• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Brakes Rotor size question

  • Thread starter Thread starter derek1993
  • Start date Start date May 16, 2021

derek1993

Active Member
Sep 13, 2020
162
79
38
Thompson's Station, TN
May 16, 2021
#1
  • May 16, 2021
  • #1
Mounted up calipers and rotors today, looking at the coverage of the pad on the rotor face it looks like width of the face is made for a bigger/wider pad or setup?
Everything mounted up correctly, but just concerned about the amount of rotor not being used /touched. Triple checking part #s, etc.
Rotors are from r1 concepts
 

Attachments

  • 20210516_102700.webp
    189.8 KB · Views: 181
  • 20210516_102656.webp
    201.7 KB · Views: 137

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,862
224
Massachusetts
May 17, 2021
#2
  • May 17, 2021
  • #2
Yes, it's normal for the 13" cobra setup to only have 2" or so of pad coverage on the face. Your setup is correct. It's just how it is.

That caliper was originally used in early 80's corvettes with a 12" rotor setup, so there wasn't much face to contact originally. In the 90's PBR redesigned the caliper to offer more pad sweep area for 13"-13.5" rotors and GM adopted it for the '97 Corvette. Ford stuck with the early caliper through 2004 and never made the change.

I actually run the new design PBR on my car. Baer used to make brackets for it, and it covers ALL of the rotor face which is what I like about it. Same piston sizes as the Cobra, but MUCH more pad area.
 
Reactions: Wayne Waldrep

derek1993

Active Member
Sep 13, 2020
162
79
38
Thompson's Station, TN
May 17, 2021
#3
  • May 17, 2021
  • #3
Mustang5L5 said:
Yes, it's normal for the 13" cobra setup to only have 2" or so of pad coverage on the face. Your setup is correct. It's just how it is.

That caliper was originally used in early 80's corvettes with a 12" rotor setup, so there wasn't much face to contact originally. In the 90's PBR redesigned the caliper to offer more pad sweep area for 13"-13.5" rotors and GM adopted it for the '97 Corvette. Ford stuck with the early caliper through 2004 and never made the change.

I actually run the new design PBR on my car. Baer used to make brackets for it, and it covers ALL of the rotor face which is what I like about it. Same piston sizes as the Cobra, but MUCH more pad area.
Click to expand...
 

derek1993

Active Member
Sep 13, 2020
162
79
38
Thompson's Station, TN
May 17, 2021
#4
  • May 17, 2021
  • #4
Thanks Mike, appreciate the information. Something to look at in the future then. I'll just need to quiet my OCD for a while (and swap the rotor since i realized once i took the pic that i had the wrong side on)..

Now to figure why the pad retaining pin was so tight.. probably need to take a small hole file and clean up paint a bit..
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,862
224
Massachusetts
May 17, 2021
#5
  • May 17, 2021
  • #5
You need to go by the internal vanes to determine rotor direction. My rotor in the above pic is on the same way, but it's the correct orientation due to the internal vanes.

 
Reactions: derek1993

derek1993

Active Member
Sep 13, 2020
162
79
38
Thompson's Station, TN
May 18, 2021
#6
  • May 18, 2021
  • #6
Mustang5L5 said:
You need to go by the internal vanes to determine rotor direction. My rotor in the above pic is on the same way, but it's the correct orientation due to the internal vanes.

Click to expand...
No directional vanes on these rotors (that i could tell), followed their guide.. All set now. Thanks again.. onto the next step..
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
May 18, 2021
#7
  • May 18, 2021
  • #7
Mustang5L5 said:
Yes, it's normal for the 13" cobra setup to only have 2" or so of pad coverage on the face. Your setup is correct. It's just how it is.

That caliper was originally used in early 80's corvettes with a 12" rotor setup, so there wasn't much face to contact originally. In the 90's PBR redesigned the caliper to offer more pad sweep area for 13"-13.5" rotors and GM adopted it for the '97 Corvette. Ford stuck with the early caliper through 2004 and never made the change.

I actually run the new design PBR on my car. Baer used to make brackets for it, and it covers ALL of the rotor face which is what I like about it. Same piston sizes as the Cobra, but MUCH more pad area.
Click to expand...
The bigger calipers look cooler.
Not a lot of the breaking work is done by the inner area of the disc. Surface area and mass are important (especially for heat exchange), but the distance from the hub determines a lot of the torque applied. Think of a 6” socket wrench vs a 2’ breaker bar - that change just made you 4x more foot pounds of torque on a rotational mass. (Like a bigger rotor.) Putting both hands near the end of the long handle to pull will do more than spreading them apart across the breaker bar.
Now, if you get mad like Bruce Banner and have a Bill Bixby to Lou Faringo transformation, (bigger and stronger calipers and brake pads), you can clamp down on more of the breaker bar and change the angular momentum even faster.
The bigger calipers are better for heavier use. But if you are not seeing track time, I wonder if they are worth the extra weight, fitting hassle and cost. Also, will your cat’s shoes still fit? It seems the Hulk ended up loosing his shoes in every episode.
 
Reactions: derek1993 and General karthief
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Monday at 10:16 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
101
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Tuesday at 8:58 PM
Noobz347
Wheels-Tires LS mii swap and rear rim size/axle questions....
  • 78mIIman
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
683
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 6, 2025
78 Mach1
Rear drums dragging
  • cnorman31
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 15, 2025
AeroCoupe
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
389
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Monday at 2:45 PM
joeybuddy96
J
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
675
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?