• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Tribotex initial review

  • Thread starter Thread starter Inneh
  • Start date Start date Mar 27, 2021
I

Inneh

Member
Aug 4, 2020
24
4
13
Seattle, WA
Mar 27, 2021
#1
  • Mar 27, 2021
  • #1
So I had to give this stuff a try after I saw it featured on Nasa's site. Nano particulate oil additive that has microscopic wafers with one "sticky" side and one smooth side. Over the course of an oil change, the pieces slowly bond to imperfections inside the engine, claiming to fill scratches, gaps, deterioration... And improve fuel mileage, compression, horsepower, stop some leaks, and send lubrication efficiency through the roof, similar to a Teflon coating.

They say allow 500 miles to see results. I am at 200 so far, and the car is noticeably more eager to respond to the throttle. It literally feels and sounds like an engine half its age. Some chug a lugging that's normal at 200k miles seems to have backed off, the car sounds and feels throatier, and as far as acceleration/throttle response, it now drives with a 250lb passenger the way it felt when I was driving alone.

I am initially impressed. 100 bucks for a treatment that they recommend to repeat after 40 or 50k miles later. I have fuel mileage numbers from about a month ago that I can compare to later on, and I also have an approximate 0-60, although I wish I had done a 30-60 in 3rd beforehand, since that's what I'm going to be using to gage any future mods.

I would recommend for high mileage cars.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Mar 28, 2021
#2
  • Mar 28, 2021
  • #2
If it helped, I doubt it helped like by that method. Those sound like magic molecules. Tribotex is the actual brand? Nano particulate oil additive gets many Google hits, and most are for “mini ball bearing” friction reducers.

How Slick 50’s PTFE particles adhered to the metal was never proven. I rang up a lot of it, but wondered about what good it really did.
 
Last edited: Mar 28, 2021

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Mar 28, 2021
#3
  • Mar 28, 2021
  • #3
I see on the MSDS that they do not put much of the proprietary one side sticky sheets material in per dose. It must be powerful stuff.
https://www.tribotex.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/TriboTEX_Lubricating_treatments_MSDS_12-6-2020.pdf
 

nickyb

I gotta say i never painted my nuts, Never Ever
15 Year Member
Apr 3, 2009
2,972
1,618
153
nevada
Mar 28, 2021
#4
  • Mar 28, 2021
  • #4
I've never had faith in a mechanic in a can, so do the testing and keep us posted. I still daily mine and miles are getting up there.
 
Reactions: Dubsport and 7991LXnSHO
D

Deleted member 38176

Mar 29, 2021
#5
  • Mar 29, 2021
  • #5
Nanoparticles? NASA allows advertising just as any other website does. Just because you see it on a "NASA site" does not mean that it must by a miracle of science. Sounds like complete BS
 
Reactions: Dubsport
I

Inneh

Member
Aug 4, 2020
24
4
13
Seattle, WA
Mar 30, 2021
#6
  • Mar 30, 2021
  • #6
Update at 430 miles since application:
Gas mileage on the last tank jumped from 21.7 to 24.1.
Partial throttle response is greatly improved since the beginning. I doubt wot acceleration has increased but I will check it soon for science.
Oil consumption has reduced slightly. I am usually down 3/4 of a quart at 1000 miles, it was more like 1/2 this last time.
Upon reflection, the throatiness hasn't increased, but other engine "static noise" has decreased making good sounds more noticeable.
 
Reactions: HemiRick and 7991LXnSHO
D

Deleted member 38176

Mar 31, 2021
#7
  • Mar 31, 2021
  • #7
 
Reactions: Dubsport
I

Inneh

Member
Aug 4, 2020
24
4
13
Seattle, WA
Apr 8, 2021
#8
  • Apr 8, 2021
  • #8
Acceleration change is negligible, like I expected, but it was a detail I said I'd include.

