• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

To go 2.5" or 3" exhaust??

  • Thread starter Thread starter caseywan
  • Start date Start date Jan 30, 2007
C

caseywan

Member
Apr 7, 2006
157
0
17
Chicago, IL
Jan 30, 2007
#1
  • Jan 30, 2007
  • #1
I am doing a motor build this winter and am debating going 2.5" or 3" exhuast.

Motor will be Boss 302 block stroked to 336, very heavily ported TFS heads, heavily ported GT40 lower with Kenne Bell 2.2 Flowzilla pushing 10-12psi, and 3:73 gears.

I'm thinking I am going to have some serious low end torque and am tossing around going 3" exhaust to even it out a little bit.

What do you guys think?
 

rickd93_lx

New Member
Dec 22, 2005
162
0
0
Jan 30, 2007
#2
  • Jan 30, 2007
  • #2
for forced air induction, especially at 10 to 12 psi i would recomend a 3 inch exhaust to help clear out spent gasses and allow for a frsher mixture in the cc's.
i would also recomend 1 3/4 inch lt's. back pressure and superchargers do not combine well. more boost does not nessisarally more power the less resistance the super charger has the more power you will produce even @ a lower boost level.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 30, 2007
#3
  • Jan 30, 2007
  • #3
i believe 2.5 inch is supposed to be good to around 400 ponies before it starts hampering performance. I have no doubt that combo will exceed that number so go with the 3 inch.
 

f4fntm

New Member
Oct 10, 2004
88
2
0
Olympia, WA
Jan 31, 2007
#4
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #4
what they said ^
 

tom23

New Member
Dec 20, 2004
55
0
0
CT
Jan 31, 2007
#5
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #5
3 in. all the way
 

LB0193

Member
Dec 6, 2005
171
0
16
IL
Jan 31, 2007
#6
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #6
3inch no q asked
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jan 31, 2007
#7
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #7
3"..And fyi, just because you put a "bigger" exhaust on does NOT mean you "lose" low end torque.
 

5.0 Nostalgia

10 Year Member
Feb 28, 2003
904
5
39
CT
Jan 31, 2007
#8
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #8
3" without a doubt. If you don't want longtubes, Bassani makes a 1 3/4" short tube header for Anderson Ford .
 
C

caseywan

Member
Apr 7, 2006
157
0
17
Chicago, IL
Jan 31, 2007
#9
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #9
Ok, guess I will definatly be going longtube, thinking full Bassani with Longtubes and o/r x-pipe.

Thanks for everyones input.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
884
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
The Most Preferred Aluminum heads
  • SSnakeGT127
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 28, 2021
SSnakeGT127
Progress Thread finishing touches on my stroker build
  • doobismaximus
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 1, 2021
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?