• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Welp, the shaker is out.......

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustang70
  • Start date Start date Aug 24, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Aug 24, 2004
#1
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #1
I emailed Grice, the guy that has the fordramair website, and he said, "A Victor Jr. and a shaker will never live on the same Mustang. I didn't realize how much taller the Victor Jr. is. I really wanted that shaker too. I was thinking of trying a Torker set up, but I've heard they're not much better then a dual plane set up. I guess there's always the Boss 9 scoop.
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Aug 24, 2004
#2
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #2
mustang70 said:
I emailed Grice, the guy that has the fordramair website, and he said, "A Victor Jr. and a shaker will never live on the same Mustang. I didn't realize how much taller the Victor Jr. is. I really wanted that shaker too. I was thinking of trying a Torker set up, but I've heard they're not much better then a dual plane set up. I guess there's always the Boss 9 scoop.
Click to expand...

YABUT, the Boss don't SHAKE
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Aug 24, 2004
#3
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #3
I had a Torker on a trans am with a shaker. The Torker was actually a little shorter than the factory manifold. I agree, the Torker is not much better than an RPM. Maybe a Weiend Stealth?
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Aug 24, 2004
#4
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #4
I just had a thought, how much higher is your manifold than stock?
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Aug 24, 2004
#5
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #5
I don't have the manifold yet. Maybe someone with one can get some measurements. I was thinking of cutting the base so that the part that rests on the carb can be raised. This would lower the rest of the assembly, I would just have to see what kind of interference I would have with everything else. Throttle linkage, distributor, etc.
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Aug 24, 2004
#6
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #6
mustang70 said:
I don't have the manifold yet. Maybe someone with one can get some measurements. I was thinking of cutting the base so that the part that rests on the carb can be raised. This would lower the rest of the assembly, I would just have to see what kind of interference I would have with everything else. Throttle linkage, distributor, etc.
Click to expand...

I was thinking of lowering it at the inside of the airfilter flat. that way it should clear all your linkage.

I don't know what the differences are, but I put an edlebrock carb on my 70 with the windsor and the airfilter was catching the throttle linkeage so I made a 1" adapter for the carb throat and it still clears the hood. What engine do you have?
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Aug 24, 2004
#7
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #7
I have a 351 Windsor. Do you have any pics of your set up?
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Aug 24, 2004
#8
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #8
mustang70 said:
I have a 351 Windsor. Do you have any pics of your set up?
Click to expand...
NO but send an email to my house acrad@adelphia.net and I'll check it out tonight and take some pix. I never measured to see how much hood clearance I have, but I know it doesn't touch. I can measure it tonight.
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Aug 24, 2004
#9
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #9
mustang70 said:
I have a 351 Windsor. Do you have any pics of your set up?
Click to expand...

I just went to Edelbrocks site, and your manifold average hight is only 1.75 inches higher than my Performer, and I lifted my air filter 1 inch, so your setup should only be .75 inches higher than mine. I don't know what teh stock manifold measures if someone could measure a stock manifold we would be sure.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Aug 24, 2004
#10
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #10
No one has mentioned lowering the engine. Is it so difficult that it shouldn't even be considered?
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Aug 24, 2004
#11
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #11
Hack said:
No one has mentioned lowering the engine. Is it so difficult that it shouldn't even be considered?
Click to expand...


Lowered engine=lowered tranny=lowered headers...none of which I want to deal with. It's easier to modify the bottom of an air cleaner then move an engine and tranny. At least in my opinion.
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Aug 25, 2004
#12
  • Aug 25, 2004
  • #12
mustang70 said:
Lowered engine=lowered tranny=lowered headers...none of which I want to deal with. It's easier to modify the bottom of an air cleaner then move an engine and tranny. At least in my opinion.
Click to expand...

OK, this is what I got, the manifold you want to use is 2.5 inches higher than stock. I don't have a shaker to play with, but I did do a search for pix and it looks like there is room to play with, not sure if we can get rid of 2.5, but it is possible.

Do you have a shaker you can play with? Right now I don't have anyone locally that has one I can look at. But I'll keep my eyes open.

