• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

SN95 Block vs Fox Body Block

  • Thread starter Thread starter Redsnake2
  • Start date Start date Oct 3, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
Dothan,Al
Oct 4, 2005
#21
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #21
from what i have heard the 94-95's didn't come with forged pistons, but did however come with forged rods......

I can't remember exactly where i read that but i will look to see if i can't find a link....SOOOO get some older pistons and newer rods, and have a forged combo.....lol




jason
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Oct 4, 2005
#22
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #22
8950HO said:
Go compare an older block from the 60`s early 70`s side by side with a roller block and we`ll see who obviously doesn`t know what he`s talking about. .
Click to expand...

I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about the mechanic who said the sn95 blocks were better than the fox blocks.

And my only point was that the blocks were similar, i.e. the heads on a 289 bolt up to a 95 5.0 and vice versa...
Scott
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Oct 4, 2005
#23
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #23
Scott_95GT said:
Hyper's don't expand with cold weather, and they are lighter. But they are not as durable as we all know.
Click to expand...

I would hope they don't expand, usually metal condenses in cold weather..

But the one good thing about hyperteunic (sp?) is that they don't expand/contract as much as forged pistons, so the hyper pistons don't slap around as much as the forged ones do.
Scott
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Oct 5, 2005
#24
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #24
mo_dingo said:
I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about the mechanic who said the sn95 blocks were better than the fox blocks.

And my only point was that the blocks were similar, i.e. the heads on a 289 bolt up to a 95 5.0 and vice versa...
Scott
Click to expand...

I know,sorry man,I misread the post ,my mistake.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Oct 5, 2005
#25
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #25
There is a TON of bad info in this thread...

First, there never, never, never was a 302 producted from the factory with forged rods. I'm not even speaking of the 5L HO motors, I mean anything that equates to 302 cubic inches.

Second, resource books are wrong - '93 5.0 motors did not have forged pistons. Hissin is right on once again...

Third, hypereutectic (which is the correct spelling by the way ) pistons have silicone contents in them to make them "softer". How silicone can ever make something harder is beyond me. Let someone throw both a forged piston and a hypereutectic piston at your head and you tell me which hurts less.

Fourth - forged pistons will do nothing for a bad tune-up besides put a bigger hole in your pocket.

Joe
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Oct 5, 2005
#26
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #26
Joes95GT said:
There is a TON of bad info in this thread...

First, there never, never, never was a 302 producted from the factory with forged rods. I'm not even speaking of the 5L HO motors, I mean anything that equates to 302 cubic inches.

Second, resource books are wrong - '93 5.0 motors did not have forged pistons. Hissin is right on once again...

Third, hypereutectic (which is the correct spelling by the way ) pistons have silicone contents in them to make them "softer". How silicone can ever make something harder is beyond me. Let someone throw both a forged piston and a hypereutectic piston at your head and you tell me which hurts less.

Fourth - forged pistons will do nothing for a bad tune-up besides put a bigger hole in your pocket.

Joe
Click to expand...

If there was never, a 302 with forged rods from the factory...then what were they made of?
I`ve read in the past that the 5.0L engines in 79-93 Mustangs came with forged steel connecting rods from the factory.
 

larrendeuce

Member
Sep 13, 2003
649
1
19
Southern NJ
Oct 5, 2005
#27
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #27
powdered metal?
 
N

Nosfurato

Founding Member
Apr 8, 2002
296
0
17
Indiana
Oct 6, 2005
#28
  • Oct 6, 2005
  • #28
I could be wrong, but I believe a cast piston will expand with heat much faster than a forged will. My understanding is, that Ford started to use cast pistons in the 302's for emissions reasons,.. im sure there may have been other factors.. but thats one that I am aware of.

I dont really think that piston weight was much of a concern to the engineers over at ford. Especially, given that the motor wasnt being taxed to the max, why would they step down to a .. forgive me. "weaker" piston. It would make more sense to stay with a forged piston due to strength,.. than have to deal with all the potential work orders.

Could it have been a cost issue?.. Im not sure. possibly. I mean, a couple bucks here and there saved on a car doesnt sound like a whole lot, but when you have a production run of around 100k units?.. it adds up.

However, the point has been made previously in this post. The hyper pistons are what you would call a weak piston,.. they are just less tollerant to detonation.
In my opinion, if your tune is safe, and you are looking for some pretty big power. (more than 500 HP) your pistons arent going to be the weakest link. The block is. Wich leads us all the way back to why this thread was started in the first place.

There is 0 difference between the fox body blocks, and the SN95 blocks. ok, maybe a couple of them have stray hairs from plant workers within them lol but seriously, there is nothing that makes them and better than each other.

Some people think that some of the older fox body blocks, commonly referred to as mexican blocks. (where they where created) have a slightly higher nickel content, and therefore are a bit stronger.. but, as far as I know, that hasnt really been verrified, and is still pretty much under speculation.

Personally, I wouldnt worry about much of the bottom end of a stock motor, maybe put some good rod bolts in it, but thats about it. If your talkin 450-500 horse, on a safe tune, and you dont beat the crap out of it on a daily bassis. you should be fine with stock stuff.

If you go much beyond 500 HP, then its time to start thinking about a better block.

