• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Question on Octane ratings for Michael or anyone else familiar with the subject

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Shape
  • Start date Start date Aug 31, 2004

The Shape

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
2,224
8
49
East ARKANSAS Delta
Aug 31, 2004
#1
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #1
When I bought my car about 3 years ago I knew nothing at all about cars. I just pumped 93 octane gas because it is an HO motor so I assumed it needed it. After seeing a few threads about it and reading up on it from some of the links Michael and others have posted I decided it was a waste of money. So I ran about two tanks of 87, but the car didn't seem to run the same. It is hard to pinpoint, but the engine just didn't seem as smooth. I am just wondering if by runing 93 all of this time my engine for some reason now needs it to run correctly? And if so why? And other than the hit to the wallet is there any damage to be caused by running 93 as opposed to 87? My timing is at 10* on a stock enginine by the way.
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Aug 31, 2004
#2
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #2
Octaine is the rating of resistance of detonation under pressure. A stock mustang would not need high octaing fuel providing the timing is stock.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 31, 2004
#3
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #3
You want to run the lowest you can with out any pinging, this isures a hot charge and the car will be at peak power.

I found on the stock style 5.o's I work on they do not like 87 but run good on 89, why not 100% sure. I always ran 92-93 in mine when it was stock years ago.
 
R

RickyB

New Member
Jan 17, 2002
592
0
0
NJ
Aug 31, 2004
#4
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #4
general consensus is to run the lowest octane possible w/o detonation, pinging, etc...if it runs like crap with 87, try 89, if it still does step up to 91/2, if that dont work something must be wrong with your car ...cause im pretty sure foxes werent rated at 93
 

The Shape

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
2,224
8
49
East ARKANSAS Delta
Aug 31, 2004
#5
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #5
Yeah the owners manual says 87. But like Rick91Gt said my car doesn't seem to like that. I may try 89 and see what happens. Never seen 91 ocatne. Here we just have 87 89 and 93.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Aug 31, 2004
#6
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #6
Shape - do a search on "octane ratings" in google - you'll learn a ton and can come back and educate us about how the rating system has changed overtime.

My car has a mild H/C/I set up, runs with 18 degrees initial timing, 34 degrees total in by 2800, and I run 87 octane with no detonation at all even in the summer heat.

You can also do a search in Car & Driver - they did an octane test a while back - testing different cars back to back with different fuel. Absolutely no difference except for cars that had knock sensors to allow more timing when higher octane provided detonation resistance.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 31, 2004
#7
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #7
It also depends on the brand of fuel and if it is SUMMER or WINTERIZED gas, way to may things can cauase it to run rough.

I noticed a little better burn on my plugs with the 89 over the 87, otherwise I would have run the 87. The plugs are your true reading off what is going on.

I think around here you can get 91,92 or 93 depending on what the brand is.
 
S

Schlodes

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
354
0
0
Lidsville.... West side dawg..
Aug 31, 2004
#8
  • Aug 31, 2004
  • #8
I run 91 Octane from the 7-11 around the corner. It's decent stuff cause I could run 15 PSI boost in the T Type with minimal [2-3*] knock retard on the scantool. Sunoco 94 would allow for about 17 PSI in that car with the same knock #s.

I run 15* initial timing and no pinging... I've used Sunoco 94, and it doesn't run much diff than the 91. Wonder who supplies 7-11s 91 fuel?? Could BE Sunoco for all I know..
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Sep 1, 2004
#9
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #9
It also depends on the part of the country - there are over 130 different formulations required by the EPA all over the country - and people wonder why gasoline prices are high; just keeping the different formulations straight/separate in the liquid pipelines and tank farms is a logistical nightmare.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 1, 2004
#10
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #10
I run 16* on 89 with no detonation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
300
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
279
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
842
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
856
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?