• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

school me on the BBK SSI intake...who's running this thing

  • Thread starter Thread starter carbed87
  • Start date Start date Nov 6, 2006

carbed87

Member
Jun 5, 2005
215
0
16
Nov 6, 2006
#1
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #1
im thinking of giving this thing a shot since im going to be building a motor soon. i was just wondering who has it, and how they like it and how easy it went on. or, just any pother info on it would be great too. thanks guys.
 
3

310stanger

New Member
Aug 15, 2006
170
1
0
Nov 6, 2006
#2
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #2
The intake has some real strong points like flow rates and the power increase. I also really like the idea of pullin valve covers without having to remove the upper intake. I have heard of pcv issues though and something to the effect of the intake suckin up oil. I dont remember the specifics but from what I got out of it the intake works better in theory then in practice. Its still a fairly new design though. Its a split port design unlike the "pizza box" box style ie holley, tfs, eddy. If your building a stroker id give the edelbrock rpm2 a real hard look. I have the tfs street but I only have a 310 ci h/c/i motor.
 
S

stangruns11s

New Member
Nov 6, 2006
0
0
0
Nov 6, 2006
#3
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #3
i have it on my 87 wiht a 347 crate motor in it havnt gotten it tuned yet due tot he fact that i am also going to change my heads but its on there with the heads i have now and even wiht out the tune i can tell a huge dif in performance over the saleen vortech intake i had on there b4 also changed tb from a 70- 75mm
 

grey5.0beast

Cookies should never be DUNKED!!!
Aug 3, 2004
0
1
0
atl ga
Nov 6, 2006
#4
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #4
Strype bought one I am pretty sure, but he hasn't installed it yet.
 

Henceforward

The Avatar Master
Founding Member
Jul 17, 2001
485
0
0
Nov 6, 2006
#5
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #5
69Clark runs a custom SSI setup on his 1995 Cobra

http://forums.stangnet.com/member.php?u=35247
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Nov 6, 2006
#6
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #6
I`d stay away from it.
It`s had some serious quality control issues.
 

spiff

Member
Aug 7, 2006
17
0
6
Canada
Nov 6, 2006
#7
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #7
8950HO said:
I`d stay away from it.
It`s had some serious quality control issues.
Click to expand...
So I have heard unfortunately.. It looks like a really nice and unique piece... And like stated above, the look and the ability to remove the valve covers is a huge bonus.
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
125
Huntsvegas, AL
Nov 6, 2006
#8
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #8
grey5.0beast said:
Strype bought one I am pretty sure, but he hasn't installed it yet.
Click to expand...

It's true... I'm lazy


8950HO said:
I`d stay away from it.
It`s had some serious quality control issues.
Click to expand...


Do tell... don't leave me hanging. From the looks I can tell you it's not very smooth on the inside, but I see no blemishes or cracks or nothing to prevent me from enjoying my new toy


If you know of a problem though LET ME KNOW before I install it!!!
 
S

speedytang

Founding Member
Jul 28, 1999
765
1
17
64
Marengo,Ohio,US
Nov 7, 2006
#9
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #9
I have installed 3 of those intakes and no problems with fit or quality of product. I have installed them all in the last 12 months so if the early units had problems not sure. 2 of the cars are Supercharger @ 10psi+ and I never heard them having a problem.
 

Adams91LX

Active Member
Dec 9, 2003
689
12
29
Plano, TX
Nov 7, 2006
#10
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #10
View attachment 426526
but it's just sooo pretty!
-a
 

carbed87

Member
Jun 5, 2005
215
0
16
Nov 7, 2006
#11
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #11
right on, thanks for the info guys... still don't know if i want to go with it though. even though pulling the valve covers without yanking the upper intake does sound pretty tantalizing.
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Nov 7, 2006
#12
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #12
Strype said:
It's true... I'm lazy





Do tell... don't leave me hanging. From the looks I can tell you it's not very smooth on the inside, but I see no blemishes or cracks or nothing to prevent me from enjoying my new toy


If you know of a problem though LET ME KNOW before I install it!!!
Click to expand...

