• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Went to the dyno today... odd results..

  • Thread starter Thread starter EDGE Motorsport
  • Start date Start date Apr 4, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Dan02gt

mazing how much gas smell came from that tiny hole
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
909
415
113
Greenville, NC
Apr 4, 2005
#21
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #21
I thought the metric system used kilowatts to measure power not horse power. So your dyno may be reading in kilowatts. 1 KW = 1.34 HP so 250 KW x 1.34 = 335 HP which sounds about right.
 

EDGE Motorsport

Member
Sep 24, 2004
561
2
19
Saleen S281, London, UK
Apr 5, 2005
#22
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #22
it was definately reading in HP guys, maybe i should de-cat and see if that bumps the power up a bit ?

or take it to another dyno and see what it puts out..

EDGE
 
A

AcE XBOX

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
144
0
0
Apr 5, 2005
#23
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #23
Im putting 210/277 to the wheels on a 96 GT with just a K&N filter and an X-pipe.
 

EDGE Motorsport

Member
Sep 24, 2004
561
2
19
Saleen S281, London, UK
Apr 5, 2005
#24
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #24
210 to the wheels sounds about right to me for a 96, so 250 ish to the wheels might be ok for mine :S

i just spoke to the guy who tuned it again, apparently "the car has a few problems"...

this could get expensive...

EDGE
 

1fast03pony

Member
Jul 1, 2003
749
0
17
41
New york
Feb 15, 2006
#25
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #25
I just pulled my car on a DASTEK dyno, and it read 316 flywheel hp and 280 rwhp, with 302 tq and I dont have any engine mods save for a custom tune and magnaflow x, and magnapacks...


Any update on your car man?
 

98GTVortech

New Member
Sep 30, 2003
242
0
0
Philadelphia
Feb 16, 2006
#26
  • Feb 16, 2006
  • #26
98gt without my LT and methanol injection with 9 pounds of boost i pulled 320hp and 350 torque. I think that something must be wrong.. If i paid all that money for a SC i would be bitter..
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Feb 17, 2006
#27
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #27
1fast03pony said:
I just pulled my car on a DASTEK dyno, and it read 316 flywheel hp and 280 rwhp, with 302 tq and I dont have any engine mods save for a custom tune and magnaflow x, and magnapacks...


Any update on your car man?
Click to expand...

There is no way you're making 280RWHP with those mods. Get on a dynojet or a mustang dyno to get a correct reading.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Feb 17, 2006
#28
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #28
wow.. thats even higher than mine read on a crappy dyno lol.
 
0

'03GTinFLA

Member
May 29, 2004
486
0
17
St. Petersburg, FL
Feb 17, 2006
#29
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #29
san~man said:
There is no way you're making 280RWHP with those mods. Get on a dynojet or a mustang dyno to get a correct reading.
Click to expand...
:Word:
Are you missing a mod in your sig or something?
 

ironmedic

New Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,361
0
0
46
Puyallup, WA
www.geocities.com
Feb 17, 2006
#30
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #30
having fun driving around the UK in a stang? i was stationed at RAF Lakenheath and i had my 89 GT out there. i had a blast! showed the brits what american muscle is about
 

1fast03pony

Member
Jul 1, 2003
749
0
17
41
New york
Feb 17, 2006
#31
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #31
san~man said:
There is no way you're making 280RWHP with those mods. Get on a dynojet or a mustang dyno to get a correct reading.
Click to expand...


no ****, but why would this dyno read so high..

and moreover, why is the torque dead on?

302 on dynojet as well as the dastek

the hp is the only thing that seems inflated
 

ragu1585

Member
Jul 22, 2004
152
0
16
41
Spring, TX
Feb 17, 2006
#32
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #32
280 and 302.. hell thats more then my mach 1 was putting out.. sounds like those dynos are full of it!

My 98gt with exhaust, cai, and chip was 198hp and 269ft lbs
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Feb 17, 2006
#33
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #33
maybe your name should be just EDGE without the motorsports at the end.
 

1fast03pony

Member
Jul 1, 2003
749
0
17
41
New york
Feb 17, 2006
#34
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #34
well like i said the torque aint far off, with just magnapacks i laid down 289 rwtq..

these dasteks are supposed to be accurate, these guys i went to tune 800hp porsche race cars and have a race team..
I agree the number seems to be inflated but why.. whats the difference
 
G

guarddog

New Member
Jul 8, 2001
24
0
0
Alexandria, Virginia
Mar 19, 2006
#35
  • Mar 19, 2006
  • #35
It sounds a bit off to me, you should be around 315 w/ 9lbs boost. (That being said, how are you getting 9lbs w/ that supercharger? If you have the different pulley, maybe 8, and if stock pulley 5-6lbs.)

Also, regarding your earlier question, you do not want to run more than 8lbs boost with that supercharger as it has the old ball bearing system - which heats up a LOT and you're going to have problems if you over spin it.

Remember to change the oil every 3,000 miles with ATF (automatic transmission fluid type "F").

I just bought a used one, did a bit of research on it (or rather what little I could find). Its a good blower, but not mean to spin-up like the newer vortechs, novi/paxton/, procharger, etc.

Need more information, too. Like what was your A/F ratio.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
I
Fox Questions on my dyno results
  • ItsWay2fast4u
  • Sep 3, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 3, 2018
ItsWay2fast4u
I
I
Exorcising a '78
  • IICrew
  • Mar 29, 2020
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 13 14 15
Replies
287
Views
33K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Apr 14, 2023
IICrew
I
8
Shocked by Dyno Results - 1990 Mark VII with 5.0 HO
  • 88Mark7
  • Mar 12, 2018
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
7K
Other Auto Tech Oct 6, 2018
I Bleed Ford Blue
Unexpected Dyno Results D1 Mach1
  • AirTractor
  • May 9, 2017
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 10, 2017
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?