• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Suggestions on Upper and Lower manifold

  • Thread starter Thread starter philly3384
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2005
P

philly3384

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
6
0
0
Apr 11, 2005
#1
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #1
I have a 95 cobra with edelbrock performer heads, e cam, full msd ignition,75mm mass air with a 65mm throttle body but wiill be getting either 70mm or 75mm with manifold...What upper and lower manifold should i go with? I want my most bang for my buck... im gunna stay N/A so there wont be a supercharger either so i want this to be atleast a decent upgrade and not something that is a lil better then the cobra one.i already have... any suggestions would be great .thanks alot.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Apr 11, 2005
#2
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #2
Since you don't want to use the Cobra, I'd suggest a Performer or RPM.
 

darthcual

Member
Mar 31, 2005
985
19
18
Arlington, TX
Apr 11, 2005
#3
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #3
I agree with tmoss, edlebrock performer or rpm if you want something w/ power on the higher end of rpm range will be the best bang for the buck. I believe they come with a 75mm opening. Hope that helps.

DC
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Apr 11, 2005
#4
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #4
Since you have the edelbrock heads, I say go with the performer or RPM. You can also go with a trick flow or a holley but there is something nice about a complete set. Especially since the flow differences are fairly minor.
Kevin
 
M

mustang_2099

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
25
0
0
Camrose AB, Canada
Apr 11, 2005
#5
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #5
I also would say edelbrock, but make sure you get something you also like to look at, meaning if you cant stand the look of the performer get the rpm and vise versa ( you could move to others as well) you wont be happy. The reason i say this is becaus i didn't like the rpm or performer ( or the holly or Trick flows for that matter) so I got the RPM II and even though some say it isnt best for the performace aspect I love that intake, and would pick it 10 times over.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
SOLD Trick Flow 351w R series EFI manifold upper and lower NEW In BOX NEVER installed
  • Hizdudeness
  • Mar 6, 2024
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
3K
Engine and Power Adder Mar 6, 2024
Hizdudeness
H
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?