• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Stocks heads with Cam

  • Thread starter Thread starter notched88
  • Start date Start date Aug 17, 2007
N

notched88

New Member
Apr 3, 2007
2
0
0
Aug 17, 2007
#1
  • Aug 17, 2007
  • #1
Whats the biggest cam i can go with while still using the stock heads, and what rockers best suite that cam? The car is basically stock with the exception of exhaust/intake and im looking for the most power, im not concerned about the idle as it doesnt bother me. Thanks
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
Aug 17, 2007
#2
  • Aug 17, 2007
  • #2
notched88 said:
Whats the biggest cam i can go with while still using the stock heads, and what rockers best suite that cam? The car is basically stock with the exception of exhaust/intake and im looking for the most power, im not concerned about the idle as it doesnt bother me. Thanks
Click to expand...

the stock springs cant handle much lift. i say use a b-cam. there good cams and wil lwork with stock components. and the stock rockers work great.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Aug 17, 2007
#3
  • Aug 17, 2007
  • #3
Personally, I'd save the money for heads/intake first. The cam is the last thing I'd touch. You really won't gain much of anything from a cam swap with stock heads other than a lumpy idle.
 
B

BYRDPE

Founding Member
Nov 4, 1998
1,556
0
37
Memphis,Tn.
Aug 17, 2007
#4
  • Aug 17, 2007
  • #4
NKau said:
Personally, I'd save the money for heads/intake first. The cam is the last thing I'd touch. You really won't gain much of anything from a cam swap with stock heads other than a lumpy idle.
Click to expand...

What ^ he said.
Do it once and you'll be a happy camper.
Get a set of heads,intake and a cam to match.
 

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
Aug 18, 2007
#5
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #5
lol you could actually make the car slower by camming a stock head motor.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Aug 18, 2007
#6
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #6
Aliate X said:
lol you could actually make the car slower by camming a stock head motor.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure my notch was slower when I bought it than it would have been with the factory HO cam. Motor was totally stock but for a TFS-1 cam. Car was trapping 97 mph, which is OK for a stocker with a 5-speed, but had absolutely no bottom end below 1600, and actually seemed to fall off worse than a stock cammed motor above 4K rpm.
 
F

FordGuy88

New Member
Nov 15, 2004
241
0
0
Park Ridge, IL
Aug 18, 2007
#7
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #7
Yeah I would go with heads and a cam. You can pick up a set of ported E7s or GT40Ps for cheap. But I have heard good things about the E303 cam and also the TricFlow stage 1 cam. But if you going to put in a cam put a set of valve springs in too. If you need some I have some with no miles for cheap. PM me for details.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Aug 18, 2007
#8
  • Aug 18, 2007
  • #8
Aliate X said:
lol you could actually make the car slower by camming a stock head motor.
Click to expand...

Yep. Leave it until you can afford heads.
 
C

coolmanclyde

New Member
Aug 16, 2007
2
0
0
Aug 19, 2007
#9
  • Aug 19, 2007
  • #9
I have also installed the TFS-1 cam on my stock E7 heads, and it seems like I have a better top end but slow bottom end. Seemed like somewhat of a gain after install, although I was never just blown away!
I am going to install some GT-40s, port match with my lower cobra intake and install some 1.7 RR's.
Before the cam and headers I had 220 rwhp, havent dynoed since the cam but would only expect 240....maybe. I plan to dyno after my head and RR's and can only hope for 275!
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Aug 20, 2007
#10
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #10
The stock 5.0 cam is very good, making it one of the last things I would change. I would look at the heads intake and headers. For a budget build I would say GT40 heads, GT40 intake, and BBK headers "ebay" You will not beat them with out spending more money.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Aug 20, 2007
#11
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #11
Agreed.. the cam should be the last thing... that being said, the stock heads will need a spring up grade for any thing!! then keep the cam under .500 lift and install the cams in at 4-6* advanced to help with the lowend..( depending on camshaft used of course)

Springs.. camshaft.. timing chain assy and you will see a gain.. and when the Heads get there you will love the increase!! Ported E7s/ GT40s/ or P s will work great!!

Just me.................................

Thumper
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Sep 5, 2007
#12
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #12
have thumper460 port your heads
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Sep 5, 2007
#13
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #13
Aliate X said:
lol you could actually make the car slower by camming a stock head motor.
Click to expand...

Yep.....cam should be the last thing you throw in there!
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Sep 5, 2007
#14
  • Sep 5, 2007
  • #14
It is odd but camming these 302's without doing anything to the heads or intake is silly. Most other engines you will pick up some power but Ford did a very good job of matching the cam to intake and heads. You basically should be doing all 3 as a package.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
616
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 19, 2026
spencergt66
S
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
405
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
719
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Engine Pushrod Length?
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
353
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?