• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Throttle body/mass air size questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91ghp5.0
  • Start date Start date Nov 6, 2005

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
Nov 6, 2005
#1
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #1
So i've got a few bucks to spend, and I'm ordering a larger MAS, TB, and a BBK fenderwell-mount CAI. im gonna do a 70 mm TB (i think?? is this too big for a stock intake? ill probably go aftermarket sometime)...accufab, and a granatelli (any other suggestions??) 75mm MAS w/ cold air tuning (is this necessary?) tuned for 19 lb stock injectors. are the sizes correct for a bolt-on w/ B cam and longtube engine? thanks in advance.
-Dan
 
1

1SLO306

My 97 GTP owns you ALL!
Mar 31, 2005
904
1
17
Muhlenberg, ky
Nov 6, 2005
#2
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #2
i would say save some more money and get some heads first or u wont see hardly and change. i have an intake sittin here if u want it.Its a TFS street heat intake(upper/lower)250 plus shippin. Its is just takin up space right now.
 

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
Nov 6, 2005
#3
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #3
not a big fan of the systemax/TF intake look, but ill keep ya in mind though. thanks! (miles on the upper/lower??)
 

mrswivlepants

New Member
Aug 13, 2003
93
0
0
Nov 6, 2005
#4
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #4
I had a 70mm on with a Cobra intake, with stock heads and a 73mm MAF. Switched back to the 55mm and it seems more peppy. I plan on doing heads soon so the 70mm will go back on then. It might still be too much for my application.
 

mbsprinks281

Member
Apr 19, 2005
58
2
9
Lockport, IL
Nov 6, 2005
#5
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #5
Use the money elsewhere until you can afford heads. If you are buying the BBK fenderwell tube for performance, save your money. There are some cheaper options out there that are more HP effective.
 

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
Nov 6, 2005
#6
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #6
such as? i've got some dough to spend, and i wanna do something. i've heard that doing these things creates the opportunity for lost power, and i dont want that. i dont have enough for heads (unfortunately..working on it though), so i'd like to spend some money elsewhere.
-D
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Nov 6, 2005
#7
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #7
Your best bet with modifications is to have a long-term goal. People start picking pieces, then changing directions down the road, then end up with useless parts. Basically I would pick your horsepower goal first, then the mods you will be taking to get there. Also consider how you want it to drive on the street or if it is going to be a trailor track queen. Also, it is important to know operating RPM range.

For the MAF, I would choose that later. Due to the fact that you need to pick an appropriate fuel injector size for your ultimate goal, no need in getting the wrong calibration when it comes time to order it. A 65mm is about as big as you want to go for stock induction components. If you ever start hitting towards the 350 hp level a 70mm would be an excellent choice. Obviously though, the bigger things are, then the extra power must also be present to work correctly. Accufab is a very high quality piece, I wouldn't both with a Granatelli piece. As sad as it is, GMS products are hardly their own. they contract out to other companies to make their stuff then they just re-sell them off as their own for a very jacked-up price.
 

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
Nov 6, 2005
#8
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #8
Is C&L a good replacement then? This is my daily driver, and will be for the next 4 or 5 years (college). I'd like to have an HCI setup thats fun on the street, can take it to the strip, etc. (what everyone in the world wants). probably AFR 165's are next (if not the induction components), then an Cobra intake. The new 306 has a B cam, larger pistons to accomadate the larger bore (not 100% sure on the brand, couldnt find the receipt). eventually i'd like to do a stroker, but thats way off. back to thep oint. i'd like to shoot for just over 300 at the crank, just below or close to 300 at the wheels. is this an achievable goal with AFR's/Cobra intake/B cam? thanks for the help guys!
-Dan

on another completely different note. I like going in a straight line fast, but I'm starting to like the twisties more and more. what are basic components i can add to make the corners more fun?
 
1

1SLO306

My 97 GTP owns you ALL!
Mar 31, 2005
904
1
17
Muhlenberg, ky
Nov 6, 2005
#9
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #9
91ghp5.0 said:
not a big fan of the systemax/TF intake look, but ill keep ya in mind though. thanks! (miles on the upper/lower??)
Click to expand...
i really dont know how many mile. the guy that had the car before me put it on when he rebuilt it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Z
Engine New head for ‘88 mass air converted foxbody
  • zahirayunus
  • Dec 13, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
211
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2024
zahirayunus
Z
8
Fox Mass Air Flow 42lb injectors
  • 89wreck
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
810
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
Scrapla347
I
Engine What Camshaft?
  • Iceman1998
  • Oct 5, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
564
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2024
Noobz347
Fox 329 HP low for a stroker?
  • Andresquintana.mma
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 19, 2025
Jarhead67
J
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?