• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

SN95 suspension

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monte_Dono
  • Start date Start date Jun 3, 2021
  • Tags Tags
    foxbody sn95 suspension
M

Monte_Dono

Member
Jun 3, 2021
4
1
13
Alberta
Jun 3, 2021
#1
  • Jun 3, 2021
  • #1
I just bought an '87 lx and it's pretty beat i was wondering what all it takes to put an sn95 suspension setup in it, is it worth it? I've heard it can give you a wider track width, if so, how much wider? and how available are parts? im looking to upgrade to a 3.55 diff ratio, can anyone help me?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,176
17,878
224
Massachusetts
Jun 3, 2021
#2
  • Jun 3, 2021
  • #2
There are only minor differences between the Sn95 and Fox suspension. Most of the parts are somewhat interchangeable with minor differences. Those differences don't justify the extra effort to use Sn95 parts over fox parts, so stick with Fox parts. Springs will interchange, shocks/struts, control arms, etc.

The parts that give the Sn95 the wider suspension are the front control arms (3/4" longer) and the rear disk brakes which add 3/4" each side to clear the ABS tone rings.

With the front control arms, adding that extra 3/4" usually translates to extreme camber because the top strout mounts cannot move out far enough to compensate. Out back, the wider leads leads to wheel fitment issues.

What is our goal in mind here?
 
M

Monte_Dono

Member
Jun 3, 2021
4
1
13
Alberta
Jun 3, 2021
#3
  • Jun 3, 2021
  • #3
Mustang5L5 said:
There are only minor differences between the Sn95 and Fox suspension. Most of the parts are somewhat interchangeable with minor differences. Those differences don't justify the extra effort to use Sn95 parts over fox parts, so stick with Fox parts. Springs will interchange, shocks/struts, control arms, etc.

The parts that give the Sn95 the wider suspension are the front control arms (3/4" longer) and the rear disk brakes which add 3/4" each side to clear the ABS tone rings.

With the front control arms, adding that extra 3/4" usually translates to extreme camber because the top strout mounts cannot move out far enough to compensate. Out back, the wider leads leads to wheel fitment issues.

What is our goal in mind here?
Click to expand...
Our goal is a build that can haul ass and look sick at doing it
 
Reactions: General karthief
M

Monte_Dono

Member
Jun 3, 2021
4
1
13
Alberta
Jun 3, 2021
#4
  • Jun 3, 2021
  • #4
Monte_Dono said:
Our goal is a build that can haul ass and look sick at doing it
Click to expand...
I want the end 95 specifically for the poke and camber
 
M

Monte_Dono

Member
Jun 3, 2021
4
1
13
Alberta
Jun 3, 2021
#5
  • Jun 3, 2021
  • #5
Monte_Dono said:
I want the end 95 specifically for the poke and camber
Click to expand...
Plus the disc brakes and 5 lug hubs
 

Chythar

Recently finished repairing my rear
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2004
2,373
140
113
Foothill Ranch, CA
Jun 3, 2021
#6
  • Jun 3, 2021
  • #6
Mustang5L5 said:
With the front control arms, adding that extra 3/4" usually translates to extreme camber because the top strut mounts cannot move out far enough to compensate.
Click to expand...

I had the same issue on my 94 Cobra clone, though I have the 03/04 Cobra front control arms which adds another 3/4" over stock. I fixed it with an adjustable camber bolt on each side; replace the top bolt where the shock attaches to the spindle, and adjust it out the maximum amount. That's all I needed to get my camber back in line and I have no problems getting a front alignment within specs. Had them in for more than a decade now, no issues.

There are plenty of these adjustable camber bolts available, just search Google for 'camber bolt mustang'.
 
Last edited: Jun 3, 2021
Reactions: 90sickfox
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
606
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
388
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
P
Drive train sourcing
  • Patk
  • Apr 25, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
996
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2024
limp
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?