Maybe yours is ok ,I can just go by what I`ve read in tech forums.
Going by memory one guy posted pics of one leaking coolant right through the lower casting and complained about the fuel injector and fuel rail holes being off.

One guy said his throttle body would not go on because the mounting studs were not drilled in the right position.

And they appear to have problems sucking too much oil up the PCV.
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=658342&highlight=ssi+intake

There`s probably more I`ve missed,but search on here and corral and you can find the negatives.

There is a huge thread on corral with like 27,000 views that the guy from BBK started pretty much doing damage control.
 
S

stangruns11s

New Member
Nov 6, 2006
0
0
0
Nov 7, 2006
#13
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #13
8950HO said:
Maybe yours is ok ,I can just go by what I`ve read in tech forums.
Going by memory one guy posted pics of one leaking coolant right through the lower casting and complained about the fuel injector and fuel rail holes being off.

One guy said his throttle body would not go on because the mounting studs were not drilled in the right position.

And they appear to have problems sucking too much oil up the PCV.
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=658342&highlight=ssi+intake

There`s probably more I`ve missed,but search on here and corral and you can find the negatives.

There is a huge thread on corral with like 27,000 views that the guy from BBK started pretty much doing damage control.
Click to expand...
yeah i had to send my first one back it had all kindsa holes in the lower intake 3 to be exact and didnt have the fuel rail or the tb problem but onc ei sent the 1st intake back the second one i got was fine and i heard mine was one of the first off the assembly line i orderd it way in advanced so it may have ben caught and fixed
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
41
Montgomery, NY
Nov 7, 2006
#14
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #14
I can take the valve covers off my car without removing the upper intake... is that normal???
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
39
Senoia, GA
members.cardomain.com
Nov 7, 2006
#15
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #15
I don't like the intake. It looks pretty cool, but I don't like all the 90 degree bends the airflow has to make.
 

grey5.0beast

Cookies should never be DUNKED!!!
Aug 3, 2004
0
1
0
atl ga
Nov 7, 2006
#16
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #16
Yeah but it looks so schweet. I think it's the best lookin intake on the market for sure, and I think one of the mags posted good gains wiith it.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
55
windsor, Canada
members.cardomain.com
Nov 7, 2006
#17
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #17
Majority of intakebrands will have quality issues to some degree, several have had problems with the china made products...I had more than excellent results with my typhoon. Hell I sold my RPM intake for my typhoon intake simply because I had a piss poor casting from Edelbrock..it happens, and I continue to purchase from them. The BBK like all the others is a nice peice, it will look different, work nicely.
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
34
columbus ohio
Nov 7, 2006
#18
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #18
grey5.0beast said:
Yeah but it looks so schweet. I think it's the best lookin intake on the market for sure, and I think one of the mags posted good gains wiith it.
Click to expand...

i think they look cool to, but i always have liked the look of the GT40 intakes. they look good when polished or chromed.

see below

 

Attachments

  • carshowpics016.webp
    63.2 KB · Views: 124

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
41
Montgomery, NY
Nov 7, 2006
#19
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #19
I wouldnt buy a performance part because it looked good, but then again my cars ugly, !
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
125
Huntsvegas, AL
Nov 7, 2006
#20
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #20
25thmustang said:
I wouldnt buy a performance part because it looked good, but then again my cars ugly, !
Click to expand...

Agreed. I for one didn't purchase it because of the looks... well not totally. I've just read great reviews on it and wanted something different.

I spent so much extra to get Ford Racing everything, but I wanted to be different as far as the intake. Everyone has a Cobra or GT40 or an aftermarket version of those, so I bought this one since it's up to par with the best and different than stock.

I don't know when I'll get it all put on, but expect a dyno when I finish.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
BBK SSI Crossover tube
  • yaboity
  • May 17, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
19
Views
729
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 7, 2025
yaboity
Y
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
837
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
579
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
946
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
430
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?