PS; Just had another thought, you could get the shaker with any engine, I wonder if the 428 is a shorter shaker?
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Aug 25, 2004
#13
  • Aug 25, 2004
  • #13
Something I was wondering is if the base between a standard air cleaner and a shaker is different? If it's the same, I have a base from a 302 I can play with. I don't know anyone with a shaker. I'm pretty much going into this blind. Thank you for the help.
 
D

dmoody

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
789
0
17
Winston-Salem, NC
Aug 25, 2004
#14
  • Aug 25, 2004
  • #14
I have a shaker at home and there is no way you could take 2.5" of height out of my base. That would put the air cleaner lid projecting out of the hood. On shaker setups there is adjustment built in for left to right and front to back movement along the horizontal plane but nothing for vertical movement. To compensate for a taller intake you would have to cut the base and bring the air cleaner lid closer to the shaker. Using this method (which would be difficult) I don't see that you could possibly get more than an inch. I'd much rather simply change my intake manifold. Anyway I hope that helps.

d
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Aug 25, 2004
#15
  • Aug 25, 2004
  • #15
dmoody said:
I have a shaker at home and there is no way you could take 2.5" of height out of my base. That would put the air cleaner lid projecting out of the hood. On shaker setups there is adjustment built in for left to right and front to back movement along the horizontal plane but nothing for vertical movement. To compensate for a taller intake you would have to cut the base and bring the air cleaner lid closer to the shaker. Using this method (which would be difficult) I don't see that you could possibly get more than an inch. I'd much rather simply change my intake manifold. Anyway I hope that helps.

d
Click to expand...

Can you give me a measurement from the bottom of the actual scoop to the top of the filter can?
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 25, 2004
#16
  • Aug 25, 2004
  • #16
You are not giving the Torker intake enough credit.
Take it from experience, the Torkers are much more than just a Performer RPM wannabe.
The 351w version is only about an inch taller than stock manifold, if that.
Torker keeps bottom end as compared to Victor, but blows RPM away after 3k rpm or so.
IMO, Victor will only improve on the Torker slightly, after 4k rpm, then blow Torker away after 6-7k. Are you really needing that much rpm?
Dave
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Aug 25, 2004
#17
  • Aug 25, 2004
  • #17
Maybe you could find a low rise cowl induction hood, 2" or so that you could integrate the shaker into. It would look closer to the late model version.
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Aug 25, 2004
#18
  • Aug 25, 2004
  • #18
ratio411 said:
You are not giving the Torker intake enough credit.
Take it from experience, the Torkers are much more than just a Performer RPM wannabe.
The 351w version is only about an inch taller than stock manifold, if that.
Torker keeps bottom end as compared to Victor, but blows RPM away after 3k rpm or so.
IMO, Victor will only improve on the Torker slightly, after 4k rpm, then blow Torker away after 6-7k. Are you really needing that much rpm?
Dave
Click to expand...


I'm hoping to have all the power in by 6K. It's just a matter of cubic inches. I'm sure the torker does great on a 351, but what about a 427?

I don't want a cowl hood. It's not the look I want. This is why they call it hot rodding.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Aug 25, 2004
#19
  • Aug 25, 2004
  • #19
i would try to use an Air Gap RPM or Torker. The Air Gap uses some technology from the Victor, so it might be perfect. The Torker does too, so it'd be between them. i wouldn't sacrifice the shaker if its at all possible.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 26, 2004
#20
  • Aug 26, 2004
  • #20
SadbutTrue said:
i would try to use an Air Gap RPM or Torker. The Air Gap uses some technology from the Victor, so it might be perfect. The Torker does too, so it'd be between them. i wouldn't sacrifice the shaker if its at all possible.
Click to expand...
The Air Gap for the W is VERY tall if memory serves.
More than RPM and close to Victor.
The Torker is nearly stock height.
Dave
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
New sway bars. Now there is a clunk noise when turning full lock.
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 12, 2022
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
4
Views
3K
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 18, 2022
ChillPhatCat
A
I need help please!
  • Azhi23
  • Oct 26, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 1, 2022
limp
87 LX 'Vert
  • fun331
  • Jun 15, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 30, 2024
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?