• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

What size engine should I get (302, 308, 310)

  • Thread starter Thread starter bad68coupe
  • Start date Start date Aug 20, 2007

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Aug 20, 2007
#1
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #1
howdy ya'll, I have just gotten to the point of my build to where i can start building an engine. I know I want to go with a 302 basis, but my question is what are the advantages and disadvantages of going with a 308 or even a 310? Should the size affect what cam I buy?
I am building it from a shortblock up and so i can get whatever parts I need but i was just wondering if anyone has had experience with any of these sizes.
Thanks guys
 

callys

Member
Oct 14, 2005
76
0
7
Aug 20, 2007
#2
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #2
No point in boring it bigger than it has to be (that's where the extra cubes come from), that just limits you on future rebuilds. 8 cubic inches would not affect parts choice.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Aug 20, 2007
#3
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #3
You want 302 if possible, so that your block will be strong.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Aug 20, 2007
#4
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #4
Look into stroker kits.. 331 or 347 are actually pretty close to what you were going to spend on the bored out 302's.. just a thought..

Just me..........................

Thumper
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Aug 20, 2007
#5
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #5
a few cubes wont matter. i also would go with a stroker if you are looking to get more displacement. 302 to 306 means nothing. 302 to 331 means about 25hp roughly for otherwise identical specs.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Aug 20, 2007
#6
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #6
Before boring out too much I would look into stroking it first.
Kevin
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Aug 20, 2007
#7
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #7
331 or 347 gets my vote if you want to more/stroke it. If your in there, you might as well do it?
 
S

Steven Rupp

New Member
Jun 20, 2007
42
0
0
Anaheim Hills, CA
Aug 20, 2007
#8
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #8
It's true.. if your buying rotating parts then a stroker costs very little more to build. Stay close to 302 or go big with a stroker.
 

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Aug 20, 2007
#9
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #9
sorry what i forgot to specify earlier is that it will cost me the same to get a 310 as a 302 and stroking it will cost alot more than $0.00
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Aug 20, 2007
#10
  • Aug 20, 2007
  • #10
bad68coupe said:
sorry what i forgot to specify earlier is that it will cost me the same to get a 310 as a 302 and stroking it will cost alot more than $0.00
Click to expand...


I'd stay std bore or if needed bore .030. Its not worth it to gain the 8 CI IMO. Like others have said, you could always go .040 or .060 if needed down the road if something happens. If it doesn't need bored, stay std then.

If your going to make 1hp per cuinch your only gaining 8 hp. I doubt you would ever know it.

Now, if your buying some better quality parts like forged pistons then I'd go for the .030 variety. Reason being, if you decide to change to a stroker or a completely different setup down the road, your going to be able to sell 030 pistons much easier than std bored or 040 and 060 pistons.
 

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Aug 26, 2007
#11
  • Aug 26, 2007
  • #11
I guess what i was just kinda wondering was if i did lets just say, the 308, would that longer bore make the performance parts that i will put in the engine, more efficient? I figure the 302 stroke with performance parts is great, but then to have the 306, 308, 310 stroke would make those parts even better. I am jsut really thinking out loud, and don't really know the physics of it all, its really just theoretical
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Aug 26, 2007
#12
  • Aug 26, 2007
  • #12
Well then this is a math thing?? Cause, if you stroke for the same cost as you are going now ( Pistons/rods/ crankshaft) there is no contest!! IF you are keeping the 3.00 stroke and just boring the block... the 8 ci isnt worth the HP/Cost gains.

Say you get 400 BHP on a 302!! You will have 430 on a 347!! Cost for the 302 is the same as the 347 as far as block prep.. the rorating assy is the differance... if you keep all the stock stuff ( save pistons) then the add'l is what... 250-450.00 for pistons?? If you go to Hbeam ( or I beam) cost is the same.. new crank or stroker crank.. the cost is the same..... new pistons.. stroker pistons... the cost is the same!! cool//

SOOOOOoooooo.... as said.. this is a math thing?? Yes!?? Have fun..

Just me..............................

Thumper
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 26, 2007
#13
  • Aug 26, 2007
  • #13
bad68coupe said:
I guess what i was just kinda wondering was if i did lets just say, the 308, would that longer bore make the performance parts that i will put in the engine, more efficient? I figure the 302 stroke with performance parts is great, but then to have the 306, 308, 310 stroke would make those parts even better. I am jsut really thinking out loud, and don't really know the physics of it all, its really just theoretical
Click to expand...

