• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

school me on these modular motors

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2wheelryder
  • Start date Start date May 3, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
May 4, 2010
#41
  • May 4, 2010
  • #41
I found my info at mustangspecs.com
 

KBExperience

Active Member
Jun 21, 2009
466
1
49
Houston
May 4, 2010
#42
  • May 4, 2010
  • #42
I ran an 8.98 in my new edge with the mods in my sig.. And that was on street tires and it was my 3rd pass ever..
 
D

Deleted member 38176

May 4, 2010
#43
  • May 4, 2010
  • #43
fast97gt said:
I found my info at mustangspecs.com
Click to expand...

Im not sure WTF you were looking at, but I went to mustangspecs.com and this is what they have for the 1999 GT:

1999 Ford Mustang GT
0-60 mph: 5.5 sec
Quarter Mile: 14.1 sec
Click to expand...

http://www.mustangspecs.com/years/99.shtml

They even have the 96-98 Cobra's running 14 flat, only a tenth quicker than a PI GT. The NPI GT's are way behind.
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
May 4, 2010
#44
  • May 4, 2010
  • #44
My P.I gt ran a 13.8 stock with only welded in flows. Others have have squeezed out 13.7s. you said you were messing around sleeping at the light, but you reaction time has nothing to do with your et just reaction time has to do with the race with the guy next to you. You could have a 20 second reaction time and still run a 12 second pass. You et doesn't start until you roll of the staging line. Why/how would you mess around with racing and not run the car to you fullest? Bracket racing and dailing in a time is different, and I doubt you were doing this. I don't know if I have ever went to the track and not ran the hardest I could, I have always tried to get the best possible time out of my car if I go and pay to race my car. But that's me and my take on that. What's you et with your p.i. motor. Add that up, or did you downgrade from your bolt on npi to a p.i. motor

Back on to the OP congratts on the cams,
 
D

Deleted member 38176

May 4, 2010
#45
  • May 4, 2010
  • #45
BTW, fast97gt, WTF is a 2005 PI motor? Your sig states that you have one......
 
D

Deleted member 38176

May 4, 2010
#46
  • May 4, 2010
  • #46
Now I remember this kid. He's the same clueless dummy that tried convincing everyone that shorty headers are a good mod lol
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
May 4, 2010
#47
  • May 4, 2010
  • #47
Nope I did not try to convince anyone that shortys were a good mod. Its a pi motor from a 2005 crown vic smart ass, read the beging of the post replies, I simply said I'm not spend 800 or so dollars on LTs and midpipe to gain a minimal amout of hp
 
9

97predator

Member
Aug 18, 2003
302
0
16
va beach
May 4, 2010
#48
  • May 4, 2010
  • #48
With LT's and a mid pipe my car put down 255 rwhp, but that was with the slipping clutch past 3500 rpm. I haven't dynoed and tuned since the new clutch went in, but I imagine there's are a good amount of ponies left between 3500 and 5500 rpm. I wouldn't say exhaust work gives "minimal" gains.

2wheelryder:

PI cams, PI intake, 3.73 or 4.10 gears depending on highway driving, long tubes, x-pipe, cat back, tb/plenum...OR...used vortech supercharger
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
May 4, 2010
#49
  • May 4, 2010
  • #49
Hey nightfire checkout the the time for the 2002...14.7 hehehe yea you mean to tell me there's a full 7/10s of second difference between two cars that are almost mechanicly identical, with the same hp and tq, yea we need to find a site with more info, look all I said was the npi cars aren't much slower or the pi cars were that much faster. Hell you made it sound as if there was a 2sec difference in the 2 cars. The most in difference was most a full second.
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
May 4, 2010
#50
  • May 4, 2010
  • #50
fast97gt said:
Hey nightfire checkout the the time for the 2002...14.7 hehehe yea you mean to tell me there's a full 7/10s of second difference between two cars that are almost mechanicly identical, with the same hp and tq, yea we need to find a site with more info, look all I said was the npi cars aren't much slower or the pi cars were that much faster. Hell you made it sound as if there was a 2sec difference in the 2 cars. The most in difference was most a full second.
Click to expand...

