Bluffing024
Active Member
Also I think whoever plays the Ravens next will be dealing with a pissed off team.
The Colts...

Also I think whoever plays the Ravens next will be dealing with a pissed off team.

Also I think whoever plays the Ravens next will be dealing with a pissed off team.
Im not saying this as a patriots fan, but that was a catch that Caldwell had, He was transferring the ball to one hand to the other, he had control and 2 feet in. Argue all you want it was called a TD on the field and up held through replay.
Great game Ravens gave them a run for their money but as always the patriots did what they had to do when they needed to do it.
They are 12-0 and that's all that matters.
Next week Pittsburgh becomes the next victim
Next week Pittsburgh becomes the next victim

The hold was a bad call...The refs gave them the game.![]()
Hopefully the Ravens wore them down for the Steelers next week![]()
I think the catch was iffy, however there was not irrefutable evidence to overturn it since it was called a catch on the field.
If it was called a no catch on the field I dont think there would have been enough to overturn that either.
That wasnt what cost the Ravens the game though, misplaced time out calls on the 4th an 1, crappy time managemant on the last drive with 40 seconds or so to go, and the INT thrown by Boller.
We will see...Pats are favored by 10 this week.
On another note, where you been? Haven't seen you around much in the last couple days.![]()
Or a really deflated one, the Ravens before the game said it was their Superbowl. My guess is it will be pretty hard to duplicate that defensive tenacity and I find it unlikely that Boller will have nearly as good a game against the Colts D which imo is significantly faster and overall better than the Pats D.
BTW back in black about your sig. Hate to break it to you, the 70s Steelers were some of the biggest steroid guys ever in the NFL. You may want to remove the
"5 rings no cheating" thing, just an fyi.
They were not illegal then.
Cute.
Your mouth getting sore from sucking all that dick?
They were not illegal then.
At least you admitted it.. I still think that touchdown catch was not reviewed properly... they were focused on the feet but what about the fact he didn't have control of the football? It defiantly wasn't a catch.
You are allowed to shift the ball into a better position after the catch.. It does not have to be tucked in before you go out BUT you do have to seem to have control of the ball.. This is a judgment call and on this type of call the ref is looking for panic moves to get the ball in control and on this play there was none that they could use to overturn it.
BTW the worst non call of the season was on that hail mary.. Samuel was tackled by Mason on that play.. That was the most blatant offensive pass interference I have seen in years and it was not called.
![]()
-2 points for un orginality
-10 points for un-originality for spewing the same "Patriots are masters of blah blah blah" crap that you say every week.