• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Rousch 360R Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter SFgiants25
  • Start date Start date Feb 17, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

00s281sc368

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
532
0
0
Fremont, CA
Feb 17, 2004
#21
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #21
IF the tunning is right it's probably the same. The worst might be roots type because of higher air temperature even with intercooler...
 

Firemanz

Only you can prevent Forest Fires!
Founding Member
Dec 13, 2001
4,105
0
0
San Antonio, TX
Feb 17, 2004
#22
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #22
Alot of it's in the tune and driving style. Gotta make sure you have enough fuel but not too much so that you're running rich.
 
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
Puerto Rico
Feb 17, 2004
#23
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #23
SFgiants25 said:
Quick question> Which is usually easier on the block Roots type/TwinS or Centri.????
Click to expand...
IMO, twin screws are easier on the block since the intake temperature is considerable lower than roots or centrifugals. Lowe intake temperatures mean a lower probability of detonation, which is really bad for your engine. But it all boils down to the tune. Also, make sure you run on high octane fuel (91+) or as indicated by the tune/supercharger manufacturer.
 
B

BULLITT#828

New Member
Nov 9, 2003
60
0
0
Austin, TX
Feb 18, 2004
#24
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #24
el_kid_1 said:
Why do people go around saying that the KB (or twin screws in general) best application is for "street" and that centrifugals are for "drag racing"? It blows me every time a read such statements.

As far as I know, winning drag races is all about having the most area under the power curve, regardless of peak hp numbers, and having good driving skills. IMO, that combo is unbeatable...comparing apples to apples, if you know what I mean. Let's us say that you have a twin screw and a centrifugal set at 11 psi. The centrifugal will never have 11 psi until the top of the rpm band. Whereas, the twin screw will have it all the way from around 2000 rpm to the top of the rpm band. So, having said that, why is the centrifugal better for "drag racing"? And please, show me the facts!!
Click to expand...

Look, I realize that you're going to try to defend your Kenne Bell equipped car. I'm not trying to bash it (I love the KB system), nor am I talking out of my ass. You're getting info from a Mechanical Engineer who studied heavily in theromdynamics and heat power, fluid flow, and automotive engineering (under an ex-powertrain engineer for GM who worked on the Corvette design team back in the 80's). So don't take my comments as if they're from some teenage ricer with his mom's Civic. Thanks.

You're right, area under the curve is very important. My point is that, when drag racing, you rarely spend much time in the lower rpm's where roots and screw blowers shine most. As I said before, at high rpm's, PD blowers are not in their peak effiency and tend to begin losing boost pressure slightly, where Centrifugals on the other hand ARE at their peak efficiencies and usually produce more "area under the curve" from 4200-6200 rpms. Most don't even start making serious boost until after 3k.

Your car will almost certainly make more power off-idle and up through the midrange, making it preferred for the stop and go of daily driving. I'm sorry that I don't have the thermal efficiecies of each blower ever made but if you were to find them, the general trend would follow my statements closely.

Trust me.

Ian
 

ponyguy

New Member
Apr 16, 2003
189
0
0
Chicago
Feb 18, 2004
#25
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #25
i don't think most rousch or saleen owners give a rat's butt that x-car may be 2 tenths faster at this or that. its all about a reliable package. and the compliments. never even came close to getting as many as in my old vette, cobra, whatever i had.
 

snkchmr

Active Member
Apr 18, 1999
2,671
3
49
Gretna Va
Feb 18, 2004
#26
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #26
I got rid of my Bullitt for my Roush because with the money I was going to put in the B to SC it & get some other stuff done & put that on a personal loan with 7% or so interest along with the payment on the B. I was better off to trade in for a new car with a SC & still have a warrantee & chaper payments in the long run.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
477
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?