You're misguided here in your thinking. All these three engine sizes ARE the same stroke. The bore or overbore rather, is different. A 302 has a bore x stroke of 4.00 x 3.00, a 306 is a 4.03 x 3.00, a 308 is 4.04 x 3.00, a 310 would be 4.06 x 3.00. Listen to the advice the others have given you There was a 3.1" stroker for the 302, but it's a rareity today.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Aug 26, 2007
#14
  • Aug 26, 2007
  • #14
I would not bore more then you have to. 30 overbore is plenty. Personally if I had a 68 I would be looking at a big block and not playing with small blocks. I would like to build a big block for my current mustang but if I had a classic it would definetally get a BBF.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 26, 2007
#15
  • Aug 26, 2007
  • #15
A stroker Windsor or Cleveland would be my choice, you'll have the best of both worlds. Easier to work on, lighter and have the torque of a big block. All that's based on starting with a small block 67-70 to start with. If it was a big block car already, then an FE would be the way to go
 
M

mikethebike

Member
Jun 12, 2007
358
0
17
Greenville, SC
Aug 29, 2007
#16
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #16
Here is the engine we are going to put in the FF kit car:
1. Dart II Sportsman block
2. Dart II cnc iron heads
3. Forged 3" crank
4. Crower 400 cid SBC rods with 280,000 psi bolts
5. High silicone content Keith Black pistons
6. Whatever cam Dart says will max power at 7500 and then die
7. Gear drive cam
8. Don't know the name but it's that after market mass air flow fi system (he already has it)
9. Full roller rockers
10. Titanium intake/sodium filled exhaust valves.
 
S

Soaring1

Banned
Jan 3, 2003
144
1
0
Texas
Aug 29, 2007
#17
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #17
bad68coupe said:
howdy ya'll, I have just gotten to the point of my build to where i can start building an engine. I know I want to go with a 302 basis, but my question is what are the advantages and disadvantages of going with a 308 or even a 310? Should the size affect what cam I buy?
I am building it from a shortblock up and so i can get whatever parts I need but i was just wondering if anyone has had experience with any of these sizes.
Thanks guys
Click to expand...

If you have to start with buying an engine, and not overhauling one that you already own, then I would also recommend a 351 and stroke it. That will be all the power you will ever need and a lot of fun to drive. If you are going to stick to the 302 block, then stroke it for almost the same price as a standard overhaul.
 
Reactions: 93notchback347!

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Aug 30, 2007
#18
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #18
mikethebike said:
Here is the engine we are going to put in the FF kit car:
1. Dart II Sportsman block
2. Dart II cnc iron heads
3. Forged 3" crank
4. Crower 400 cid SBC rods with 280,000 psi bolts
5. High silicone content Keith Black pistons
6. Whatever cam Dart says will max power at 7500 and then die
7. Gear drive cam
8. Don't know the name but it's that after market mass air flow fi system (he already has it)
9. Full roller rockers
10. Titanium intake/sodium filled exhaust valves.
Click to expand...

Christ.. it must be nice to have all that money for a 7500 rpm engine!!

Here is what we have and build today..7500 rpm shift points.
Stock early 302 block, w/ studs/ and stud girdle/ oil wind-age
Stock rods w/ arps bolts re sized / floated pins
forged light weight pistons .. lots of good choices out there
Stock 2M early crankshaft
Gear drive
Stainless steel valves , under cut stems, swirl polished
Springs for cam and titanium retainers
Induction.. intake for power from turns to top rpm of 7500-7800 rpm
Rotating assy balanced/ blueprinted/ block work the same/ crankshaft the same..
Heads.. Ported GT40s with upgraded valve train and studs

We must have saved at least more than HALF the cost.. reliability is good for the full season and then tear down, just in weight on the block and heads.. we can be 50 HP less and still pull in the straights!! Yes?? Just another way to race on a smaller budget.. cool?? 302 cubes rock!!

Just me.........................................................

Thumper
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Aug 31, 2007
#19
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #19
bad68coupe said:
1.) I know I want to go with a 302 basis, but my question is what are the advantages and disadvantages of going with a 308 or even a 310?

2.)Should the size affect what cam I buy?
Click to expand...

1.) The only difference between a 302, 306, 308, and 310 is the bore size. An .030" overbore will net 306ci, .040" = 308, and .060" = 310. Advantages Are maybe a couple horsepower and a few pounds of torque. Disadvantages are thin cylinders and potential cooling problems. Early 289 and 302 blocks can usually hold an .060" overbore, but it's unecessary to go that far for anything but damaged cylinders or maybe the second or third rebuild. I prefer to be conservative on an overbore.

2.) It will have very little bearing on what off-the-shelf cam you pick. A custom cam grinder will take it into consideration because it is part of the calculations they do, but you don't need to worry about it.

If your engine is a standard 4.00" bore right now and needs an overbore, just go with .030".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
227
Other Auto Tech Monday at 1:17 PM
General karthief
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
16
Views
580
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 7, 2026
X-cam34
X
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
880
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?