At 900 miles, any changes seem to have leveled. Overall most notable benefits are reduced oil consumption and more crisp partial throttle response. Mpg seems a bit better but that's not reliable imo due to different driving habits/roads on different days. Engine certainly seems quieter in the right ways.

Was it worth it? For me, on this car, yes, only because my clock is over 200k miles and could benefit from a bit of internal tlc. I'm going for longevity at this point. Would I put it in ANY car I owned? Probably not, not at that price. It's not like that giant wing that adds 50 whp. But I'm pleased with the results on my specific engine. I would reserve this for older, very neglected cars that I didn't mind shelling out for a miracle (worth 100 bucks to keep it running longer).

I don't work for them, this was just my experience.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 38176

Narmalee

Member
Nov 5, 2014
64
18
18
Apr 15, 2021
#9
  • Apr 15, 2021
  • #9
7991LXnSHO said:
If it helped, I doubt it helped like by that method. Those sound like magic molecules. Tribotex is the actual brand? Nano particulate oil additive gets many Google hits, and most are for “mini ball bearing” friction reducers.

How Slick 50’s PTFE particles adhered to the metal was never proven. I rang up a lot of it, but wondered about what good it really did.
Click to expand...
projectfarm on YouTube did a trial of slick50... it was BAD
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Apr 18, 2021
#10
  • Apr 18, 2021
  • #10
Narmalee said:
projectfarm on YouTube did a trial of slick50... it was BAD
Click to expand...
Inneh said:
Acceleration change is negligible, like I expected, but it was a detail I said I'd include.

At 900 miles, any changes seem to have leveled. Overall most notable benefits are reduced oil consumption and more crisp partial throttle response. Mpg seems a bit better but that's not reliable imo due to different driving habits/roads on different days. Engine certainly seems quieter in the right ways.

Was it worth it? For me, on this car, yes, only because my clock is over 200k miles and could benefit from a bit of internal tlc. I'm going for longevity at this point. Would I put it in ANY car I owned? Probably not, not at that price. It's not like that giant wing that adds 50 whp. But I'm pleased with the results on my specific engine. I would reserve this for older, very neglected cars that I didn't mind shelling out for a miracle (worth 100 bucks to keep it running longer).

I don't work for them, this was just my experience.
Click to expand...

Just as I predicted. What a shock
 
I

Inneh

Member
Aug 4, 2020
24
4
13
Seattle, WA
Apr 18, 2021
#11
  • Apr 18, 2021
  • #11
Never said I expected or experienced a miracle, just satisfying curiosity. I'll try just about anything once. Honestly the difference is very similar to the "breathe easy" feeling after a long overdue oil change.

Bucket of bolts, sure. It's a bill, big deal.
Taken care of vehicle? Nah.

Always happy to provide entertainment, nf.
 

Narmalee

Member
Nov 5, 2014
64
18
18
May 9, 2021
#12
  • May 9, 2021
  • #12
Inneh said:
Never said I expected or experienced a miracle, just satisfying curiosity. I'll try just about anything once. Honestly the difference is very similar to the "breathe easy" feeling after a long overdue oil change.

Bucket of bolts, sure. It's a bill, big deal.
Taken care of vehicle? Nah.

Always happy to provide entertainment, nf.
Click to expand...
it basically ran for 10 minutes, then started smoking, lost 40 points of compression and when torn down the Teflon had collected all over the oil galleries inlets and pump and was sludging the progress of oiling and pretty much ruined the all bearings and rings

granted, this was on a lawnmower... but I doubt its going to magically do better in a nice high dollar engine lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Blue smoke..
  • Wicked_Rpm
  • Aug 11, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
474
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 14, 2024
weendoggy
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
New daily driver help needed.....not a mustang but mustang drivetrain.
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 17, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
5K
Other Auto Tech Jul 28, 2024
manicmechanic007
My 93 4v Fox
  • OffspringChaos
  • Aug 30, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2024
bird_dog0347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?