• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

what type of heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter XavB
  • Start date Start date Jul 16, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

XavB

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
74
0
0
Honolulu, HI
Jul 16, 2007
#1
  • Jul 16, 2007
  • #1
Sorry another "what type of head" thread but I'm lost of this. So far I have an Edelbrock Victor EFI upper and lower, and a E303 cam (these are not on the car yet). The is my only car and driven daily. Other mods are BBK o/r h, BBK shorty headers, 2chamber flows, BBK 65mm TB, an electric fann and 4.10s. I will be switching it over to a 5speed in the next couple of weeks. Just a rebuilt T5. Any opinions on what type of heads? Thanks.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,027
1,618
194
NJ
Jul 16, 2007
#2
  • Jul 16, 2007
  • #2
First off, IMO, trade your intake down for an rpm.
The victor efi is a short runner high rpm intake used in car that usually exceed 6000rpm, which your car is not going to do with an E cam.
Use Twisted wedge or Track heat tfs heads. Some will say Afrs, but they cost more and do no better than the tfs heads. No need for a pissing contest like always, performance is very similar, just one set is $200 cheaper.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 17, 2007
#3
  • Jul 17, 2007
  • #3
2000xp8 said:
First off, IMO, trade your intake down for an rpm.
The victor efi is a short runner high rpm intake used in car that usually exceed 6000rpm, which your car is not going to do with an E cam.
Use Twisted wedge or Track heat tfs heads. Some will say Afrs, but they cost more and do no better than the tfs heads. No need for a pissing contest like always, performance is very similar, just one set is $200 cheaper.
Click to expand...

Well it is those comments that cause the 'peeing' contest

I did lots of research on what makes the most power under the curve and went with the advice of the custom cam grinder, Ed Curtis. He suggested AFR 165's. I have had both heads, new, in front of me. I like the afr's
 

XavB

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
74
0
0
Honolulu, HI
Jul 23, 2007
#4
  • Jul 23, 2007
  • #4
what is the difference between the track heat and twisted wedge that would lead me toward one or the other? i see on 50resto.com that you can order the twisted wedge with the upgrade springs like the ones on the track heats. if you do that they come out to about the same price as the heats. would it be better to just buy the track heats?
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
Jul 23, 2007
#5
  • Jul 23, 2007
  • #5
The twisted wedge heads have different combustion chambers.
 
9

95GTAODE

New Member
Nov 25, 2004
200
2
0
Jul 24, 2007
#6
  • Jul 24, 2007
  • #6
They are the same head. The base or "Street Heats" are drilled for smog, while the "Track Heats" are not and come with the upgraded springs.
 

white99gt

Founding Member
Aug 8, 2000
4,649
1
0
stockbridge,Ga(near atlanta)
Jul 24, 2007
#7
  • Jul 24, 2007
  • #7
LOL..For a street car any good alum head will do.I say drop the intake for a ported cobra or explorer intake.

As far what head is better ,it really boils down to is COMBO's..I run what some would call wimp heads (performer 5.0's).But from what ive seen ,mine makes just as good of power as most afr,trick flow packages out there.
Also not sure on emissions but a good set of longtubes will help a LOT..
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 24, 2007
#8
  • Jul 24, 2007
  • #8
Very little difference between shorties and longtubes...

I have had both Same primaries, just different design, same performance
 

white99gt

Founding Member
Aug 8, 2000
4,649
1
0
stockbridge,Ga(near atlanta)
Jul 24, 2007
#9
  • Jul 24, 2007
  • #9
5spd GT said:
Very little difference between shorties and longtubes...

I have had both Same primaries, just different design, same performance
Click to expand...


actually no ..only difference in the two dynos was fms caoted shorties w a o/r xpipe(blue)..Vs coated (inside and out) bbk longtubes w o/r hpipe .No change in the tune,hotter the last dyno time,and on the same dyno..

dyno

temps:

air fuel:
 

Attachments

  • dynocompair.webp
    37.9 KB · Views: 135
  • dynotemps.webp
    38.1 KB · Views: 122
  • airfuel.webp
    40.5 KB · Views: 117
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Jul 24, 2007
#10
  • Jul 24, 2007
  • #10
5spd GT said:
Well it is those comments that cause the 'peeing' contest
Click to expand...

