• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

The ultimate SN95 5.0 exhaust thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter ctrout71
  • Start date Start date Mar 29, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

ctrout71

Member
Feb 2, 2010
66
0
6
Mar 29, 2011
#1
  • Mar 29, 2011
  • #1
I have been having some difficulty in deciding what exhaust components to buy for my 95 GT. It seems that there may not be as many options for our cars. I was thinking that it may be nice if we had a master thread on all of the different exhaust combinations out there that will work with our cars. So what are you guys running, shorties with O/R X-pipe and Flowmaster 40s? Longtubes with catted H-pipe and Borlas? Please include as much info as possible, brand name, part numbers, stainless or aluminized, cats or not, etc. This way if someone (like me) is looking at a specific component, we can see what combinations it will work with. This thread would be completely awesome if everyone could also include a sound clip of your system (not one kind of like yours, but your actual car).

Please only 94-95 5.0s. No Fox's, no 4.6's. Thanks.

Ok, who's first?
 
9

94gt5.o

New Member
Dec 27, 2009
177
0
0
ferndale WA
Mar 29, 2011
#2
  • Mar 29, 2011
  • #2
I run bbk equal length headers,Mangna flow true x pipe stainless, then magna flow magna packs. The sound it amazing but if i did it over id go with long tubes and a shorty x but thats it. I will try and get a clip up soon. Just me saying this but stay away from flowmasters, WAY better exhaust systems out there.
P.S no cats O/R pipe
 
9

95_red_gt

Member
Mar 3, 2010
33
0
6
Redmond, OR
Mar 29, 2011
#3
  • Mar 29, 2011
  • #3
Right now I have a Mac O/R H-pipe and flowmaster catback with super 44 mufflers. Mac equal length shorty headers are back ordered, so hopefully they will ship soon. Sounds pretty good with what's on there right now.
 

GTA_V6_Mustang

Active Member
Nov 29, 2004
1,326
3
39
Miami, FL
Mar 29, 2011
#4
  • Mar 29, 2011
  • #4
In this clip I had Mac l/t's, Mac catted H, and Mac Catback.
CIMG6044.mp4 video by DMontanez88 - Photobucket
In this one I had Mac l/t's, VRS offroad x, and mac catback.
YouTube - 94 5.0 GT Dyno

Still havent gotten the clips with the magnapacks.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Mar 30, 2011
#5
  • Mar 30, 2011
  • #5
All of my exhaust setups have been put together...none were the bolt in type.

My experience with flowmaster is the aluminized version outlasted what seems to be a tank built spintech sportsman. And flowmaster offers stainless now...so unless you are a turbo application, flowmaster is a great option. They are the most popular for a reason!



What options do we not have as 94-95's? I can't think of anything 96-98s or foxes have that we don't.
 

ctrout71

Member
Feb 2, 2010
66
0
6
Mar 30, 2011
#6
  • Mar 30, 2011
  • #6
I don't know about the other model years but the biggest void that I see is a lack of stainless steel longtubes. a catted Prochamber would be nice too. I think my ideal system would be stainless BBK longtubes, smog legal (if there was such a thing), catted Prochamber midpipe (if they made one), and stainless Mac, Borla, or Flowmaster cat-back. Either that or a 50 state legal full Bassani system with longtubes, X-pipe, and cat-back, all in stainless.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Mar 30, 2011
#7
  • Mar 30, 2011
  • #7
My point that was coming was that if it fits a fox...it can fit our car.

But really, stainless = $ = quality which does not equate to bbk in my book.

If you go custom, then you get anything you want. Your entire list is checked off. Sure it ain't cheap, but your wants demand the cost.


The biggest exhaust hurdle will be transmission/bellhousing. Accufab accounts for both fox and our style clutch fork locations.

Then on catback's it's mainly hanger location.



Keeping it strictly 94-95 limits you in a way that holds you back IMO. How many of our cars are strictly 94-95 factory spec? You'll run into more headaches of headers fitting "special port" exhaust port heads then the same heads on a fOx and 94-95. If that makes sense.


There are 10fold more foxes out there...that knowledge will dwarf ours. Then...say how can it fit our car.
 

divit250r

Member
Mar 31, 2005
314
0
16
Columbia City, IN
Mar 30, 2011
#8
  • Mar 30, 2011
  • #8
I've got Mac 1-3/4 long tubes, cheapie ebay short x-pipe, and stainless Magnaflows / catback that was originally on an earlier Fox (maybe 85-86). Other than having to make two hanger rods for the tip/tailpipe ends it slid right in. The hangers I made were just scrap stainless rod bent like a straightened out Z. Like was mentioned, if it fit other Fox or SN chassis, it will most likely work out with a little effort. Everything but a catback for an irs car, of course.

