• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

whats kind of heads will interchange with my 351m

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangrfast88
  • Start date Start date Jan 24, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
M

mustangrfast88

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2002
330
0
0
middletown ohio
Jan 24, 2004
#1
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #1
hi guys in need some help, it is not a mustang question but it is a engine question. i have a 351m in my truck and want to get alittle more power out of it and was woundering what kind of heads will interchange onto the 351m.
i have planned to do a cam heads and intake and full exhaust on it but i need to know what kind of heads will interchange.
i have found a set of i think 351 cleavland or windsor heads but dont know if they will work so if anybody has a answer for me i will be a happy camper or if you guys know of any other heads that will fit my 351m that will give it some more power thanks alot
matt
 

jcp123

New Member
Nov 1, 2003
408
0
0
Tyler, TX
Jan 24, 2004
#2
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #2
-i'm not sure, but i think the cleveland heads should work? the 351 m was loosely based on the cleveland. if i recall correctly, though, the cleveland heads will create some space problems with the intake manifold. you might be better off porting the hell outa the m-heads. windsor heads will not work.
-there are many good cams out there for the m, so you're right on there
-same for the intakes, plenty of good ones out there
-not sure, but i assume there are some headers out there...
-if you're up to taking the engine apart, find a 400m crank and make a 400 outa that sucker
 

makarov

New Member
Jul 9, 2003
180
0
0
Forestville, CA
Jan 24, 2004
#3
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #3
The c's have to be port matched and shimmed, the w's have to have major bolt hole mods. The 400m's might work, but I don't see much improvement over the 351's. I had a 400m with .050 shaved 351m heads for my dirt car, rv cam, had to run the 2bbl carb due to class. Scads of torque. (By the way, I believe edelbrock was the only aftermarket for 4bbl manifolds). If you can find a 400m block, it's an easy swap and you can use your 351m heads and most other parts. These blocks were produced during the oil crisis and CA emissions b.s., and although the "m" stands for modified, it in no way reflected the modifications toward performance. But they do produce monster torque. Hope that helps, and what more could one want in a truck?
 

jcp123

New Member
Nov 1, 2003
408
0
0
Tyler, TX
Jan 24, 2004
#4
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #4
351 and 400 blocks were the same, weren't they?? at least, i thought so...
 
M

mustangrfast88

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2002
330
0
0
middletown ohio
Jan 24, 2004
#5
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #5
i am kind of new on the 351 stuff but when you say port matched and shimmed what do you mean, so if the cleavland heads will work what do i have to do to them to make them work
 
M

mustangrfast88

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2002
330
0
0
middletown ohio
Jan 24, 2004
#6
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #6
i am not taking the engine out of the truck so a 400 crank is out of the question, but i think heads cam intake headers and new oil pump and it will run like a champ again

here is what i got planned
351c heads
edlebrock 4 barrel intake
rv cam
750 carb
headers
new oil pump
 

makarov

New Member
Jul 9, 2003
180
0
0
Forestville, CA
Jan 24, 2004
#7
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #7
jcp, I believe they were identical, with the exception of the crank and rods, therefore (in my mind), why the 351m heads fit to a "t".

Fast88, I'm old and this was a while ago. I'm certain that major porting was necessary to align the heads and intake, as well as shims to make the intake fit on the heads. I just can't remember if it was the c manifold or the m. Sorry I can't help you more.
 

gearheadboy

15 Year Member
Jan 15, 2003
1,425
177
84
Greencastle Pa
Jan 24, 2004
#8
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #8
351Cleveland, 351Modified=400, have interchangeble heads, along with the 428 I believe. The 351 windsor, 302 windsor or any small block Ford, for that matter, heads would fit with mods, however, the best thing about the Cleveland was the heads, worst being the oiling system. The windsor had a great oiling system, crap heads in comparioson to the cleveland. Thus a smart man, made a CLEAVOR, a 351w with cleveland heads. The only problem was there was no manifold that had the correct intake ports. So, yes edelbrock makes one. Also some Aussie built Fords came this way.
At any rate, you need a set of Clevland heads.
(2v and 4v are differant) To make it worth your while, get the 4v and a 4v intake manifold. You'll be impressed how it wakes up that anchor you got now.
 
M

mustangrfast88

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2002
330
0
0
middletown ohio
Jan 24, 2004
#9
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #9
well the truck is just a play truck and a track duty truck to get the car to the track it aint my daily driver so yuo think the 4v heads and intake will really wake it up
 
3

351crules

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
19
0
0
chicopee,mass
Jan 24, 2004
#10
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #10
you don't want 4bl heads for a truck to big. the best heads would be off a 2bl clealand not 351m or 400. the ehaust port in the m heads sucks. it has a bigger water passage around the valve and takes up alot of room.
 
