• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

The Most Preferred Aluminum heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter SSnakeGT127
  • Start date Start date Mar 9, 2021
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

SSnakeGT127

15 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
44
25
28
VA
Mar 9, 2021
#1
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #1
Hey everyone, how's it going, I know this has been a forever on going topic, but really would like some advice/help on a decision that I'm currently progressing with my build.

- Quick recap, the bottom end of my 306 in my Fox is more or less on its way out, (burning oil, carbon burn plugs, smoking moderately, signs of piston rings) etc.

So I picked up a 302 shortblock (from a 2001 Ford Explorer 5.0) that I sent out to a machine shop and to have it honed / freshen up, with new components.

everything is great, It's just now I'm somewhat stuck on what to decide on which heads to go with my motor, which is still a stock OEM bottom end, ( just a new fresh rebuild)

Also noted I also have a Trickflow Stage 2 cam that I have to go with it, just now debating to go with either AFR -165, Trickflow 170s or maybe Promaxx or GT40 (If I were to go on a budget) but most important know what would most likely work with my stock piston ( definitely checking the PTV clearance beforehand)

I'm basically putting my old setup on the new shortblock, just with the added on new cam (TFS Stage 2) and the aluminum heads that I'm debating on getting.

My setup is primarily this
- 650 Holley Carb ( have a spare 750 carb to use If necessary )
- Ford racing dual plane Intake
- headers /2.5 inch off road exhaust / 10 series Flows)
- aluminum Heads / Cam
- T5 5speed
- 3: 73 gears (May go with 4.10s or 4.30 but still on the fence)

Main goal is to have a nice stout 302 that will either hit between 280- 320rwhp, or have the Ingredients to hit high 12s and I'll be happy for the most part.

What would be your preferred Aluminum head setup to go with a basic 302 build, AFR, Trickflow, Brodix, Promaxx? I greatly appreciate any input/advice.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
Hillsborough county
Mar 9, 2021
#2
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #2
What is the budget? we need to know what you are capable of spending before we can give advice.

I run the proxaxx 190cc heads and like them, however AFR has recently released the defender series heads that flow near identical numbers as the promaxx at a similar price.
 
Reactions: SSnakeGT127

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Mar 9, 2021
#3
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #3
A 750 carb will not help power or driveability. Even at 7000 RPM, a NA 302 will not be choked by a 650 carb. Nitrous, a turbo or blower will change the VE, but with awesome heads and a carb, it will not go over 100%. 90% is not a bad figure for a streetable, prepped engine. Have fun playing with the calculator.

Carburetor CFM Calculator - Find Recommended Carburetor Size

Find the recommended carburetor size for your engine using the carburetor CFM calculator, plus see the formula for finding the idea carb CFM.
www.inchcalculator.com
 

Attachments

  • 6E91F6F0-C74F-433D-8DF7-0720C51A390D.webp
    41.8 KB · Views: 304
Reactions: revhead347, General karthief, SSnakeGT127 and 1 other person

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Mar 9, 2021
#4
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #4
I've got the TF twisted wedge 170s but my pistons aren't stock. Trick flow is proven but the Promax is showing to be a great bang for the buck. Guess you want to know what heads people have with stock pistons ?
 

SSnakeGT127

15 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
44
25
28
VA
Mar 9, 2021
#5
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #5
My old motor that's in it right now was from another guy, which had the Proform 750 carb on it, at one point was running a 100-150 shot nitrous on it from what I'm told, and I figured it would be too much for a given street driven 302., probably wash the rings if anything, took that off and put the holley 650 on it, just saying I have it as spare just in case, but highly doubt I'll need for this setup.

Budget wise, I'm looking anywhere from 1K- 2k for heads, I'm in a position where I can grab a decent set I hope for in that range that will work with my stock bottom end and cam.

Only thing is, it seems that past months the most heads on different sites (Trickflow, AFR) are back ordered at the moment so I'm taking that in account as well to see which would be available soonest, or heck, go order the heads from FTI, but still not sure on availability as well.

