• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

RPM heads, underestimated??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paul Perreca
  • Start date Start date Aug 8, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Aug 9, 2005
#21
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #21
You will need the head bolt bushings if you go with the RPM heads..you can't put them on withou them. The bushings allow the head to be used on either the 351 or the 302...bushings are only 40 if memory serves me correctly...also the rpm heads are not emission component ready.Also I wouldn't use anything but ARP bolts..don't go using your old head bolts...not a good idea.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Aug 9, 2005
#22
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #22
Actually IF you read the fine print on any if not ALL the head Shootouts.. they all say the Velocity... air speed.. low lift numbers.. cfm under .400 blah.. blah... blah... and you look at the HP ( Posted HP gains) they are ALL with in 10-20 HP !! SOOooo... as stated above.. want a 12 sec car.. 11 sec?? Power adders?? In real life the "brocks will fit right in there!! as well as the GT40s.. but it must be cool to anounce.. AFR's.. or TW... Or Brodix on a daily driver.. to me and a lot of others all it says is 'I have more money to spend!!" Cool?? and the performance of most dual pourpose street/strip cars are not even CLOSE to the potential of the Big Killer heads they are running.. I Know there are a lot of 'Brock headed cars out there, I do more of those heads than any other, and they are some real fast cars... SOOOoo... again, I feel it is a Name game more than a "all I can get out of it " game.. dont you?? Buy the Brocks.. save a buck or two and spend that on tune!! then you'll need to buy a bunch of 1/2 inch wrenches !! Why?? well you'll need to help the high dollar boy bolt back on his doors after to blow them of... cool??

Just me.......................

Thumper
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Aug 9, 2005
#23
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #23
thumper460 said:
Actually IF you read the fine print on any if not ALL the head Shootouts.. they all say the Velocity... air speed.. low lift numbers.. cfm under .400 blah.. blah... blah... and you look at the HP ( Posted HP gains) they are ALL with in 10-20 HP !! SOOooo... as stated above.. want a 12 sec car.. 11 sec?? Power adders?? In real life the "brocks will fit right in there!! as well as the GT40s.. but it must be cool to anounce.. AFR's.. or TW... Or Brodix on a daily driver.. to me and a lot of others all it says is 'I have more money to spend!!" Cool?? and the performance of most dual pourpose street/strip cars are not even CLOSE to the potential of the Big Killer heads they are running.. I Know there are a lot of 'Brock headed cars out there, I do more of those heads than any other, and they are some real fast cars... SOOOoo... again, I feel it is a Name game more than a "all I can get out of it " game.. dont you?? Buy the Brocks.. save a buck or two and spend that on tune!! then you'll need to buy a bunch of 1/2 inch wrenches !! Why?? well you'll need to help the high dollar boy bolt back on his doors after to blow them of... cool??

Just me.......................

Thumper
Click to expand...

Paul you should listen to this guy..one of the best in our hobby
 

Fishhawk

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
281
0
0
Michigan City, Indiana
Aug 9, 2005
#24
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #24
Last summer when I was shopping for heads I had narrowed my choices to the Ford Racing Y303 and the Edelbrock Performer. While talking to a tech at Ford Racing he admitted the Edelbrock heads had much better flow numbers then the Ford heads. He told me I would have to have some porting done to the Y303's to equal the Edelbrocks. When I found out that the Performer and RPM heads were the same heads (Performer has EGR port, RPM does not) the choice was easy.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Aug 9, 2005
#25
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #25
Again the RPM heads require the bushings to work on the 302's available from Edlebrock..but NOT included with the heads. Also note...you really need to go with new or ARP head bolts..I would NOT use the old stock head bolts..and HIGHLY recommend the ARP's...very important in my opinion.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Aug 9, 2005
#26
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #26
If you want to compare heads based on flow numbers here is a link:

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/630.shtml

Keep in mind however that the "Performer 5.0" numbers are the old edelbrock castings. The new castings bump the intake flow up to 245 cfm at .500 lift.
 

txstang84

15 Year Member
May 21, 2005
1,639
42
69
Tuscola, tx
Aug 9, 2005
#27
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #27
DMAN302 said:
Again the RPM heads require the bushings to work on the 302's available from Edlebrock..but NOT included with the heads. Also note...you really need to go with new or ARP head bolts..I would NOT use the old stock head bolts..and HIGHLY recommend the ARP's...very important in my opinion.
Click to expand...


