Sound Difference: Pro Chamber vs. BBK O/R H

95strokerPSU said:
Is this a fact? Even if you get the pro chamber meant for long tube headers? I guess I could always take it to a muffler shop and have them make it work. Any idea how much custom fabbing would be required to make the pro chamber fit with BBK LTs?


It is a fact. I have the pictures at home. I want to say mac long tubes are wider at the collectors than bbks...might be the other way around. I think you could cut half the pipe and bend it...then have it re-welded. Either way, unless the design of them has changed...it aint gonna bolt up. I have the pictures at home on my computer showing this.


I would go with the cheaper D-pipe anyway:banana:
 
Whats your setup right now?

3 chamber flows + summit o/r H. It's loud but not crazy loud. But it's still louder than I think I want. I just want something that doesn't get all raspy in the top end. I've heard the Borla catback in person and it was sweet, but talk about $$$.

But I've only heard mine with the stock headers. I'm putting in BBK shorties with the new combo so I don't know how it will change the sound. Plus the new heads and cam will probably change the sound even more, so we will see.
 
Zero Signal said:
3 chamber flows + summit o/r H. It's loud but not crazy loud. But it's still louder than I think I want. I just want something that doesn't get all raspy in the top end. I've heard the Borla catback in person and it was sweet, but talk about $$$.

But I've only heard mine with the stock headers. I'm putting in BBK shorties with the new combo so I don't know how it will change the sound. Plus the new heads and cam will probably change the sound even more, so we will see.


are long tubes not a possibility? I love the deeper sound of them.