Ive been in the game a while now, I dont claim to be 100% accurate on everything above, as I am by no means a Ford engineer. But, hopefully, this little book may have helped some people with a few questions lol

Until next time.
 
9

95GTAODE

New Member
Nov 25, 2004
200
2
0
Oct 6, 2005
#29
  • Oct 6, 2005
  • #29
Actually, Mexican blocks were made in Mexico for Mexican use, the blocks in a fox body, or most anyother North American Ford were all made in the U.S.

Ford switched to Hypers because they produce less or no cold slap, and they can run tighter tolerances with them. They are also cheaper. The ONLY disadvantage to a Hyper piston is that they will withstand very little detonation before breaking. The only advantage to a factory forged piston in an FI or juiced engine is that they will take a little more before they break, but they WILL break.

Yes, early and Mexican blocks are built with a little more metal, but unless you like living dangerously and pushing things right to the edge, they offer no real advantage over a late roller block, you might get another 50 or so horsepower out of one before it too breaks.

As far as rods go, Windsor engines(289-351), have had factory forged rods since day one. They are nowhere near the quality of an aftermarket forged rod, but they are forged.

I hope that clears everything up!
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Oct 6, 2005
#30
  • Oct 6, 2005
  • #30
larrendeuce said:
powdered metal?
Click to expand...

I believe the 4.6L engines, (except the supercharged 4.6L Cobra engines), use the powdered metal rods.
 

DougNuts

Founding Member
Jul 11, 2000
2,596
0
47
Georgetown Ky
Oct 6, 2005
#31
  • Oct 6, 2005
  • #31
http://www.aa1car.com/library/2003/eb40354.htm

Everyone who wants to know about pistons needs to read the above link. If you don't understand a word, like hypereutectic vs. hypoeutectic then google it. There are a LOT of variables to a piston other than whether it's cast or forged.

My dad works at Mahle (maker of 33% of the pistons on the road), so if you have questions, I have answers.
 

loud 95

New Member
May 29, 2003
562
0
0
Milwaukie, OR
Oct 6, 2005
#32
  • Oct 6, 2005
  • #32
SMOKEDYA said:
the only diffrence i've ever heard of was that the S/N's had hyperstethic pistons???? peace



john
Click to expand...

 
N

Nosfurato

Founding Member
Apr 8, 2002
296
0
17
Indiana
Oct 7, 2005
#33
  • Oct 7, 2005
  • #33
"Some people think that some of the older fox body blocks, commonly referred to as mexican blocks. (where they where created) have a slightly higher nickel content, and therefore are a bit stronger.. but, as far as I know, that hasnt really been verrified, and is still pretty much under speculation."

Sorry dude, I have to do this. notice that I said "some" of them.. and I also mentioned where the "some" where produced. I never said they where made for american stangs.. possibly my bad.. I was speaking of blocks in general, and how they are commonly reffered to.

"Ford switched to Hypers because they produce less or no cold slap"

Is that possibly because of ( My Post) "I could be wrong, but I believe a cast piston will expand with heat much faster than a forged will." I.E. it will seal the combustion chamber faster during warmup.

As far as pistons go, like I said before, forged or not, as long as the tune is solid, they are NOT the weak link in the motor.

As for the stock rods?.. I dunno,.. I have never heard of a stock rod breaking before the block does.


Im not trying to start a war, just doing my best to clarify, and stand my gound.



my $ .02


95GTAODE said:
Actually, Mexican blocks were made in Mexico for Mexican use, the blocks in a fox body, or most anyother North American Ford were all made in the U.S.

Ford switched to Hypers because they produce less or no cold slap, and they can run tighter tolerances with them. They are also cheaper. The ONLY disadvantage to a Hyper piston is that they will withstand very little detonation before breaking. The only advantage to a factory forged piston in an FI or juiced engine is that they will take a little more before they break, but they WILL break.

Yes, early and Mexican blocks are built with a little more metal, but unless you like living dangerously and pushing things right to the edge, they offer no real advantage over a late roller block, you might get another 50 or so horsepower out of one before it too breaks.

As far as rods go, Windsor engines(289-351), have had factory forged rods since day one. They are nowhere near the quality of an aftermarket forged rod, but they are forged.

I hope that clears everything up!
Click to expand...
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Oct 7, 2005
#34
  • Oct 7, 2005
  • #34
Great thread! Sounds like:

#1 our blocks can handle up to 450-500HP. What breaks? The block itself? I have ARP rod bolts. Does this mean I can handle more HP?
#2 The connecting rods are forged.
#3 Ain't all that much difference between hyp vs forged pistons anyway to matter.
#4 Your mechanic is wrong.
#5 Related question..Is it true that the 4.6 blocks can handle TWICE HP that ours can handle??
 
9

95GTAODE

New Member
Nov 25, 2004
200
2
0
Oct 7, 2005
#35
  • Oct 7, 2005
  • #35
Nosfurato, I think I just interpreted some of your post wrong.

Pokageek, The block will generally break first. They usually split down the lifter valley. It is possible to break pistons, rods, and the crank, but that is usually caused by another factor, like detonation or pistons hitting valves. Unfortunately, it's true that a stock Mod motor block can handle at least twice that of a 5.0.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
834
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
8K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?