• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

To inject, or not to inject.. that is the question...

  • Thread starter Thread starter TF Mondo
  • Start date Start date Aug 20, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
6

66fastback

Founding Member
Apr 13, 1999
220
0
0
Lewisville, TX.
Aug 22, 2008
#21
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #21
These cars came with highway gears.....unless you were "lucky" enough to have an original 4bbl car, you got 2.80 gears with all 2bbl 289's. Just a swap into the 3.25-3.55 range would make a world of difference. I currently have the 3.40 gears in mine, but will probably move up to the 3.80 range as I prefer a rather spirited driving experience. If accelleration isn't a major concern to you, then keep the 2.80's and spend your money elsewhere.

You are still slow to provide us with all the details, I'm thinking like Hearne.....you have too big a carb matched with stock gears and an auto trans.......sound right? A mostly stock 289 probably only needs a 450-500 cfm carb to be honest....they fall flat above 4000 rpm. Like he said, a 650 double pumper would be way too much on a stocker. Now with heads, cam......
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Aug 22, 2008
#22
  • Aug 22, 2008
  • #22
66fastback said:
"We had the pump and fuel lines routed well away from the exhaust systems, and the pumps mounted below the bottom of the tank level. We tried a number of different pump manufacturers and eventually just pulled the stock tanks and had fittings brazed into the tops to mount the in-tank pumps. Problem solved in both cases.
Click to expand...

Weird, what pumps did you try? I'm not in texas, but I've never experienced a problem. Have checked the pump and yes it got a little warm, but not very hot at all.

LOTS of OEM vehicles using inline pumps with no problems at all.

With a 255lph pump, it moves the fuel through the system so quickly, it shouldn't have a chance to get hot at all. At 255Lph, that's over a gallon a minute... I don't see how the pump could heat a gallon of fuel to the point of vaporization in under a minute.
 
6

66fastback

Founding Member
Apr 13, 1999
220
0
0
Lewisville, TX.
Aug 23, 2008
#23
  • Aug 23, 2008
  • #23
I don't remember the exact pumps we tried. I know we both had Holley pumps and enjoyed driving the cars for several months......then the weather got hot. By mid-summer both cars were having problems. I think we also tried an Accel pump, and one other.....not sure which brand now. We switched to the in-tank pumps and have had years of service without another problem.

I have a buddy who does efi conversions on Jeeps, and he never had a problem like this and all he uses are the in-line pumps. Maybe it has something to do with the air flow under the vehicle. I'm not saying that you WILL have problems with the in-line pumps, I'm just relating personal experience.
 

jcp123

New Member
Nov 1, 2003
408
0
0
Tyler, TX
Aug 28, 2008
#24
  • Aug 28, 2008
  • #24
Well I wouldn't bother, but not really for any reasons that are relevant to anybody other than myself I grew up in Silicon Valley, I just got burned out by electronics. I got into these cars specifically BECAUSE they didn't have all that stuff on em. In fact, when the warrantee is up on my Harley, I will be taking its EFI off and putting a carby on. But that extends to pretty much all parts of my life...I do my schoolwork on a typewriter, I don't have an Ipod or a cell phone, etc.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Aug 28, 2008
#25
  • Aug 28, 2008
  • #25
I don't necessarily mind EFI, however I just don't like the look of the 5.0 manifolds on classics TBO. Just looks out of place. I do however like those kits that use a throttle body in replacement of the carb.

Or something like this would look sweet too.
Katicore Motorsport - Ford 302/351 Cleveland Manifold
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel injection questions
  • limp
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
370
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 28, 2025
limp
Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
594
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
TB Injection Install (Aces Killshot)
  • LILCBRA
  • Feb 5, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 4 5 6
Replies
119
Views
21K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Dec 1, 2024
LILCBRA
R
Fuel Throttle body fuel injection
  • Robertstang
  • Aug 28, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 5, 2023
2000xp8
9
94 GT 351 Windsor Swap
  • 996stang
  • Feb 4, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2024
996stang
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?