• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Too Low Compression?????

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenPOS
  • Start date Start date Nov 4, 2014
G

GreenPOS

New Member
Nov 4, 2014
3
0
1
Nov 4, 2014
#1
  • Nov 4, 2014
  • #1
Hey guys, I'm currently putting together a 302 to boost later down the road after I mock everything up in another car. Its a stock block, .020 over with +8cc pistons, E-cam, I've done some bowl work and got the combustion chambers to 63cc, Trick flow heads worked over real good, and a cobra intake worked over real good too.... So according to a compression ratio calculator, I'm currently at 8.24:1, is this a decent low compression motor for boost? And would this motor make decent power without boost? Or is this motor gonna be a dog on the streets without boost? Also, what kinda boost pressure could I push it to with a lower compression motor like this? Sorry if it sounds like a noobie question, but I kinda am new to boost..... Thanks in advance guys.
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Nov 6, 2014
#2
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #2
IMO, it will be a dog N/A. It is definetly safe for boost, bit you could be another point of compressikn without issue. Most motors built that low for boost plan on some bigger amount of boost. How much do you want to run?

Joe
 
Reactions: GreenPOS

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Nov 6, 2014
#3
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #3
i agree that it will be quite sluggish on the low end, and through about 3000rpm. boost pressure would really help this engine. something on the order of 8-10psi starting to come on at about 1500 rpm would be great.
 
Reactions: GreenPOS
G

GreenPOS

New Member
Nov 4, 2014
3
0
1
Nov 6, 2014
#4
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #4
How much boost? As much as I can get away with lol... I'd like 15-20....
I could've swore I read somewhere stick compression is like 8.78ish... My numbers not much lower then that, plus all the flow added, it shouldn't be too bad right? Idk? I'm kinda learning as I go and trying to be different I guess!?!?
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Nov 6, 2014
#5
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #5
It's around 9:1. Lowering compression really just allows you to run a little more boost without detonation. Alot of guys run 12-15 pounds on motors in the 9-9.5:1 range. Remember that boost is really a measure of pressure in the intake manifold. A completely stock motor may make 15 lbs with a certain pulley setup, while a motor with better intake and heads will only make 10 lbs with the same pulley setup. These are only example numbers, but hopefully you get the idea. I would run the boost needed to safely make your HP goal.

Joe
 
Reactions: GreenPOS and 85rkyboby

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Nov 6, 2014
#6
  • Nov 6, 2014
  • #6
GreenPOS said:
How much boost? As much as I can get away with lol... I'd like 15-20....
I could've swore I read somewhere stick compression is like 8.78ish... My numbers not much lower then that, plus all the flow added, it shouldn't be too bad right? Idk? I'm kinda learning as I go and trying to be different I guess!?!?
Click to expand...


reading is fundamental.
rbohm said:
something on the order of 8-10psi starting to come on at about 1500 rpm would be great.
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: GreenPOS
G

GreenPOS

New Member
Nov 4, 2014
3
0
1
Nov 11, 2014
#7
  • Nov 11, 2014
  • #7
RangerJoe said:
It's around 9:1. Lowering compression really just allows you to run a little more boost without detonation. Alot of guys run 12-15 pounds on motors in the 9-9.5:1 range. Remember that boost is really a measure of pressure in the intake manifold. A completely stock motor may make 15 lbs with a certain pulley setup, while a motor with better intake and heads will only make 10 lbs with the same pulley setup. These are only example numbers, but hopefully you get the idea. I would run the boost needed to safely make your HP goal.

Joe
Click to expand...

Your right, thanks for the advice. I'm just talking crazy and having big hopes and dreams lol.... I realize 10lbs is a safe realistic number. I also realize with lower compression I can run more timimg, but im alittle unfamiliar with the benefits of more timing too. I actually refigured my number and forgot to add in my overbore of .020 so im actually at 8.5ish on the CR.... Ive also researched around and found diffent views on where the mass air should be when I do boost it, how do yall feel about before or after the turbo mass air postion?
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Nov 11, 2014
#8
  • Nov 11, 2014
  • #8
@ 8.5 compression you will be ok. N/A you may notice a loss in low end torque but under boost you will be fine and have a safe staring point. Timing affects the overall hp out put of a motor. This only holds true until you reach the threshold of detonation. Fuel choice will largely play a role here too.
FWIW we are at 9.5:1 compression and see 30psi of boost and have zero issues while keeping the timing is conservative (in my instance) around 24 degrees. This truly is a case by case basis and every single detail of your combo needs to be spelled out to help you any farther
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Nov 11, 2014
#9
  • Nov 11, 2014
  • #9
remember installing aluminum heads generally lowers compression over stock e7's, which is why most guys mill the heads to raise it back up. If you are running a blower or turbo, the lower compression will just make it a little safer. If N/A or nitrous, it is going to be a dog down low.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Engine No start issue AGAIN!
  • ucnhtmenow1
  • Sep 1, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
891
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 11, 2024
89ripper
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
424
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?