• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

what octane gas to run on drag strip?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 65notch
  • Start date Start date Mar 20, 2007

65notch

New Member
Jun 18, 2005
303
0
0
42
661 Cali
Mar 20, 2007
#1
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #1
im going to a test and tune tommorow and i'm curious if it would be worth buying some race gas and mixing with 91 to give me a higher octane...would this be benifical or pointless?
my mods are in my sig...thanks guys!
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
www.members.tripod.com
Mar 20, 2007
#2
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #2
you left out the most important spec- compression ratio.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
www.cardomain.com
Mar 20, 2007
#3
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #3
If it does not detonate with 36* of timing, you will not gain anything. Even 36* is a little high. It seems 34* is about all most motors need with modern heads.
 
S

Soaring1

Banned
Jan 3, 2003
144
1
0
Texas
Mar 20, 2007
#4
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #4
gas

What headers do you have?
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
46
Algonquin, IL
www.cardomain.com
Mar 20, 2007
#5
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #5
From what I have read and heard, you should use the lowest Octane your motor will allow, as higher Octanes actually burn slower and can cause a loss of HP in cars that don't need it. There was a test in a car magazine some time ago iwth dyno tests proving that.
 
S

Soaring1

Banned
Jan 3, 2003
144
1
0
Texas
Mar 20, 2007
#6
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #6
coolblue65 said:
From what I have read and heard, you should use the lowest Octane your motor will allow, as higher Octanes actually burn slower and can cause a loss of HP in cars that don't need it. There was a test in a car magazine some time ago iwth dyno tests proving that.
Click to expand...


Yep, that's true. I really don't see that you have enough engine to be worrying about the octane. Pump gas is just fine for your set-up.
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
55
Washington, MO
Mar 20, 2007
#7
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #7
Your fine with 91 or 93 pump gas. I learned the hard way after wasting my money on race fuel for a whole season until I learned that my car actually ran the best on good old 93 pump gas. I'll run some 100 low lead AV through it every once in awhile.
 

65notch

New Member
Jun 18, 2005
303
0
0
42
661 Cali
Mar 20, 2007
#8
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #8
paul302 said:
you left out the most important spec- compression ratio.
Click to expand...

i actually dont know my compression ratio, maybe sombody here can help me figure it out. i was running 9.5:1 with the stock 65 cast heads. now i have the edelbrocks with a 60cc chamber. is it possible to figure out compression ratio with this?


Soaring1
What headers do you have?
Click to expand...

i have patriot coated tri y's

brianj5600
If it does not detonate with 36* of timing, you will not gain anything. Even 36* is a little high. It seems 34* is about all most motors need with modern heads.
Click to expand...

im actually running like 30 at full advance, which is something else i have to mess with...
 
S

Soaring1

Banned
Jan 3, 2003
144
1
0
Texas
Mar 20, 2007
#9
  • Mar 20, 2007
  • #9
engine

No, you were running 10.3:1 ratio with the stock 289.
 

65notch

New Member
Jun 18, 2005
303
0
0
42
661 Cali
Mar 21, 2007
#10
  • Mar 21, 2007
  • #10
Soaring1 said:
No, you were running 10.3:1 ratio with the stock 289.
Click to expand...

the bottom end of the engine wasnt stock, just the heads were stock size. thats why i was at 9.5:1
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 21, 2007
#11
  • Mar 21, 2007
  • #11
About 9 to 1 with 60 cc heads. It ought to be fine with 87-89.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Chasing Vacuum leak 99 GT
  • EBNS_2005
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
165
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 3, 2026
X-cam34
X
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
416
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
Fox What gas do you run in your foxbody?
  • Mindseye007
  • May 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 19, 2024
Bullitt347
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
827
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?