Actually, it's comments like these:
I did lots of research on what makes the most power under the curve and went with the advice of the custom cam grinder, Ed Curtis. He suggested AFR 165's. I have had both heads, new, in front of me. I like the afr's
Click to expand...
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Jul 25, 2007
#11
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #11
So your telling me that you made 30 more hp and 42 more tq AT THE WHEELS when you switched FROM long tubes and O/R H TO shorties and O/R X!!!! i cant believe that...Sorry
 

white99gt

Founding Member
Aug 8, 2000
4,649
1
0
stockbridge,Ga(near atlanta)
Jul 25, 2007
#12
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #12
ninety15.0 said:
So your telling me that you made 30 more hp and 42 more tq AT THE WHEELS when you switched FROM long tubes and O/R H TO shorties and O/R X!!!! i cant believe that...Sorry
Click to expand...


Really dont care what u believe thats the only changes to MY car..Nothing in the tune,no other parts etc.

Been doing this to many years to be worried about being called a bs artiest.

Note it was already a h/c/i car just with shorty exhaust.
 

XavB

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
74
0
0
Honolulu, HI
Jul 25, 2007
#13
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #13
ok one more thing, i'm looking at the Twisted Wedges, but they sell them with the o-rings and without. would i need a set that has been o-ringed? why would someone need a set that has been o-ringed?
 

ShortThrow50

Member
Oct 22, 2006
923
2
16
Pa
Jul 25, 2007
#14
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #14
Your gonna have to change out those 410's if you are going with a regular t5
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 25, 2007
#15
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #15
Daggar said:
Actually, it's comments like these:
Click to expand...

I just went with what Ed said...

It just happened to coincide with what I had seen...

99whitegt - I have seen dynos between the two...never seen a gain like that. I wish I would have made a gain like that
 

jtfairlane

New Member
Mar 5, 2006
468
3
0
Jul 25, 2007
#16
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #16
If you don't know what o-ringed heads are for, and were thinking of using a Victor EFI intake on a daily driver......a Victor EFI intake with an E cam no less.......above all other things I would recommend you not buy another damn part for this car before you have a better idea of what you are doing.

O-ringed heads are designed for special head gaskets with metal o-rings that slip into the grooves cut into the surface of the heads. These are used for better gasket retention, typically in conjunction with head studs, in boosted applications where your nitrous, supercharger, or whatever's boost is essentially trying to blow the heads off the block.

Your E303 cam is a downright terrible mismatch for the Victor EFI intake. One of them has to go. Seeing as how your driving it daily, ditch the Victor.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,027
1,618
194
NJ
Jul 25, 2007
#17
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #17
fairlane's opinion may be a bit harsh, but it's true, that's exactly why i said the same thing above.

As far as heads, don't write off any aluminum head, i'm still a fan of gt40x's, and the price has come down on them again i think, i think new they can now be found under a grand.
And still the best NA stock shortblock combo i've seen run to date (in a regular full wieght street car) was gt40x's e cam, real gt40 intake, and that was 11.80's@116.
 

XavB

New Member
Mar 9, 2003
74
0
0
Honolulu, HI
Jul 25, 2007
#18
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #18
thanks for that explanation. as i have been doing more research since my original post i have decided to ditch the e cam, and go with some other cam (after some more research ofcourse) that will suit which ever set up i go with and have actually been thinking of selling the victor also. i got it for cheap here locally...which is hard to do, so i bought it for $300 just in case i could use it later. also, thanks for that info on the o-rings.
 

white99gt

Founding Member
Aug 8, 2000
4,649
1
0
stockbridge,Ga(near atlanta)
Jul 25, 2007
#19
  • Jul 25, 2007
  • #19
5spd GT said:
I just went with what Ed said...

It just happened to coincide with what I had seen...

99whitegt - I have seen dynos between the two...never seen a gain like that. I wish I would have made a gain like that
Click to expand...


I know not every car is the same ,but some saying longtubes are not worth it is just plain wrong..

Its all about combo's..
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Jul 26, 2007
#20
  • Jul 26, 2007
  • #20
white99gt said:
Really dont care what u believe thats the only changes to MY car..Nothing in the tune,no other parts etc.

Been doing this to many years to be worried about being called a bs artiest.

Note it was already a h/c/i car just with shorty exhaust.
Click to expand...

Dude I'm confused here...you say the car was already HCI with a shorty exhaust? So are those gains from switching TO longtubes or are they from switching TO Shorties?

I find it hard to believe that everyone in the high performance industry uses long tubes...i wonder why they would do that if the cheaper and easier to instal shorties made more power...substantially more power?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
414
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
770
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
717
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?