Scott
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Mar 30, 2011
#9
  • Mar 30, 2011
  • #9
I've even seen a guy put a IRS catback on a solid axle rear...looks goofy. But fits!
 

cjrpony

Member
Jan 23, 2010
439
0
17
West Michigan
Apr 3, 2011
#10
  • Apr 3, 2011
  • #10
I have MAC LT headers and short H-pipe with Flowmaster Force II cat-back. It is all SN-95 spec stuff but I ended up putting a 1/4 inch shim on the passenger side motor mount to tilt the engine slightly. The headers were on the K member on the passenger side and hitting the driver side floor board. The extra tilt got me a little clearance on each. My engine always sat a little funny in the car so I don't know if that is neccessarily the fault of the exhaust components.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Apr 3, 2011
#11
  • Apr 3, 2011
  • #11
Flow-tech unequal shorties, BBK catted X, and Flow Master American Thunder catback. I want to get a set of BBK headers or at least get my Flow techs coated. The headers and catback are from 1999 when I bought the car...holding up well at 12yrs old but I do need to think about replacing them.
 

ctrout71

Member
Feb 2, 2010
66
0
6
Apr 3, 2011
#12
  • Apr 3, 2011
  • #12
blksn955.o,

Do you happen to have a sound clip of your car? Your set-up is very close to what I am considering and I'd like to hear it if I could.
 

Stangstroke

Member
Mar 25, 2011
118
0
16
Barrie Onatrio Canada
Apr 3, 2011
#13
  • Apr 3, 2011
  • #13
I've got a set of BBK long tube with the BBK X-Pipe with high flow cats into a set of Magnaflow mufflers and used the stock tail pipes sounds great has a great sound when you get all over it but doesn't anoy the hell out of you for day to day driving.
 

ctrout71

Member
Feb 2, 2010
66
0
6
Apr 3, 2011
#14
  • Apr 3, 2011
  • #14
Stangstroke,

Are those longtubes emissions legal?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 3, 2011
#15
  • Apr 3, 2011
  • #15
I run Mac 1 5/8 LT's, Mac catted mid pipe, & OEM catback

The headers/mid pipe are 94-95 specific and fit like a glove

I won't get into sound as that is subjective
but
I will address performance for NA applications

Shorties won't give low/mid range torque like LT's

Shorties don't have a true collector
which is needed for the e pulse of one hole to be scavenged or pulled by another

Grady
 

Stangstroke

Member
Mar 25, 2011
118
0
16
Barrie Onatrio Canada
Apr 4, 2011
#16
  • Apr 4, 2011
  • #16
ctrout71 said:
Stangstroke,

Are those longtubes emissions legal?
Click to expand...

I guess it depends where you are? The Long tubes passed emissions no problem in Ontario Canada emissions are pretty tough there as well maybe not in California. I don't think longtubes and short tubes are going to make a ton of difference it's going to be in the tune of your motor that will make the diference.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Apr 4, 2011
#17
  • Apr 4, 2011
  • #17
ctrout71 said:
blksn955.o,

Do you happen to have a sound clip of your car? Your set-up is very close to what I am considering and I'd like to hear it if I could.
Click to expand...

I can get one but it will be at least a week. Its been sitting in the garage since Oct/Nov. I want to change the oil and get it inspected (plates expired when I put it up for the winter) but can take a quick sound clip when I start it up.
 

chaos254

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
467
3
29
NJ
Apr 5, 2011
#18
  • Apr 5, 2011
  • #18
Long tubes are not legal in ca. I run bbk unequal headers, magnaflow catted xpipe and magnaflow catback. Im in ca and had no issues wih this setup passing smog in ca.
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Apr 6, 2011
#19
  • Apr 6, 2011
  • #19
If there is one thing that our cars don't have many options for it certainly is NOT exhaust.

Another thing to consider is that most people seem to change their exhaust at least once maybe even two or three times. So don't go blow 800 bucks on a exhaust system for a 1995 Mustang. Been there done that.

Current setup: Turbo and a Dynomax bullet.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 7, 2011
#20
  • Apr 7, 2011
  • #20
When talking NA

LT's can make a difference

The difference can be felt in the seat of the pants when driving

When you compare dyno charts between the two types of headers
you can see the low/mid range torque of those combos with LT's
almost always betters the shorties

It is not uncommon the see gains from 15 to 30 ft lbs

Again ... we are talking low to mid range
As you get to the top third of the curve the gain starts to diminish

Grady
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
1982 Mustang GL 5.0 single to dual exhaust conversion
  • Guyton
  • Jun 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
719
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 1, 2025
limp
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 5 6 7
Replies
122
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2026
DadLife0724
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
805
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?