It's well known that PI mustangs run low 14's stock, that 14.7 is an errant time, it had to be bad track prep or a bad driver.
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
May 4, 2010
#51
  • May 4, 2010
  • #51
If the newer P.I. motors are sooo slow then why did you put one in your car?
 

Skidzz

Tinkerbell
Apr 11, 2005
328
1
19
Salt Lake City, UT
May 4, 2010
#52
  • May 4, 2010
  • #52
Ok this is ridiculous. I was gone for a few months....did the number of newbs on here double?

EVERYONE on here who has a 4.6 should know that the PI mustangs typically run a low 14 and and NPI's run low 15's or high 14's AT BEST. This is common knowledge. There haven't been any new breakthroughs. These engines have been around for a long time and are well tested.

ninjastang125 My P.I gt ran a 13.8 stock with only welded in flows.
Click to expand...

Sorry but um......
That's never happened. I don't mean to disrespect but no NPI GT in basically stock form is going to touch 13's. Steve McQueen couldn't run a high 13 in one. It either didn't really happen, or you've got more done to your car than flows.

How has this debate gone on for 3 pages when the facts have been well known for year?
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
May 4, 2010
#53
  • May 4, 2010
  • #53
I have a P.I mustang and yes it did run 13.8. And plenty of people have done this and a few have done better. If you would read the post through it says nothing about my car being npi
 

Skidzz

Tinkerbell
Apr 11, 2005
328
1
19
Salt Lake City, UT
May 4, 2010
#54
  • May 4, 2010
  • #54
Oops, yep I just read it again and it clearly says "My PI GT..." and I even quoted that part. My mistake man. Well yea a PI can run in the high 13's stock. I've seen it several times.

Still doesn't negate the other part of my post though:

Why are so many people still arguing about this?
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
May 4, 2010
#55
  • May 4, 2010
  • #55
I never said they where sooo slow, I SAID there as fast as nightfire made it out to be. Read again there only a 7/10s to maybe a full second faster, in the 1/4. I haven't even thought about the 1/8, but anyway I agree to disagree the a full bolt on npi is slower then the stock pi car
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
May 4, 2010
#56
  • May 4, 2010
  • #56
You ran a 14.1 with bolt ons and 4.10s.. I ran a 13.8 stock, what are you trying to argue with? You need atleast a set P.I. cams, and bolt ons to run with a stock P.I car. I think 98cobra has shown what npi headed car are capable of. He was running high 13s with bolt ons, P.I cams and intake with 3.73s. There is no comparing. End of conversation.
 

Skidzz

Tinkerbell
Apr 11, 2005
328
1
19
Salt Lake City, UT
May 4, 2010
#57
  • May 4, 2010
  • #57
Not to mention 0.7-1.0 seconds is a lot in a 1/4 mile race...


I will say that a FULL bolt-on NPI would probably beat a bone stock PI, but I'm talking LT's, 4.10's, plenum/tb, and good tires. And well.....that's just not that impressive to me.
 
9

97predator

Member
Aug 18, 2003
302
0
16
va beach
May 4, 2010
#58
  • May 4, 2010
  • #58
this is proposterous
 
D

Deleted member 38176

May 4, 2010
#59
  • May 4, 2010
  • #59
97predator said:
this is proposterous
Click to expand...

Order! Order I say!
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
May 5, 2010
#60
  • May 5, 2010
  • #60
Way faster to me, is like night fire was compairing an 03-04 cobra to a n/a 4cyl foxbody, ninjasatang I never ran in the 1/4, so were u got the 14.1 from? I don't know, I ran 9.0s and 9.1s with my the npi engine in my car
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
595
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
723
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
S
Fox New to me 82 GT
  • Stangman7082
  • Jan 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 18, 2025
AeroCoupe
K
Electrical charging issue
  • knucklehead11
  • Jul 15, 2024
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
902
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 16, 2024
Mcmahst
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?