Yes I heard great results on the Promax 180 heads, even talk to a guy that ran a 11.80 on it with his 86 Fox, he has a custom cam in his motor

Yes exactly, mainly who had success with which heads that worked with their stock pistons.
 
Last edited: Mar 9, 2021

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,255
17,938
224
Massachusetts
Mar 9, 2021
#6
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #6
I’ve got TFS170s with stock Pistons. I’m using a custom grind cam.

my combo wasn’t built with high HP or fast ETs in mind however.
 

HemiRick

I'd be looking at jacking under the house
Jun 28, 2020
723
272
73
Memphis TN
Mar 9, 2021
#7
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #7
I recently installed a set of the Blueprint SBF heads and am very happy w them. I did buy bare heads and build them.
 

Habu135

5 Year Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,223
780
133
California
Mar 9, 2021
#8
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #8
I would say AFR heads are the best, but there are lots of used Trick Flow, Edelbrock and Ford GT-40 heads on the used market.
 
E

emagdnim

Active Member
Feb 5, 2003
391
15
28
Mar 9, 2021
#9
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #9
HemiRick said:
I recently installed a set of the Blueprint SBF heads and am very happy w them. I did buy bare heads and build them.
Click to expand...
Ive been looking at these as well. How do they perform?
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
Hillsborough county
Mar 9, 2021
#10
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #10
If money is not a concern...
Trick flow 11r
 
Reactions: TOOLOW91, Boostedpimp, RekeHavoc and 1 other person

HemiRick

I'd be looking at jacking under the house
Jun 28, 2020
723
272
73
Memphis TN
Mar 10, 2021
#11
  • Mar 10, 2021
  • #11
emagdnim said:
How do they perform?
Click to expand...
Quite well, there's a video on the web of a 306 w a E274 cam 1.6 rockers making 406 HP, I know my 19 lb inj. are currently too small and driving it conservatively until they get upgraded. But at half throttle, it def goes MUCH better than before with mildly ported E7's, I'm running a E264 cam w 1.7 rockers
 
Reactions: SSnakeGT127

SSnakeGT127

15 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
44
25
28
VA
Mar 10, 2021
#12
  • Mar 10, 2021
  • #12
Nice, I'm not exactly trying to set records or anything, but my motor in my car is an 86 5.0 with the crappy E6 heads with the lower tier comp cams, runs alright all things considered, but I feel anything would be a nice improvement over the E6s lol, just want to make it a nice stout 302 weekend toy.

From what I'm looking at it far as options/availability is.

AFR 165 - Available but low stock, seems to be the closest to restocking soon
Trickflow 170, - Not available, back order til April/May.
Promaxx 180 - build to order, should be sent out in a few weeks.
GT40 heads - definitely available, but not sure its worth the hassle/gain over the other options


I haven't really looked at the Blueprint heads, but something definitely to consider, what size are the intake valves? from my understanding once you get up to 2.02 valve size , that you tend to have issues with clearances, reason why I was leaning towards AFR or Trickflow.
 
Last edited: Mar 10, 2021

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,376
5,359
194
Corn County USA
Mar 10, 2021
#13
  • Mar 10, 2021
  • #13
I have an older set of Trick Flow 170s on my Cobra II, it sounds like our cars may be set up similarly. I also have a set of ProMaxx that I bought for my convertible project that I've yet to really do anything with, but the Trick Flows work well with the setup in my Cobra. I looked up and compared specs to the cam I'm running to the TF Stage 2 cam, my cam looks like it's a little bit smaller. If you're curious as to what your engine could put out with Trick Flows, a 650 Holley DP, dual plane, T5, and 3.55s, you can check out the dyno videos in the thread link in my sig. I don't think you'll go wrong with either set of heads though.
 
Reactions: SSnakeGT127 and General karthief
M

Monkeybutt2000

Mustang Master
Aug 11, 2019
1,387
849
133
Lafayette,IN
Mar 10, 2021
#14
  • Mar 10, 2021
  • #14
A stock bottom end 302 with AFR 165s will run HARD. If it's just a street car that's what I would go with. With the right cam will be a punchy street engine.
 
