Low-5.0 said:So it has to be a convertible that you can drive year round and still has some get up and go.....How about an early 90's full size Bronco with a 351W?
Low-5.0 said:Audi TT?
xr8d302 said:the S2000 will not look cool. It will look like a honda parked next to a mustang.
Low-5.0 said:
Low-5.0 said:I've never driven an S2000, but I will tell you what I know from reading about them. Peak HP is somewhere around 8-9K, and Im sure they are lacking low end torque as practically all honda's seem to do. I do kinda like the way that first black one looks but, I certainly wouldn't trade your mustang for it tho, unless you want to get into road racing/autocross.
Caldwell said:No you're right, the torque definitely won't be there. But i'm sure its get up and go will still be present.
it has 240 horse with about 160 ft/lbs torque
and it will run the 1/4 mile faster than my mustang will now at 14.2secs at 99.9mph.
I've really limited myself to cars because of my price range and specifications (vert)
but at least i can get one for well under $40G
this pic makes me want a red one
nmcgrawj said:Well after driving z4's and the rest of BMW's line up, i cant STAND how CRAMPED it is. Im 6'2", so im not sure how tall/big u are, but i could never have that car to cram myself into every day.
And it just doesnt feel safe, i feel like if i got into an accident in the front, my feet were gonna get smashed, and from the back, my back was gonna get smashed. Lol this probably isnt true but its just the feeling i get.
It seems like there are other reasons u want to get rid of the stang because there are plenty of ways to keep it and not have to have it be a year rounder.
I wont try to convince you...i know u will wake up soon enough. I'll send a prayer to the Stang Gods tonight for you
AaronG said:I'll be honest; I've ridden in a 2001 S2K with nothing more than an ACT clutch and was extremely impressed, it doesn't have a hard time throwing your head back in the seat. That 8k rpm comes up REAL fast. Neat cars.
GRGT1994 said:Hey, if that's what moves ya. But you gotta know you will be outgrowing either the honda or the z4 in a few years.
I still say, keep the 'stang and get a nice 4 door sedan that moves. There are plenty out there.
BTW, as C&D says, you gotta drive those s2000's like you stole em to get them to move any faster than a sedate pace. It's not that they are light on torque, it's that they have NO torque.
Either way, hope you enjoy.
xr8d302 said:I just talked to God on the phone, he says if you sell the mustang that he's gonna hit you with some "mutha ****in hot lightning"
Don't shoot the messenger.....
Kevin R. said:I wish I could own an S2000. Driving them at the dealership I work at is a treat.
A very nice automobile, although a little overrated on the horsepower, and even in the higher RPM's, it still left me wanting more.
The cockpit feel in those is sick and I feel like I could take turns at 100 in that thing.
Small car + RWD = YAY.
I'd say S2000 > Gay Z4.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?