• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Throttle Body Size help

  • Thread starter Thread starter 68efisuper
  • Start date Start date May 10, 2006
6

68efisuper

New Member
Nov 29, 2005
32
0
0
May 10, 2006
#1
  • May 10, 2006
  • #1
I have a 92 5.0 motor with a Kenne Bell 1.5l blower. The motor has afr 165 heads a healthy cam,headers, roller rockers, C@l Maf. Trying to upgrade the throtte body, but not sure which size, any help would be appreciated. Thanks
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
May 10, 2006
#2
  • May 10, 2006
  • #2
The port on the Kenne Bell accepts as large as a 70 mm unit, so go 70.
 
D

Deleted member 87397

May 10, 2006
#3
  • May 10, 2006
  • #3
+1
 

Hi-Po

Member
Mar 31, 2005
106
0
16
Oslo, Norway
May 10, 2006
#4
  • May 10, 2006
  • #4
I have a '92 LX with a KB 1.5 L as well, however my engine is all stock except for the blower and a CAI. I asked Kenne Bell what TB they would recommend for my current setup and they replied Accufab 75 mm. According to KB the blower intake will accept a 75 mm TB without any porting. In my opinion this sounds too large, but then again I guess they would not recommend something that would affect performance/drivability in a negative way. Eventually I will upgrade my engine with further mods, but I have decided (more or less) that time being I am going to go with an Edelbrock TB 70 mm...
 
W

WLDHRSE

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2001
701
1
19
Elkton, MD
May 10, 2006
#5
  • May 10, 2006
  • #5
I would go 75 mm Accufab. 70 mm seems a little small for heads and blower.

Cliff
 
J

jaybquick

New Member
Dec 4, 2004
27
0
0
May 11, 2006
#6
  • May 11, 2006
  • #6
70mm is too small. I have a 75mm on my 347 and it makes plenty of torque and it is a low CR NA motor.
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
May 11, 2006
#7
  • May 11, 2006
  • #7
Forced induction is a different animal compared with N/A. With a smaller throttle body you are not asking and big-inch stroker to "suck" through a straw. Boost will force itself where it wants to go. If it would be most beneficial to put a 90mm TB on a blown 5.0, would I do it? No, simply because that would be for maximum performance at high rpm's, low speed drivability may not have very good manners. If you mostly do not go past 5000 rpm and mostly do a lot of cruising, the infamous 65mm that so many turbo gurus use may even be more beneficial. I would definitely cap it at 75 though and go no higher.
 
J

jaybquick

New Member
Dec 4, 2004
27
0
0
May 11, 2006
#8
  • May 11, 2006
  • #8
it is a kenne bell not a centrifugal or turbo, they make plenty of low end torque, 75 mm might cost him 5 ft lbs, maybe. Might as mell not cap it on the top end. My roots blower on my carbed car hated small carbs. Some concept since it is not blowing through the throttle body but sucking with the Kenne.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
May 11, 2006
#9
  • May 11, 2006
  • #9
jaybquick - So a big 5mm difference is what makes a throttle body "too small" and then 5mm later it is "just right"...lol.

87GTStang is right on...

70mm TB would be just fine...and your gas wouldn't be so touchy for stop and go traffic.

Stick with the 70mm TB. If you want every bit of high-end hp, get the 75mm TB.

The Kenne-Bell will help make up for whatever "torque" you may or may not lose...
 
J

jaybquick

New Member
Dec 4, 2004
27
0
0
May 12, 2006
#10
  • May 12, 2006
  • #10
5spd GT said:
jaybquick - So a big 5mm difference is what makes a throttle body "too small" and then 5mm later it is "just right"...lol.

87GTStang is right on...

70mm TB would be just fine...and your gas wouldn't be so touchy for stop and go traffic.

Stick with the 70mm TB. If you want every bit of high-end hp, get the 75mm TB.

The Kenne-Bell will help make up for whatever "torque" you may or may not lose...
Click to expand...

My whole point is that it can fit 75 mm for a reason. Just run it. Like you said and I said before the torque will come from the Kenne-Bell, so why not help out the top end some.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
725
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 30, 2026
keel
H
New Built 91 Foxbody electrical failure. Need help
  • hassler
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
504
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 21, 2025
limp
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
976
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
272
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
T
Resolved No run or idle
  • Thebluefox1
  • Oct 10, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
539
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
DadLife0724
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?