This results in greater wear on the engine.
Click to expand...

You apparently never installed piggy back styles before. The only possable increased wear would be on the front main bearing....and the force of say a supercharger (tight belt) would HEAVILY HEAVILY HEAVILY wear it more than a few more #s on the crank.

Steedas and the others dampener is smaller, and doesnt remove the vibrations as effectivly as the stock one....ill take a SUPER slightly more worn front bearing than more vibration going through my rotating assylembly @ 6200RPMs. There have been many engine failures reported (I did some looking into this crap before I decided which kit to get...PB or new ballancer) on engines with aftermarket UD pulley/crank dampeners.
Steedas will not reduce harmonics as well as the stock one, but its reported to be the best on the aftermarket...and isnt much worse than stock.

Dont ask where I accumulated this info from as its been a while...but thats why I didnt put an aftermarket dampener on my car that sees more RPM than the adverage 2V. If you MUST get an aftermarket dampner, get steedas.

EDIT: have you seen the GT-500 motor? It has a setup simular to the piggy back style I have...huge dampener/pulley pushed out for the drive accessoris, and a pulley behind it turning the S/C. Its the same thing as what I did...and I doubt Ford would do that if it had any ill effect.
 

TangerineGT96

New Member
Sep 24, 2005
134
0
0
arkansas
Sep 5, 2006
#16
  • Sep 5, 2006
  • #16
STEEDA!!!
 
T

Todd00GT1

New Member
Mar 25, 2006
38
0
0
New Cumberland, PA
Sep 5, 2006
#17
  • Sep 5, 2006
  • #17
I have Steeda. I always heard Steeda has the best when I was doing my pulley shopping.
 
S

stng

New Member
Jul 27, 2005
182
0
0
Sep 5, 2006
#18
  • Sep 5, 2006
  • #18
+1 for what mustang331 says... I also did quite a bit of research before installing mine. I too had heard all the horror stories about the piggyback style, but after researching it they turned out to be more of an "Urban Legend" than anything. I have been running the March Piggyback style for years now with absolutely Zero problems.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Sep 5, 2006
#19
  • Sep 5, 2006
  • #19
I did the Steeda pullies after years of telling others not to. Anyway, I'm glad I did.. my gas mileage has improved and that new crank pulley looks 500 times better than the old brown rust colored stock one did.

I used my air compressor quite a bit. Easy installation if you follow directions well, and if you rent the pulley removal tool from Autozone.
 
P

Pennywise2

Banned
May 16, 2006
1,379
1
0
Sep 6, 2006
#20
  • Sep 6, 2006
  • #20
I have had Steeda Underdrive pulleys on my mustang for the
past four years and I have had no problems with them.
I also can feel more throttle responce!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
279
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
310
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
610
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?