• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

What to use...FMS "B" Cam or "E" Cam ???

  • Thread starter Thread starter Katmandu
  • Start date Start date Sep 11, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Sep 12, 2006
#21
  • Sep 12, 2006
  • #21
I would use a TFS 1 cam, it costs about the same as an e cam but its better.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Sep 12, 2006
#22
  • Sep 12, 2006
  • #22
There is nothing wrong with the e or b cam. For a mild H/I/C setup it will be just fine. No doubt a custom cam is the alpha and omega of performance cams but largely unnecessary for his setup considering his budget upgrades. The E cam is fine for a street car with a little lope and good driving characteristics. I personally would recommend taking a look at the TFS stage 1. I have had both(currently running the E to comply with CARB in CA) and the TFS is a better cam and can be had for less money. Good luck with your upgrade.
Kevin
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Sep 12, 2006
#23
  • Sep 12, 2006
  • #23
Theres better OTS cams available than those old outdated B and E cams.
In the 5.0L Dyno Test book,Richard Holdener says the time for the B cam has come and gone.

I wouldn`t use either one these days.

The B cam was the very first performance roller cam for the 5.0L I believe.Maybe this is why it`s still kind of popular.
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Sep 13, 2006
#24
  • Sep 13, 2006
  • #24
I have used both on a few different cars and I personally like the E-cam. The B-cam just doesn't seem to start pulling till later in the RPM band compared to the E-cam. I will add that I have always installed them straight up so it may work better with some advance. Didnt have problems with either one dying at lights or anything goofy like that. Neither one will sound stock by any means but the B definately has a lumpier idle than the E. Now that that is out of the way, if I hax X amount of dollars to spend on any cam in that price range, I would probably give the TFS stage 1 a shot. Have heard nothing but good things about it but I have also never had a chance to try one myself because I always seem to happen across brother-in-law deals on alphabet cams and I imagine thats where you are at as well.
 

Busted07

I need my gorilla to be about an inch longer.
Nov 15, 2005
0
3
0
Sep 13, 2006
#25
  • Sep 13, 2006
  • #25
MrKwik said:
I would probably give the TFS stage 1 a shot. Have heard nothing but good things about it.
Click to expand...

+1 for never hearing anyting bad about those cams, thats why i bought a TFS stage II for mine.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 13, 2006
#26
  • Sep 13, 2006
  • #26
5ive.oh said:
Or anyone with a difference of opinion.
Click to expand...

I agree with ya...a few on there think they are "pros"...well...

Stick with an alphabet cam, nothing wrong with it for that combo IMO.
 

MadDAWG_zr2

New Member
Jan 6, 2004
64
0
0
Sep 13, 2006
#27
  • Sep 13, 2006
  • #27
I'm running an E cam with 1.7s. It was a little lazy on the bottom end so on the advise of "Thumper" I advanced it 4 degrees. Wow! what a differance it made. I know a lot of guys advance the B-cam as well even though it had a 5 degree advance ground into it. Advancing it would put the ICL around 103. I'd say use what you got and see if you like it. If the Ecam is real cheap buy it anyway as a back up and sell it if you end up happy with the B. cam.

Then again what do I know. If I belived everything I read my car should just be throw away with all its "junk" parts.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
carb vs cam help needed
  • forango
  • May 2, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2025
forango
F
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
H
Engine new engine troubles
  • hawkinsdrag
  • Nov 6, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 10, 2022
Monkeybutt2000
M
Y
Dyno Comparison for TFS 44cc Ported Heads vs PI Ported Heads with same VT Stage 2 Cams
  • Yel2002GTAuto
  • Oct 13, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
9K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 29, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?