• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

rwhp loss through the drivetrain

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98stangv8
  • Start date Start date Dec 26, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

98stangv8

Active Member
Oct 3, 2003
1,036
0
36
fayetteville, nc
Dec 26, 2008
#1
  • Dec 26, 2008
  • #1
Ok...I have a 5 speed...how much horsepower loss is generally accepted as to being lost from the engine to the rear wheels?

Thanks!
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Dec 26, 2008
#2
  • Dec 26, 2008
  • #2
Around 15% of your flywheel horsepower for a 5 speed. That is not exact, but a fairly common figure.
 
T

texas01gt

New Member
Jul 18, 2008
8
0
0
Dec 26, 2008
#3
  • Dec 26, 2008
  • #3
these engines are rating at 260hp at the flywheel...i had my car dynoed STOCK AS A ROCK!!...save for some SLP mufflers...stock H pipe with all 4 cats though..and i put down 230hp to the wheels, thats with a 5 speed.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Dec 26, 2008
#4
  • Dec 26, 2008
  • #4
BurningRubber said:
Around 15% of your flywheel horsepower for a 5 speed. That is not exact, but a fairly common figure.
Click to expand...

i hate when people say a percentage, because its not true at all, so 1000 crank hp, would mean 150hp loss throught the drive train, which is crazy..

manual 30-35hp loss
 

98stangv8

Active Member
Oct 3, 2003
1,036
0
36
fayetteville, nc
Dec 26, 2008
#5
  • Dec 26, 2008
  • #5
98COBRA281 said:
i hate when people say a percentage, because its not true at all, so 1000 crank hp, would mean 150hp loss throught the drive train, which is crazy..

manual 30-35hp loss
Click to expand...


the guy above was at at 12% loss...I have heard 10-15%....if you are running 1000 hp at the crank...you are going to lose more than a guy running 260 hp at the crank...so it should be more of a %age than a number...
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Dec 26, 2008
#6
  • Dec 26, 2008
  • #6
98stangv8 said:
the guy above was at at 12% loss...I have heard 10-15%....if you are running 1000 hp at the crank...you are going to lose more than a guy running 260 hp at the crank...so it should be more of a %age than a number...
Click to expand...

why would you lose more hp just because you make more power? theres no difference.......
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Dec 26, 2008
#7
  • Dec 26, 2008
  • #7
98COBRA281 said:
why would you lose more hp just because you make more power? theres no difference.......
Click to expand...
Move an oar through water, then move it 5 times the speed through water. Notice a difference? Relate to oil respectively.

It's %
 

98stangv8

Active Member
Oct 3, 2003
1,036
0
36
fayetteville, nc
Dec 26, 2008
#8
  • Dec 26, 2008
  • #8
anyone else have some insight into this?
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Dec 26, 2008
#9
  • Dec 26, 2008
  • #9
98stangv8 said:
anyone else have some insight into this?
Click to expand...
i usually say 14-15% through a 5 speed or 6 speed, and 18.5-20.5% on a 4R70W depending on build.
 

98stangv8

Active Member
Oct 3, 2003
1,036
0
36
fayetteville, nc
Dec 26, 2008
#10
  • Dec 26, 2008
  • #10
CobraRed_96_GT said:
i usually say 14-15% through a 5 speed or 6 speed, and 18.5-20.5% on a 4R70W depending on build.
Click to expand...

I agree with your %age analogy...nice
 

96SCstang

New Member
Jul 22, 2006
228
0
0
novi, MI
Dec 27, 2008
#11
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #11
it is a very true statement to say you will lose more power if you make more power. the general rule of thumb as stated is 15%. that goes for if your making 100 hp or 2500 hp. it's just the way it is.
 
N

Nitrous03GT

New Member
Nov 21, 2008
17
0
0
Dec 27, 2008
#12
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #12
People like to say 15%...but that is a generalized statement that doesnt take into effect many variables..such as rotational mass, gearing, car weight and such...but honestly what does it matter? its not so much the power that the engine makes, its the power that is effectively put to the wheels as they push the car forward. but if you really wanna know what kind of loss YOUR particular car has and if you want an ACCURATE number, take the motor out of the car and have it engine dynoed, then put it back and do a wheel dyno....but even that isnt that accurate because different dynoes will give you different numbers...so...yea.
 

