• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Thoughts on the new CPP front suspension?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bnickel
  • Start date Start date Sep 12, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
First Prev 9 of 9

mach1one

Boulevard Bruiser
Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
4,775
0
0
Living in the past
Oct 21, 2009
#161
  • Oct 21, 2009
  • #161
This might be a dumb question but what about us 71-73 guys? This kit shows working only to a 70. I want this Time to redo my front suspension
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Oct 21, 2009
#162
  • Oct 21, 2009
  • #162
I don't think they have prototyped a 71-73 yet.
 

mach1one

Boulevard Bruiser
Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
4,775
0
0
Living in the past
Oct 21, 2009
#163
  • Oct 21, 2009
  • #163
Ugh, no love for the 71-73 when it comes to suspension stuff is what I'm finding out. TCP is all I've had luck with a good coilover type setup with.
 

68 high in fiber

New Member
May 20, 2012
2
0
1
May 20, 2012
#164
  • May 20, 2012
  • #164
bnickel said:
what can you tell us abouy the geometry changes and how they affect the drivability of the car? stuff like caster gain/loss, camber gain/loss, bumpsteer, etc.


also, the ad you guys have says you have options like drop spindles, brake kits, etc. do you have those available yet or they also a future offering? if they are available do you have any pics you can post?

do you have any pics of the mustang kit installed also?
Click to expand...
First time on any site. not keyboard savey so bare with me. I just put in the cpp front set up in my 68 coupe. Beating on the car since a week ago and i have to say- i likey! Car has a one inch coil drop along with a Shelby drop. Running a 18 x8 rim 26" tall tire manual disc break. Car was no problem to align. Rear is still leaf set up with a sway bar and a shortened 8.8 18x9.5 rim and a 295 tire. Also disc. Car handles like a go cart and is point and shoot without surprises. Big bang for buck.
 

Fstbk

Member
Sep 7, 2010
215
2
19
May 20, 2012
#165
  • May 20, 2012
  • #165
If you have some install pics please make a thread, I would love to see it. If I build another car I am going to go that route!
 

68 high in fiber

New Member
May 20, 2012
2
0
1
May 20, 2012
#166
  • May 20, 2012
  • #166
bnickel said:
the problem is that it's so new no one has really tried it yet. the nova forums may not be a bad idea actuall.

it does appear to have a lot of bang for the buck
Click to expand...
as long as your lower rad support is solid and your frame rail outer lips are also solid, you can go to town with this setup. the steel plate acts like an export brace from the shock tower and forward, where the car can use a lot less twisting and flexing. follow the toque spec in the instructions and the units fit will impress you. my father has an all orig setup in his 68 ragtop and as a mustang lover i hate to say it drives like an old wheel barrel. my 68 coupe, for the price and the ease of install of the cpp suspension, handles like a race car.
 

horseballz

10 Year Member
Sep 30, 2009
824
19
49
Las Vegas, NV
May 21, 2012
#167
  • May 21, 2012
  • #167
The few folks that have tried this setup ALL absolutely love it. A while back, a member posted a link to pics of his install and it looked great. The naysayers seem to be folks who haven't used or installed the stuff and complain that it was made for chebbies, don't like the cocking of the bushings for alignment, etc. Well, the stock bushings on the stock lower control arms sure get cocked as you adjust the strut rods. When I can afford it, this setup WILL be on my 68!
Gene
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
May 21, 2012
#168
  • May 21, 2012
  • #168
Any complaint that this was originally made for a Chevy is kinda dumb. It was made for the old Novas which used the EXACT same type of lower control arm suspension setup as our Mustangs. This kit turns the front end into a true SLA suspension which, as far as I know, is proven to be the best method you can use.
 

NMEMJCM

Member
Nov 10, 2009
83
2
6
Long Beach CA
May 23, 2012
#169
  • May 23, 2012
  • #169
I have this kit on my ride, only issue is the ball joint that comes with the lower control arm is from a Mopar. It is a good ball joint, just a hare small so the stock mustang spindle sits alittle low on it, crushing the ball joint dust boot causing it to spew grease. I notified the engineers at CPP of this issue and I believe they are now supplying small cone type bushings that you slide into your spindle before slipping it on the ball joint. This scoots the whole assembly up off the dust boot on the ball jount. I machined custom ones for my car years ago to fix the problem. No biggy, just make sure you get the spacers. I will say that the car tracks great with this kit. I would use it again.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
May 23, 2012
#170
  • May 23, 2012
  • #170
I believe it is a Mustang 2 screw in ball joint.
 

