• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

think 300 rwhp n/a is possible??

  • Thread starter Thread starter noslow5_0
  • Start date Start date Oct 30, 2004
N

noslow5_0

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
422
0
0
dallas tx.
Oct 30, 2004
#1
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #1
ok... lastnight i ran my best in the 1/8th with my current setup. before the underdrives an fan the combo put down 260hp/ 295 ft. lb. an my best run was an 8.8 with a suspension problem from hell... Fixed the suspension an ran a 8.43 last night. So the question is if i get my heads and intake ported along with say a tfs stage 1 cam think i could break 300 rwhp?? Shooting for a 7.99 n/a!!!
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Oct 30, 2004
#2
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #2
you could hit close to 300 na to the wheels with ported stock parts.
 
N

noslow5_0

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
422
0
0
dallas tx.
Oct 30, 2004
#3
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #3
well the shortblock has been balanced an blue printed then reassembled with all arp bolts with all forged internals so its gonna be boosted by next march hopefully... hoping to put down around 420 at the wheels with a sc trim???
 

Jkstang78

Founding Member
Oct 14, 2002
1,510
1
38
long island N.Y.
Oct 30, 2004
#4
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #4
Yea it should be no problem. there are a lot of guys on here with 300 N.A. I am 25 hp away with my combo. I dynoed it but never had a fuel/air done with it so. I don't know how rich or lean it is. Car made 277rwhp/313.tor

I just change to an 80 mm mass air meter and the car feels to run better with it over the C&l. But the 277/313 was made with this combo all parts not ported.

stock short block,edelbrock heads 1.90 valves,b-303cam,1.7 rockers,cobra intake,65mm t.b.,C&L 73 mass air meter,24Lb injectors,Paxton fuel presseruse regulator,17*of timming,K&N cone filter,1 & 5/8 Mac long tubes,prochamber H-pipe,& Mac dumps,pulleys,msd6al,master blaster coil,Ist air adjuster.
 
S

stang2841

New Member
Jun 12, 2004
708
0
0
palm harbor florida
Oct 30, 2004
#5
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #5
300RWHP N/A is a cake


Hell theres ppl pulling 330 RWHP N/A with stock driveability


AFR185's, holley systemax, custom cam, supporting mods your well over 300RWHP

go all trickflow Components (including cam) box stock everything with a TFS stage 2 cam and you got 300 or more at the wheels

its not a rare accomplishment
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Oct 30, 2004
#6
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #6
I don't know about you guys...but I really had to work for 300RWHP...it's not as easy as one thinks when going with a small setup...sure you can get a huge intake and big heads but if you are limited to resources and $$$ it's harder than it seems...With stock ported heads...you will not get 300RWHP...If you pick up 20RWHP with those heads that's about it...The TFS 1 cam will not pick up tons of HP over the E-cam...maybe 5RWHP if that...You have to get the E7's flowing...if you want to acheive max numbers you would need to change the valves and possibly get a valve job...
 
N

noslow5_0

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
422
0
0
dallas tx.
Nov 1, 2004
#7
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #7
there not stock heads... there world products windsor jr's.... and although aluminum heads would be nice, im 17 an pay for every damn thing including my car... so i was just going to have my heads ported with a 3 angle valve job an my intake ported as well... like i said above the combo made 260 at the wheels before pullies an electric fan... i shaved over .45 seconds off my fastest 1/8th mile pass along with a few suspension items so i know the car is close to 275 at the wheels now...
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Nov 1, 2004
#8
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #8
I made 272 @ the wheels on unported E7s (larger valves), stock cam, and an unported Cobra intake, with the rest of the bolt ons. I also did this with all the accessories hooked up, after driving 30 mins to the dyno! Id be more worried about track times, all the power out there does nothing when the tires are spinning!!!
 
C

CaliNotch n MI

New Member
Oct 31, 2004
8
0
0
Ann Arbor, MI
Nov 1, 2004
#9
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #9
I got 290 HP at the wheels, check out my set-up. So I would say 300 is possible.
 
R

raph130

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
517
0
0
Nov 4, 2004
#10
  • Nov 4, 2004
  • #10
*
 

PhLoBuS

New Member
Aug 15, 2004
473
0
0
Beverly, MA
Nov 4, 2004
#11
  • Nov 4, 2004
  • #11
300 is easy
 
R

Rock777

Member
Aug 22, 2004
195
1
16
Troy, IL
Nov 4, 2004
#12
  • Nov 4, 2004
  • #12
CaliNotch n MI, what does your exhaust consist of?
 
S

stangin it

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
554
0
0
Long Island, NY
Nov 4, 2004
#13
  • Nov 4, 2004
  • #13
Raise your compression and you will make 300rwhp+ with a good H/C/I combo on a 306. Dont let anyone tell you that you will need an expensive custom cam or a certain set of heads to accomplish your goal. My car made 323rwhp/346rwtq with a 306 10:5:1 edelbrock heads 1.90/1.60 with minor bowl work, comp cam xe270 and a TFS street heat intake. Its all about what parts work well together and of course tuning.
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Nov 4, 2004
#14
  • Nov 4, 2004
  • #14
the XE270 and the street heat are quite a bit better than an e-cam and a gt40 setup.

Windsor Jr's have 58cc chambers. Raising the CR wouldn't take much. A cam change alone would probably put you near or over 300. I made 280 with my old setup and that was with the stock TB.
 
N

Notched

New Member
Apr 1, 2004
113
0
0
Nov 4, 2004
#15
  • Nov 4, 2004
  • #15
well i should probably shut up, but i have stock 302 heads with oversized valves, 5 angle valve job, stud mount 1.6 proform roller rockers, all new seals, comp cam dual valve springs (rated for an F-cam-not sure lift)

if those are better then waht you have, and wanna buy them, i'll have no problem selling them to you for dirt cheap..
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Nov 4, 2004
#16
  • Nov 4, 2004
  • #16
Notched said:
well i should probably shut up, but i have stock 302 heads with oversized valves, 5 angle valve job, stud mount 1.6 proform roller rockers, all new seals, comp cam dual valve springs (rated for an F-cam-not sure lift)

if those are better then waht you have, and wanna buy them, i'll have no problem selling them to you for dirt cheap..
Click to expand...



Yeah, you should shutup...J/K dude IMO the Windsor Jr's are a lot better than any stock head could ever hope to be. Even with the bigger valves, the runner volume is still to constricting. Plus the Jr's have a much smaller combustion chamber. Kind of you to offer though.
 
N

Notched

New Member
Apr 1, 2004
113
0
0
Nov 4, 2004
#17
  • Nov 4, 2004
  • #17
k.. then i stand corrected, and shutting up right now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Y
400HP 2V N/A....Going back to my roots....
  • Yel2002GTAuto
  • Sep 26, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 6 7 8
Replies
159
Views
28K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2025
Bullitt347
F
1993 Cobra flooding
  • FireFoxCobra_SVT93
  • May 20, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2023
nickyb
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?