5.0Torx

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
252
3
29
Dec 28, 2008
#13
  • Dec 28, 2008
  • #13
98COBRA281 said:
i hate when people say a percentage, because its not true at all, so 1000 crank hp, would mean 150hp loss throught the drive train, which is crazy..
Click to expand...

thats actually exactly how it works
 

NitroDuck

I put out on the 1st date
Founding Member
Aug 17, 1999
4,406
0
66
Baltimore, MD
Dec 29, 2008
#14
  • Dec 29, 2008
  • #14
98COBRA281 said:
why would you lose more hp just because you make more power? theres no difference.......
Click to expand...

Because the transmission causes an operating loss of roughly 10-15% due to heat & friction. Its not like it arbitrarily saps 30hp no matter what, just "cause it wants to."
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,390
3,536
233
Dec 29, 2008
#15
  • Dec 29, 2008
  • #15
Yep, everybody is right on with the hp % loss. I have dynod 9-10 or the cars I have owned and two were engine dynod and then chasis dynod. My 94 LT1 Formula lost 21% through its Auto and my 300Z TT lost 16% through its 5 speed.

When I first got into modding it took me a bit to wrap my head around the percentage loss wrather then just a base number but thats how it is

BTW, my Z was making 421 rwhp and 501 fly wheel hp. When the car was stock it did 254 rwhp and they are rated 300 stock. And that was ZERO mods. So it appears the numbers are right
 
J

JBVobra

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2000
594
0
16
Corpus Christi, Tx.
Dec 29, 2008
#16
  • Dec 29, 2008
  • #16
my 04 cobra dynoed 379rwhp sae. car was rated at 390 crank hp. 2.8% loss?

actually, of all the other cars I've owned and had dynoed showroom stock, the loss was pretty much in the same percentage ballpark:

98 cobra - 264sae/305crank = 13.4%
01 bullitt - 240sae/265crank = 9.4%
02 z06 - 353sae/405crank = 12.8%
06 z06 - 453sae/505crank = 10.3%


the 06 z06 was also under the new, more conservative sae J1349 crank certification that I guess all engines are rated today. so 505 is really conservative for that ls7

the bullitt? don't know on that one....it was just freakishly fast. Dynoed on at least 3 different houston area dynos and just laid the wood everytime. This was one instance where dyno numbers really did equate into street warrior. I use to destroy other gt's and bullitts at HRP. that car was the poster child for factory freak
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Dec 29, 2008
#17
  • Dec 29, 2008
  • #17
98COBRA281 said:
i hate when people say a percentage, because its not true at all, so 1000 crank hp, would mean 150hp loss throught the drive train, which is crazy..

manual 30-35hp loss
Click to expand...

So if we stuck a 35HP 4 banger engine into your car all you would get is 5RWHP? What happens with a 20HP engine? Are you now in the negative?


Its a PERCENTAGE bro 12-15% on average as others have stated
 

Purostaff

New Member
Aug 10, 2007
4
0
1
Dec 29, 2008
#18
  • Dec 29, 2008
  • #18
Here's my dyno graph: 700 miles on the car 100% stock w/ air silencer removed



So it's about 12-13% loss.. for my case
 

Attachments

  • dynostock01.webp
    19.2 KB · Views: 273

joshheat25

Member
Nov 8, 2004
871
0
16
Delaware
Dec 30, 2008
#19
  • Dec 30, 2008
  • #19
JBVobra said:
my 04 cobra dynoed 379rwhp sae. car was rated at 390 crank hp. 2.8% loss?
Click to expand...


lol yea I'd say the 03-04 Cobras are a tad under rated!

It is a percentage of loss! one thing to help is to add a lighter Driveshaft, because it is ligher there is less rotating mass and less energy is needed to rotate it.
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Dec 30, 2008
#20
  • Dec 30, 2008
  • #20
I have always heard the same thing about the percentages too. The higher HP #'s the car has, the more power it loses to the wheels, but the percentage is always about the same give or take....


Since my math isnt that great, what do u guys think my hp & tq numbers are @ the crank on my mach that puts out 315rwhp & 327rwtq???

Mach 1's were rated @ 305rwhp & 320rwtq from the factory(IIRC). My car dyno'd 278rwhp & 294rwtq when it had nothing other than an MRT catted H, bassani catback, & C&L maf... What is the crank hp & tq #'s on that also??? Sorry guys, I am horrible @ math....
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
Car has been overheating. Not sure what is causing it. Any help would be appreciated.
  • Luckysgirl
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
72
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
Luckysgirl
L
L
93 2.3L 5 speed manual with los of power
  • leadfoot67217
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
0
Views
150
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jan 27, 2026
leadfoot67217
L
S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
256
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
B
68 coupe rear drop
  • Butchd88
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
145
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 19, 2026
C.R.M.
J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?