millhouse
Founding Member
2000xp8 said:Dag,
You know, i agree with alot of what you post, educated and informative. But in this instance, i however disagree. You don't need to have installed a turbo or have one to know that they don't make the best street cars, and if you are tough on a car, it's certainly not the way to go.
Maybe in the long run, they make more power, and definitely have a higher coolness factor, but that doesn't always translate into a great DD.
And Tx2000, you haven't mentioned any budget here, but a 331 dart, with h/c/i and a turbo kit is going to cost you well over 10,000 dollars. In fact the only way you could probably keep the engine cost below 15,000 is by building the turbo setup yourself like millhouse.
Car likely won't have a trouble cracking 600rwhp either.
One thing people seem to forget is there have been many…many oem vehicles which cam stock with turbo's. The problem with aftermarket turbo's has been the lack of knowledge on how to tune them. Over the past few years the popularity has grown to the point where tuners could no longer ignore the demands the turbo kit's placed on custom tunes. The technology now has grown to the point where there is no longer tuning issues incorporated with aftermarket turbo's. Yes…in this instance you can have your cake and eat it too!
On a side note…people also seem to forget that supercharges place quite a large strain on the crank. This in my mind was a HUGE determining factor in going turbo's (along with the coolness factor)
. Turbo's should (and I say should) allow you to run a bit more h/p…more safely. They should allows help with engine longevity compared to superchargers…not that it matters.
.
..Theres a guy here sirsureshot,his new name is tt91,he went that route but never put up great 1/4 mile times,and the thing was always apart fixing something!!I think Bob Cosby went twin turbo's back in the day but was only in the 10's