M

mustangrfast88

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2002
330
0
0
middletown ohio
Jan 24, 2004
#11
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #11
well the truck is just a play truck and a track duty truck to get the car to the track it aint my daily driver so yuo think the 4v heads and 4v intake will really wake it up with a rv cam and a 4 barrel carb and some exhaust
 
3

351crules

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
19
0
0
chicopee,mass
Jan 24, 2004
#12
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #12
putting a 4bl head will be a pain in the ass. there is no intake for that. you would have to port the living crap out of one for it to fit. i built my brothers motor for his 81 f-150 4x4 and it beats or kepts up with mustangs.(no bs)
most likely close to stock ones

motor
400cid, 2bl heads just a quick clean up in the bowls, flat tops
elebrock performer,600 vac sec.
comp 268 hyd.cam,stock manifolds, duel exhaust
 

thegabrielles

Member
Feb 26, 2003
516
1
16
Atlanta Georgia
Jan 24, 2004
#13
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #13
Well, my 2 cents...
Go with the 2bbl clevelands. I ran a 302 "street boss" or "clevor" engine for a while. The Valves and ports are huge even on the 2bbl heads. Unless you are planning huge RPM and Comp there is no need for any moptor to have valve sizes of the 4bbl 351C heads. I am not sure if any mods are necessary but there was not that much involved to put them on my 302 so it should not be to bad if you need to modify. I thought they just bolted up though? But then again, that thinking thing has got me into trouble before.
 
E

eric88gt

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2000
163
0
16
Chisholm, MN
Jan 24, 2004
#14
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #14
Get the 2bbl cleveland heads, they'll work a lot better than the 4bbl's, especially for a truck. You could also look at getting some aussie 2bbl heads, they have a closed chamber and would bump up the compression a little bit.
 

thegabrielles

Member
Feb 26, 2003
516
1
16
Atlanta Georgia
Jan 24, 2004
#15
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #15
Yeah thats what I ran on mine ( the aussie heads), not so easy to find around here but I had a friend in Austrailia, he got me two sets, the second after I grenaded the motor. The power was amazing out of them above 3500rpm, but the stock 2bbl heads have 1.78 intake and 2.12" exhaust valve, thats way big, your cam choices will be very important. Make sure to research with several companies to get the one right for your combo. BTW my 302 was making about 350hp and was a very streetable daily driver. Got 18mpg in the city and 22 on the Highway. The torque was lacking though. Like I said the motor did not start pulling real hard till 3500rpm, and then it pulled hard to 6500
 

thegabrielles

Member
Feb 26, 2003
516
1
16
Atlanta Georgia
Jan 24, 2004
#16
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #16
BTW the aussie heads have a 58cc combustion chamber, it was good for 10.2:1 comp ratio with flat top pistons and I had plenty of clearence with the valves. Not sure what the USA 351C 2BBL have, But I think they are 63cc??
 

jcp123

New Member
Nov 1, 2003
408
0
0
Tyler, TX
Jan 25, 2004
#17
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #17
i agree, do NOT get the 4v heads for a tow vehicle - major PITA. my dad has those, he's got a '73 mach 1. it's the most cold-natured thing i've ever driven, and it hesitates like mad. they are just good for top-end (4000+) power (but lots of it). if you have to swap the C heads on there, make sure it's the 2v heads
 
M

mustangrfast88

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2002
330
0
0
middletown ohio
Jan 25, 2004
#18
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #18
so you guys are saying the 2v heads will work better on my truck then putting some 4v heads on it??? so if i put some 2 v heads on it i want the closed camber right, and if i use the 2v heads the edelbrock perfomer 400 intake will be a direct bolt on.
so does this sound like a better shopping list
351c 2v heads closed chamber
edelbrock pperfomer 400 intake
rv/ pulling cam
new exhaust system headers, and mac mufflers exit in front of rear wheel
new oil pump
new timing chain
anything eles you guys can think of
and any of thoise part any of you guy got laying around and want to sell for a good price pm me on them thanks matt
 
M

mustangrfast88

Founding Member
Sep 22, 2002
330
0
0
middletown ohio
Jan 25, 2004
#19
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #19
so nobody has any of those parts that they want to sell
 

351LX

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2001
1,007
0
0
Regina, Saskatchewan
Jan 25, 2004
#20
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #20
351c 2 bbl are almost identical to 351m-400 heads.The 351m-400 heads produced after 1975 with the D5 at the beginning of the casting number had a change in the exhaust port so it doesn't flow as well as the earlier ones.The Aussie 351c heads have a smaller combustion chamber for more compression but essentially the same ports as the early 351c 2 bbl heads.The Aussie heads can be found easily on eBay as well as different aftermarket 4 bbl manifolds.Most 351c,351m and 400 heads have a multiple groove system for the valve locks.The stock ford valves have a reputation for popping the end off when stressed so it is recommended you get some aftermarket ones.Starting around 1979 Ford Ford started using the single groove valve locks in 351m heads so these are better.A couple of real good sources of info on 351m motors are the forums at the Ford Truck enthusiast site http://www.ford-trucks.com/ and the cleveland forum on Network 54 http://www.network54.com/Hide/Forum/119419
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
931
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
T
Oil burning on my recently buil 302
  • The blk67
  • May 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
161
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2026
Noobz347
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
96
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
321
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?