NMEMJCM

Member
Nov 10, 2009
83
2
6
Long Beach CA
May 25, 2012
#171
  • May 25, 2012
  • #171
Yes, it is a screw in ball joint... but it is from a Mopar (
McCoy Norris number is FA395
Moog number is K772.
I bought two spares from a local auto parts store when I was dealing with the crushed dust boot problem.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
May 25, 2012
#172
  • May 25, 2012
  • #172
K772 is also the part number for the Mustang 2 screw in ball joint. Looks like we are both right =)
 

bikefreak600

Member
Dec 10, 2005
156
2
19
rochelle IL
May 26, 2012
#173
  • May 26, 2012
  • #173
Rusty67 said:
K772 is also the part number for the Mustang 2 screw in ball joint. Looks like we are both right =)
Click to expand...
lol ! i am designing my own suspension, but i also really like this setup too. i think this kit modified to use coilover on the lower arm would be a nice setup ! pretty cheap too
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
May 27, 2012
#174
  • May 27, 2012
  • #174
They actually have a coil over setup for the Nova. They use the stock upper spring mount and put a lower coil perch on the shock and bolt it to the upper arm. I really like the way they did it. Seems to be the way to go. I might do that later but I already have roller perches so I'm kinda set for the most part. I don't know if they actually sell that however.
 
T

theimmortal

New Member
Aug 6, 2012
1
0
1
Aug 6, 2012
#175
  • Aug 6, 2012
  • #175
I'm about to replace my front end suspension and have been seriously looking at this kit, and after reading this thread I'm pretty much sold. My understanding is they now have a bolt-in coil-over kit for this that is only $599, which is a few hundred less than any of the others I have seen (Ron Morris, TCP, Global West, etc.). I'm curious as to how well this works with the Shelby drop for the UCA. Has anybody done this? Would I just use the same negative wedge kit for the stock upper ball joint or does this use a different style?
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Aug 6, 2012
#176
  • Aug 6, 2012
  • #176
Call them and ask for Danny. He should be able to answer that.
 

66 Racer

Founding Member
Aug 9, 2001
130
0
16
so cal
Sep 28, 2012
#177
  • Sep 28, 2012
  • #177
Hi guys,

I remember this kit when it first was made and then it seems to have disappeared a while and now is showing up again. How has the long term use with this front suspension turned out, seems like a lot of the posts regarding this kit are old and on initial install people love it but any long term issues? I saw the lower ball joint issue and will be sure to mention it to them when purchasing the kit to make sure Im set up right.

My 66 coupe is mostly street driven but my front end rebuild is about 6yrs old now and am looking for an upgrade. Is this kit the answer for occasional open track events? Canyon carving against modern imports (sti/evo cars)? Doesnt need to handle like an actual race car but realistically hope it can keep up with the modern technology these new sports cars have. Doesnt hurt the 66 is 2700lbs either lol

Thanks, Looking to save and avoid the $1500 kits out by other brands.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Sep 30, 2012
#178
  • Sep 30, 2012
  • #178
My 67 is currently down for the count due to non-suspension related issues. I did check the front suspension on it about 2 months ago and the bushings they use in the arms are holding up perfectly even with the car sitting there doing nothing like it shouldn't be. The one area I saw that was bad was the balljoint boots. The boots have deteriorated and one of them fell appart. Really, they should have used the poly boots for longevity. The last time I had the car out, the thing handled FANTASTIC. My only other sugestion besides getting the proper spindle adaptor for the balljoint would be to buy poly balljoint boots and put those on prior to assembly. Other then that, the kit is killer and the best value for your dollar if you aren't going to do vintage legal racing.
 

66 Racer

Founding Member
Aug 9, 2001
130
0
16
so cal
Oct 2, 2012
#179
  • Oct 2, 2012
  • #179
Rusty67 said:
My 67 is currently down for the count due to non-suspension related issues. I did check the front suspension on it about 2 months ago and the bushings they use in the arms are holding up perfectly even with the car sitting there doing nothing like it shouldn't be. The one area I saw that was bad was the balljoint boots. The boots have deteriorated and one of them fell appart. Really, they should have used the poly boots for longevity. The last time I had the car out, the thing handled FANTASTIC. My only other sugestion besides getting the proper spindle adaptor for the balljoint would be to buy poly balljoint boots and put those on prior to assembly. Other then that, the kit is killer and the best value for your dollar if you aren't going to do vintage legal racing.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the reply. I think this may be the ticket for me. I might try the lower kit they have and go for a different upper later on even to save some cash up front, trying to save for a house and upgrade the stang at the same time is a challenge haha
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
First Prev 9 of 9
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

5
Foxbody Intro
  • 5.0Sucio
  • May 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
67
The Welcome Wagon May 26, 2026
Noobz347
Sn95 new style hub retaining nuts
  • limp
  • Mar 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
488
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 7, 2025
limp
N
New Member - Northlands, New Zealand
  • NZ66
  • Jan 25, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
228
The Welcome Wagon Jan 26, 2025
Neko-
M
New from North Texas
  • MFReeves
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
9
Views
492
The Welcome Wagon Sep 22, 2025
nickyb
For Sale Maximum Motorsports MMTR-2 Bumpsteer Kit - 1979 - 1993 Mustang
  • AeroCoupe
  • Apr 18, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
530
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 18, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?