• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Whats your favorite era?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cobain03
  • Start date Start date Feb 5, 2006

favorite era?

  • 64- 66

    Votes: 23 26.4%
  • 67-68

    Votes: 32 36.8%
  • 69-70

    Votes: 24 27.6%
  • 71 -73

    Votes: 8 9.2%

  • Total voters
    87
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last

jes72mustang

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
224
1
0
S. Central PA
Feb 6, 2006
#21
  • Feb 6, 2006
  • #21
I have to Agree with 72Grande,
I like the big body Stangs, as I am also the proud owner of a 72 grande.

One thing I like about the coupes is they are not as popular as the sportsroof models, so they are just a little bit different when you go to a cruise or carshow.
 

RFMustangGT

Member
Apr 4, 2005
294
0
16
Knoxville,TN
Feb 6, 2006
#22
  • Feb 6, 2006
  • #22
zookeeper said:
Wouldn't the '69-'70 Boss 429 Mustangs kinda qualify as musclecars? Or the '67 GT500, or the '68 1/2 Cobra Jet Mustangs?
Click to expand...

IMO, if you were to only pick one mustang from the 64-73 era to best desrcibe a mustang muscle car, it has to be the 69-70 Boss 429 hands down. meanest looking stang with a semi hemi big block V8.
 

krash kendall

Active Member
Nov 19, 2004
1,258
0
36
Aldergrove, B.C. Canada
Feb 6, 2006
#23
  • Feb 6, 2006
  • #23
'65-'66 - smallest, lightest, simplist. Pretty much a plug and play car.
 

72grande

Founding Member
May 27, 2002
676
0
0
Sunny D
Feb 6, 2006
#24
  • Feb 6, 2006
  • #24
I dont blame you guys. I hated the 71-73's till I owned one. If you get it out of your head that they should look like mustangs, and judge them as if they were a totaly differnt model car, they are pretty cool. The fact it will swallow a 460 easily is just gravy.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Feb 6, 2006
#25
  • Feb 6, 2006
  • #25
I voted 67-68 but I prefer the 65-66 more than the 68. No offense but the things they changed in 68 were ALL for the worse except the 428, in my opinion. The 67 had all of the early model styling cues combined with the mechanical improvements of the latter years, without the bloat, fake wood, and psychedelic stuff.
 

NoKitten

New Member
Dec 14, 2002
189
0
0
Room 117
Feb 7, 2006
#26
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #26
69-70 due to the 429.
 
P

pursang

71-73 Mustang Lover
Feb 5, 2006
0
0
0
B.C. Okanagan. Canada.
Feb 7, 2006
#27
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #27
Yeah sorry the 71-73s are garbage !!! too bad you guys blew your money on such a huge pile of ****, my grabber blue 70 Torino 429SCJ. 4spd was drop dead gorgeous, especially with the hidaways and I probably paid a lot less for it than your tankstangs. IMHO.
 
P

pursang

71-73 Mustang Lover
Feb 5, 2006
0
0
0
B.C. Okanagan. Canada.
Feb 7, 2006
#28
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #28
1970 Torino GT 429SCJ. 4spd.
Are the 71-73s better than this ?

View attachment 488260
 

krash kendall

Active Member
Nov 19, 2004
1,258
0
36
Aldergrove, B.C. Canada
Feb 7, 2006
#29
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #29
I love those Ford dogdishes!
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Feb 7, 2006
#30
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #30
69-70.
 

72grande

Founding Member
May 27, 2002
676
0
0
Sunny D
Feb 7, 2006
#31
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #31
pursang said:
I probably paid a lot less for it than your tankstangs. IMHO.
Click to expand...

I prefer moosestang, if you please.

I was just sitting around one day, minding my own, when i got a call from my uncle. He says "Remeber that old mustang sitting in my drivway? If you want it you can have it, but you gotta get it off my property by the end of the week or I'm towing it to the junkyard." The rest, is history.But you see, it would be quite impossible for you to have paid less for your '****ino'. neener

Besides, did they ever make, convertable toronto's?



 
1

19stang66

Member
Apr 16, 2003
689
0
16
Feb 7, 2006
#32
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #32
65-66, because of smaller body and sexy fastbacks, dream car is a 65-66 fastback
 
P

pursang

71-73 Mustang Lover
Feb 5, 2006
0
0
0
B.C. Okanagan. Canada.
Feb 8, 2006
#33
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #33
70-71 Torino's way sexier than 71-73 Tankstangboats.
Waste of time money and effort, rather have a german capri with V8. or even a camero !
 
P

pursang

71-73 Mustang Lover
Feb 5, 2006
0
0
0
B.C. Okanagan. Canada.
Feb 8, 2006
#34
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #34
Only way I would ever own an huge 71-73 tankstang is if it were a BB 4spd FB Mach 1 dark blue w black stripes, if it was given to me, as for that crate you have 72grande I would've let your uncle take it to the junk yard !!! I'll keep my Torino till I get a 67 or 69 Mustang.

View attachment 488115
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Feb 8, 2006
#35
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #35
pursang said:
or even a camero !
Click to expand...

Okay bud, now you have gone too far!
amnit: crapola
 

72grande

Founding Member
May 27, 2002
676
0
0
Sunny D
Feb 8, 2006
#36
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #36
wait a minnute, you dont even have a stang? Now I feel lied to. How can I even be sure thats your tonto?
 

stangkid88

New Member
Nov 11, 2005
112
0
0
Seattle area
Feb 8, 2006
#37
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #37
65-66, but I'm starting to like the look of the '69 more and more
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Feb 8, 2006
#38
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #38
What's this guy's deal?
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Feb 8, 2006
#39
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #39
FWIW, my first Mustang love was the 69 Mach-1, it is still #2 in my book.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Feb 8, 2006
#40
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #40
I like them all but my fav is of course the 65-66 cars.

They are a little more boxy and that's exactly what I like about them.

My close second would be the 69 Mach I...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Progress Thread Today in the shed........
  • Don7Up
  • May 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
930
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
Don7Up
D
T5 identification
  • 3054tony
  • May 16, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
456
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
AeroCoupe
L
Can anyone tell me what this is hanging under my car?
  • Luckysgirl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
177
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
Noobz347
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
G
Octane on the 5.0 Coyote
  • gray owl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
7
Views
249
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?