....soooooo, what you're saying is, go with ARP fasteners, lol jk

ditto on the ARP hardware, best way to put an engine together IMO. I didn't realize though, that the older head design (that's what I have) have lower flow numbers-they still run like a scalded dog, but in that respect, are the older castings capable of flowing just as much as the new ones with a little work?
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Aug 9, 2005
#28
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #28
Easily.. even outflow the new version...it's all about how good the man with the grinder in hand is.
 

Daniel50

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
716
1
0
Discovery Bay, CA
Aug 9, 2005
#29
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #29
what about the performer heads?
 
9

91RRLX

New Member
Jul 26, 2004
34
0
0
Timberlake, NC
Aug 9, 2005
#30
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #30
For what it's worth I'm doing a tech write-up in co-operation with David Vizard(If you notice he does a lot of tech writing for MM&FFs as well as other magazines) for DragRacingOnline.com as well as possibly MM&FFs. I'll have before and after dyno results, may pics along they way as well as before and after 1/4 mile passes. I'm actually going this friday to get the basline dyno runs and 1/4 mile passes.

One good feature about the heads it they have excellent swirl, meaning when the air enters the combustion chamber it "swirls" around in the combustion chamber better equalizing the air fuel charge within the combustion chamber.

As many others have posted they are right up there with the AFR heads and others.

I'll keep you guys posted on what I find with my car and when the article is up on DragRacingOnline.

Also later this fall we will be testing a few intakes. One is a stock 5.0 intake that makes as much as 20 hp and tq EVERYWHERE in the power band
I know there will be some skeptics here, but it's true.
Stay Tuned. PM me if you have any other questions.
J
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Aug 9, 2005
#31
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #31
I work in the automotive field as well and frequent with the Edelbrock reps. Edelbrock makes superior American made products and backs them very well. The RPM and Performer heads are great and should flow right there with the best of them in almost every area.
 

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Aug 9, 2005
#32
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #32
Yea, I got the prices on everything i need, and matched them up w/ Jegs and Summit, and the roller rockers are cheaper (they are crane) and the pushrods are cheaper (ford) and I'm not sure about ARP's headbolts, which I also WILL BE GETTING DMAN!!!!!!! and The head gaskets (i beleive felpro, not sure) are like 70 bucks, and the heads are 1090 from my guy. I bought a cobra intake polished aluminum from him for 480 and the regular is like 380, I bought Hpipe and Headers for 320 combined - and that wasn't bad either - cam was 195 (little steep for E cam) but no shipping lol -

You guys have fully talked me into buying the Edelbrock heads. My friend is very satisfied w/ them, but he has them on his 347 stroker, so I didn't know whether it was just worked well w/ his car or not -

Should i go 1.7 RR's or 1.6's ???
What is easier, i'm always afraid of that clearance w/ valve covers.....
aftermarket ford racing covers
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Aug 9, 2005
#33
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #33
Remember 1.7's effectivly raise the lift of your camshaft (.498" lift with 1.6 ratio)....so beware of piston to valve clearance. Your lift with the 1.7's would be .529" or so.....it SHOULD clear but definitly measure for clearance before you fire the engine.
 

Blandnuts

I don't swallow; I only swoosh
Founding Member
Aug 21, 2000
1,172
124
124
FloorDuh
Aug 10, 2005
#34
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #34
In the racing pages there's a set of ed rpms for $995.... Although, I can't seem to find them on their site it's in the mag....

www.propowerparts.com

Could try and price match it.
 

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Aug 10, 2005
#35
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #35
the price w/ shipping would come close to regular price anyway prob lol
Paul Perreca
 

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Aug 11, 2005
#36
  • Aug 11, 2005
  • #36
what the hell does it need head bolt bushings for - if the heads are made for a "302" ford block, than why would it need "adapters" to make it fit, it should just fit - where to they go and why do I need them???
Paul Perreca
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Aug 11, 2005
#37
  • Aug 11, 2005
  • #37
Bushings are required because the heads are used on both 351 and 302, they need to be used for the headbolts to be torqued down..hell with all the money you'll end up spending on a new motor and the install, you'll find that 40$$ pretty insignificant. Good luck on the new set up...you'll like it.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Aug 11, 2005
#38
  • Aug 11, 2005
  • #38
Also, I belive older 302 blocks were machined for 1/2" head bolts...I'm pretty sure anyway.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
726
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
692
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 17, 2026
fasterthangas
F
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
936
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread Evolution of the 'Hudson Heap' plans (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Jan 5, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 26, 2024
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?