• Mustang Forums
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum

Steve's Megasquirt/tunerstudio Help Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter hoopty5.0
  • Start date Start date Jan 12, 2016
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • …
  • 69
Next
First Prev 26 of 69 Next Last

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Dec 4, 2016
#501
  • Dec 4, 2016
  • #501
I'll try it out Saturday. So...I should have 10° mechanical with 10° offset for 20° fixed ? I don't understand where 24° comes from. I've got to read the manual again. Smh
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Dec 4, 2016
#502
  • Dec 4, 2016
  • #502
24* was just used as an example.
you should have 20* fixed with 10*offset and10*mechanical
the 20* is what the MS is commanding as total timing but you have 10* mechanical
that would give you 30*.... so there is an offset in the program it "offsets" the timing (read subtracts) 10* to give you a true 20* total.
The way you have yours setup now will probably work I just don't know how the engine will react with that little cranking timing.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Dec 5, 2016
#503
  • Dec 5, 2016
  • #503
a91what said:
24* was just used as an example.
you should have 20* fixed with 10*offset and10*mechanical
the 20* is what the MS is commanding as total timing but you have 10* mechanical
that would give you 30*.... so there is an offset in the program it "offsets" the timing (read subtracts) 10* to give you a true 20* total.
The way you have yours setup now will probably work I just don't know how the engine will react with that little cranking timing.
Click to expand...
OK...I got it. [emoji106]

I'll adjust it this weekend- don't want to wake the neighbors.
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Dec 11, 2016
#504
  • Dec 11, 2016
  • #504
My car has a surge at idle after doing WUE auto tune. My AFR readings did drop to about 14.3 warm 170 degrees. I didn't have time to reset the timing. Here's a log. Any feedback would greatly be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • after1stautotunewue2016-12-11_16.19.46.msl
    after1stautotunewue2016-12-11_16.19.46.msl
    1.8 MB · Views: 200

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Dec 12, 2016
#505
  • Dec 12, 2016
  • #505
Thought about it and researched a bit. I think my issue is timing related....and the fact that my AFR table is changed from the one you sent me. Compare Tune is a life saver.

I should've left that stuff alone and focused on timing first. Live and learn.

I'm going to live like I don't actually like my neighbors tonite. Setting timing with 10° offset and straightening out the AFR table when I get home.....as long as its not raining.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT and a91what

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Dec 12, 2016
#506
  • Dec 12, 2016
  • #506
Couldn't do it.... Wife said no....darn it. She stopped me heading out the door with the laptop. I'll post as soon as I can make some changes.
 

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,739
3,188
203
Taylorsville ky
Dec 12, 2016
#507
  • Dec 12, 2016
  • #507
90sickfox said:
Couldn't do it.... Wife said no....darn it. She stopped me heading out the door with the laptop. I'll post as soon as I can make some changes.
Click to expand...

Man,you are gonna have to work on your stealthy ninja skills...lol
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

stanglx2002

CT Material here
15 Year Member
Jul 7, 2005
1,563
1,110
164
Dec 16, 2016
#508
  • Dec 16, 2016
  • #508
I am having some real trouble with accel enrichment table. It keeps bucking/popping bc of it going lean. I cant figure out how to get it to level out.

Any help would be appreciated
 

Attachments

  • 2016-12-13_18.52.00 - Enabled Accel Enrichment.msq
    2016-12-13_18.52.00 - Enabled Accel Enrichment.msq
    119.2 KB · Views: 242
  • 2016-12-16_16.25.58.msl
    2016-12-16_16.25.58.msl
    2.6 MB · Views: 209

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Dec 16, 2016
#509
  • Dec 16, 2016
  • #509
stanglx2002 said:
I am having some real trouble with accel enrichment table. It keeps bucking/popping bc of it going lean. I cant figure out how to get it to level out.

Any help would be appreciated
Click to expand...
Drop the coin into the slot.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Dec 16, 2016
#510
  • Dec 16, 2016
  • #510
Ae is simple it's accel ms vs tps dot. Tps dot is how fast the pedal is depressed.

The actual graph I cannot tell you how to layout it's different between engines.


Your issue may be one of many things...
-Accel end pulse width needs to be 0
-accel pulse width 0.3
-accel taper 0.1
Tps dot% 10%
The rest can be left alone.

Turn the wot accel off. It causes problems

THE ONLY ACCEL SETTING THAT SHOULD BE ENABLED IS TIME BASED ACCEL ENRICHMENT.

Beyond this I would have to actually tune the setting myself to help you further.
 

stanglx2002

CT Material here
15 Year Member
Jul 7, 2005
1,563
1,110
164
Dec 17, 2016
#511
  • Dec 17, 2016
  • #511
I had those original settings but it didn't work. I also disabled the wot accel per the diyautotune guys advice. That didn't help either. I have been increasing and decreasing added % just making it even richer or just lean throughout the tip-in.

I am for sure 100% TPS as I read to many issues with MAP based.

What is your MAP and TPS Lag Factor set to?