Reactions: SSnakeGT127

SSnakeGT127

15 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
44
25
28
VA
Mar 10, 2021
#15
  • Mar 10, 2021
  • #15
Monkeybutt2000 said:
A stock bottom end 302 with AFR 165s will run HARD. If it's just a street car that's what I would go with. With the right cam will be a punchy street engine.
Click to expand...
Yeah that’s were I’m leaning more towards, the AFR 165 I mean, it’s mainly going to be a weekend street toy to take out occasionally.

If I can get it close to 300whp mark or have the ingredients (motor/drivetrain wise) to click off a 12 second slip, I’ll be content with it.

side note, what do you guys recommend for 1.6 roller rockers & lifters, just wanted what your input would be?
 
M

Monkeybutt2000

Mustang Master
Aug 11, 2019
1,387
849
133
Lafayette,IN
Mar 10, 2021
#16
  • Mar 10, 2021
  • #16
SSnakeGT127 said:
Yeah that’s were I’m leaning more towards, the AFR 165 I mean, it’s mainly going to be a weekend street toy to take out occasionally.

If I can get it close to 300whp mark or have the ingredients (motor/drivetrain wise) to click off a 12 second slip, I’ll be content with it.

side note, what do you guys recommend for 1.6 roller rockers & lifters, just wanted what your input would be?
Click to expand...
With a sticky tire,a healthy 302 with HCI can run low 12's with ease. Assuming driver is capable. I went with the comp cam short travel lifters, and run 20yr old SVO 1.6s. I've seen failures of the cheap Ford replacement roller lifters,so I'd be wary of those.
 
Reactions: SSnakeGT127

SSnakeGT127

15 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
44
25
28
VA
Mar 10, 2021
#17
  • Mar 10, 2021
  • #17
Yeah that’s what I’ve been hearing lately, so I wasn’t sure on what to decide far as lifters go lol, budget wise I have a little wiggle room but nothing crazy, so just trying to pieces the right components so I can do it right the 1st time and not have to back track.

my new motor is already at the machine shop, so just gathering the most ideal parts for it as I go,

I also have a new never been use sets of valve guide retainer that off the Explorer motor, and was considering using those instead of the dog bone style sets.
 

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Mar 10, 2021
#18
  • Mar 10, 2021
  • #18
They all do what you want them to do it just comes down to part availability and your purse size. I've had a few cars with the TFS 170s and they ran great
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,027
1,618
194
NJ
Mar 10, 2021
#19
  • Mar 10, 2021
  • #19
Without a doubt i will say afr 165's are the best 302/306 head out there.
I've personally seen them make 359rwhp on a stock bottom end all motor.
Kinda hurts to say since i'm a big Twisted wedge fan, but it is what it is (and that's what i ran).
Drivability is also a function of the cam, you can go wild (which i have done with some negative affects) or mild and give up some top end for mid range.
Edit: 280rwhp is pretty easy, 320rwhp is going to take a little effort (and money).

There are a few more brands out there now, but it doesn't seem anyone ever offers up any definitive proof of how effective they really are. You can stuff boost through most heads, but it skews the numbers. Would love to see rear wheel dyno sheets from people with NA 302's with these other heads. It's almost impossible to compare them any other way.
 
Reactions: Monkeybutt2000

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Mar 10, 2021
#20
  • Mar 10, 2021
  • #20
Some may disagree but these are the best roller rockers I ever ran. The same set was installed in several engine combos over the years in a pedestal mount version. They never gave an issue in 20+ years. I sold them to a guy 7 or 8 years ago and he's still using them. Neither of us are using huge spring pressure rates. Just mild to slightly aggressive cams and proper set up.



I'm running comp cam stud mount 1.6 rockers but they are from when quality control mattered.
 
Reactions: revhead347
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Brand New Built 302 overheating
  • hassler
  • Sep 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
Rcdgl
R
R
New heads
  • Robman8028
  • Jul 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
782
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 31, 2025
gkomo
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
807
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?