• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Someone that knows a lot about reading dyno graphs...check these out plz

  • Thread starter Thread starter Imyourzero
  • Start date Start date May 9, 2004

Imyourzero

Learned that lesson as a horny teenager with lots
Founding Member
Mar 10, 2002
2,298
0
0
Hoonose, U.S.A. Posts: 39,051
May 9, 2004
#1
  • May 9, 2004
  • #1
What do you think of these?





The first one is STD and the second is SAE. These graphs are of someone's 1994 Cobra that has the same heads, cam, and exhaust as I do. Well I don't have the heads on yet but you get the idea. I suppose my graph should look similar after the heads are installed, but he is running the stock Cobra intake and I have a Performer, if that matters much. He does not have a chip, and the car is untuned AFAIK. He is running a stock 94 Cobra computer...so don't pay too much attention to the A/F ratio.

Basically I want to know if the XE270HR cam he is using is making good power with the heads, or if there is a lot of improvement to be seen by going with a custom camshaft. I haven't seen enough dyno sheets to make an informed decision...
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
May 9, 2004
#2
  • May 9, 2004
  • #2
Nice numbers - the cam seems to work very well with that combo.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
May 9, 2004
#3
  • May 9, 2004
  • #3
leave the cam. make sure its tuned unlike his.

all the xecomp cams I have seen that have any size run badass. and have put down better numbers than most custom cams I have seen.
 

Imyourzero

Learned that lesson as a horny teenager with lots
Founding Member
Mar 10, 2002
2,298
0
0
Hoonose, U.S.A. Posts: 39,051
May 9, 2004
#4
  • May 9, 2004
  • #4
Damn fellas thanks, that's what I want to hear!!

Yeah I've been extremely pleased with my cam! I could have gone bigger, but I was scared of drivability. I'm getting .544 lift with the 1.7's and it's awesome as can be on the street. That power curve above looked really nice so I wanted to see what you guys thought.

I was talking to someone on another forum that ran a Crower 15511 against one of Ed's cams. He said Ed's cam made 10hp/10tq more under the curve, but fell off sooner @ 5200 rpm. He said the Crower kept pulling until 5500 but made 10/10 less under the curve. My first thought was "For $325, I could make up that 10hp elsewhere..."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?