I was having erratic tpsdot issue, but then changed the Lag Factor from 50 to 95 and it made it so much better. I was going to change the MAP settings to 95 too to see if that helps. I think my VE Table on the upper ranges needs more work bc when I get on the throttle the dot on the VE table moves sideways and not up and then over, so my thought is its 50% Lag Factor is smoothing the MAP signal to much (reason for increasing to 95) so its not getting into the upper ranges of my table where it would richen the mixture making it lean.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited: Dec 17, 2016

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Dec 17, 2016
#512
  • Dec 17, 2016
  • #512
The only time you use map for ae is when you do not have a tps.

Put the sliding bar all the way to the right.
You want 100%tps with NO MAP BLEND.

If your tps is noisy find out why, most likely you have an ignition source to close to the wiring. Make sure the plug wires are routed away from the harness.
 

stanglx2002

CT Material here
15 Year Member
Jul 7, 2005
1,563
1,110
164
Dec 17, 2016
#513
  • Dec 17, 2016
  • #513
The sliding bar is all the way to the right at 100% TPS based. I have NO MAP AE at all.

The TPS signal is clean. It was the TPSDot that was erratic. The Lag Factor under the General Settings was set to 50% making it slow and bouncy, so after some reading on msextra I saw others change the Lag Factor to 95-100% so the computer wasn't trying to smooth the signal.

What do you have your Lag Factors set too?

When I hit the throttle the Map kpa doesn't get above 50%, which I am assuming is incorrect making it hard for the tip-in to richen the mixture. That's why I was asking about the Lag Factors, since I think it maybe doing the same as my TPS was.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Dec 17, 2016
#514
  • Dec 17, 2016
  • #514
If your map kpa does not achieve 90+ at wot then you have the map sensor calibration incorrect
 

stanglx2002

CT Material here
15 Year Member
Jul 7, 2005
1,563
1,110
164
Dec 17, 2016
#515
  • Dec 17, 2016
  • #515
Do you by chance have the settings? I run a MSPNP2 with version 3.4.2 if that helps

My settings are:

Map
- Custom 0.0V = 9.3 5V = 260.9

Baro
- Custom 0.0V = 9.3 5V = 260.9

Correction
- Total Vaccuum = 147 Rate = -47
 
Last edited: Dec 17, 2016

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Dec 17, 2016
#516
  • Dec 17, 2016
  • #516
Why are they set that way? That hasn't been used since 3.1.1 code.

I answer from memory while I'm on my phone I can get the info off my laptop later.
 

stanglx2002

CT Material here
15 Year Member
Jul 7, 2005
1,563
1,110
164
Dec 17, 2016
#517
  • Dec 17, 2016
  • #517
I went looking at the calibration settings per your advice. It looks to be the base tune I was using was setup for the standard 2.5 Map/Baro Sensor. The MSPNP2 from diyautotune is upgraded to the MapDaddy 4 Bar Sensor making my calibration very WRONG. I plugged the computer in and the MAP was reading 66 with just the key on. I changed the calibration to the MapDaddy (MPXH6400) for both Map and Baro, set the Barometric Correction to both 0 and the Curve to 100%, and set the Barometric Correction to "Two Independent Sensors" per the MapDaddy instructions.

Now that I did this I updated the tune on the computer, and turned the key on. It now reads 97.2, which is HUGE. Time to start all over again tuning since my VE Table is all wrong.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Dec 17, 2016
#518
  • Dec 17, 2016
  • #518
Very good. Now the baro sensor is not the same as the map. They may be one unit but they are not the same. I believe (from memory) the baro should be the mx4150?
 

stanglx2002

CT Material here
15 Year Member
Jul 7, 2005
1,563
1,110
164
Dec 17, 2016
#519
  • Dec 17, 2016
  • #519
I understand they are different. Baro = elevation and the MAP = atmosphere vacuum/pressure

I will be calling DIYAutotune on Monday to ask what they use in the MSPNP2.

Drove the car 4-5 more times after rescaling everything running Autotune. Its getting a lot better, but after re-enabling AE its goes for a sec and then falls on its face (goes lean for about 2 sec) then goes back to normal. I assume I needed to add a little Taper time to compensate for the issue.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Dec 17, 2016
#520
  • Dec 17, 2016
  • #520
No I mean the calibration for each is different. It's two separate sensors in one package.

You calibrated the MAP correctly

The baro uses a separate calibration I believe it's the mx4150

Do this, with the car off turn the key on and hookup TS.

Setup 2 gauges one for map and the other baro.
(On the TS gauge cluster)

They should read within .1 of each other kpa wise, With the engine off.
If they don't change the baro calibration to a different sensor, it's on the list.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • …
  • 69
Next
First Prev 26 of 69 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
496
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
TB Injection Install (Aces Killshot)
  • LILCBRA
  • Feb 5, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 4 5 6
Replies
119
Views
21K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Dec 1, 2024
LILCBRA
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
2006 Mustang GT Turbo Build - Megasquirt?
  • mclang
  • Oct 2, 2020
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Oct 4, 2020
mclang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?