• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Whats your favorite era?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cobain03
  • Start date Start date Feb 5, 2006

favorite era?

  • 64- 66

    Votes: 23 26.4%
  • 67-68

    Votes: 32 36.8%
  • 69-70

    Votes: 24 27.6%
  • 71 -73

    Votes: 8 9.2%

  • Total voters
    87
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5

doug68hoss

Founding Member
Jan 21, 2001
413
0
16
australia..along ways from my stangs
Mar 3, 2006
#81
  • Mar 3, 2006
  • #81
68..i have driving my 65 more lately..but the 65 looks more girly especailly the tail light panel..the 68 tail light panel which the curve inward in all looks cooler......maybe it is the poppy red color that makes it good girly on the 65
 

CarFreakGT

20+ Year Stangneter
May 26, 2003
395
11
29
Louisville, KY
Mar 19, 2006
#82
  • Mar 19, 2006
  • #82
chepsk8 said:
67-68, as they were still small, yet had harder body lines.
Click to expand...

Well said. They look a little meaner than the 65-66. Not to mention, I just bought a 68! And, as the guy I bought if from said, "I just love the ass end of this car."
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Mar 22, 2006
#83
  • Mar 22, 2006
  • #83
Having owned or driven all "eras", I would stick with my favorite = 1967 coupe-fastback-shelby.

Keeps the original Mustang appearance with a little more aggressive look. Also contains improvements from the original falcon/mustang frame.

Although, I do like my 1966 fastback and I would never turndown a 1969 Mach I. By the way, after driving a 1969 Mach I and 1972 Mach I, how do you guys see out of those things (blind spots are enormous).
 
6

69boss429

New Member
Jul 22, 2005
4
0
0
Mar 22, 2006
#84
  • Mar 22, 2006
  • #84
Dan H said:
71-73

Boss 351s & 429CJs eat boss9s for lunch.

nuff said.
Click to expand...
Perhaps we should go to lunch www.1969boss429.com
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Mar 22, 2006
#85
  • Mar 22, 2006
  • #85
69boss429 said:
Perhaps we should go to lunch www.1969boss429.com
Click to expand...
!!

Oooooh Ooooooh pick me, pick me!!!!!!!! He doesn't like your car, so you should take me to lunch instead, I am located in Sandy, Utah when's a good time for you to come up?
 
D

Dan H

New Member
Feb 21, 2006
10
0
0
Seattle
Mar 22, 2006
#86
  • Mar 22, 2006
  • #86
I never said I didn't like his car. Actually it is one of my favorite cars ever produced. It's a 69 too (I like the Mauder in garage also, almost a worthy replacement for the SHO).

I just just like Boss 351s better...

The fact is the Boss 351 was the fastest stock gen 1 Mustang, many people consider them more comfortable and better handling than earlier stangs, & I think they are better & more agressive looking.
 
D

Dan H

New Member
Feb 21, 2006
10
0
0
Seattle
Mar 22, 2006
#87
  • Mar 22, 2006
  • #87
Dan H said:
Boss 351s & 429CJs eat boss9s for lunch.
Click to expand...

4MuscleMachines said:
So true, that is a fact Dan.
Click to expand...

69boss429 said:
Perhaps we should go to lunch www.1969boss429.com
Click to expand...

Hey 4MuscleMachines, What should we do about this?

Is he talking pink slips here?

My previous statement can be backed up by published works of non-fiction..
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
Mar 22, 2006
#88
  • Mar 22, 2006
  • #88
If we do lunch with him, we'll need to pick him up since our 351 Boss cars would have already eaten his early for breakfast!
 
6

69boss429

New Member
Jul 22, 2005
4
0
0
Mar 22, 2006
#89
  • Mar 22, 2006
  • #89
4MuscleMachines said:
If we do lunch with him, we'll need to pick him up since our 351 Boss cars would have already eaten his early for breakfast!
Click to expand...
Well, I truthfully have not made a 1/4 mi pass with the upgrades,but when I bought it in 1969 I put on headers,some distributor work,and borrowed some slicks and ran a 12.48 at 116 mph.The engine now dynos at 600 hp so if I can get it to hook up I'm thinking 10's. What do you think!! Personally,I like the Boss 351's but you could have also gotten a 429SCJ in 1971.There is still no substitute for cubic inches! Its unfortunate that Ford had to detune all the really good engines.If they had offered a dual quad option in 1969 nothing would have gotten by a stock Boss 429. Just my 2 cents ( And you should here this thing sing at 7000 rpm)
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
Mar 23, 2006
#90
  • Mar 23, 2006
  • #90
Just having some fun 69Boss429, I truly like your car...you have to always respect a 429 whether stock or modified, respect it not only performance wise but moreso for its heritage and $$. Mine traps in the high 11's @ typically 118's on an old set of drag radials.
 
6

69boss429

New Member
Jul 22, 2005
4
0
0
Mar 23, 2006
#91
  • Mar 23, 2006
  • #91
4MuscleMachines said:
Just having some fun 69Boss429, I truly like your car...you have to always respect a 429 whether stock or modified, respect it not only performance wise but moreso for its heritage and $$. Mine traps in the high 11's @ typically 118's on an old set of drag radials.
Click to expand...
No prob!! I like them all,but I am out of garage space.I consider myself fortunate to have been able to buy the Boss new and hang onto it.In 1969 there were muscle cars everywhere and we raced all the time.The Boss held its own back in the day and it was a lot of fun.Today I wouldn't dare street race it today,but I might bolt on a set of traction masters and some drag radials just to get it into the 10's for bragging rights .
 
D

Dan H

New Member
Feb 21, 2006
10
0
0
Seattle
Mar 23, 2006
#92
  • Mar 23, 2006
  • #92
69boss429 said:
Personally,I like the Boss 351's but you could have also gotten a 429SCJ in 1971.There is still no substitute for cubic inches! Its unfortunate that Ford had to detune all the really good engines.If they had offered a dual quad option in 1969 nothing would have gotten by a stock Boss 429. Just my 2 cents ( And you should here this thing sing at 7000 rpm)
Click to expand...

A 429 SCJ was next on my list, and then the muscle car market took off and priced me out of a muscle car collection (I'm glad I bought the boss first!) It is pretty well known however that the Boss351 was a bit quicker on the street than the 429CJ/SCJ back in the day. It really is a shame that they undercarbed the Boss9, I agree that a dual quad would have been devastating. I would love to see dual quads on the Boss 351, and 429 SCJ also!
 
D

Dan H

New Member
Feb 21, 2006
10
0
0
Seattle
Mar 24, 2006
#93
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • #93
I also think it would have been cool to see a 69 or 70 Boss 351!

Maybe I should build one...
 
J

john_doe_000

New Member
Mar 20, 2006
0
0
0
Mar 24, 2006
#94
  • Mar 24, 2006
  • #94
"big body" lover #6!!!
1973 Mustang fastback baby! 4 speed! Yeah!
 
6

67GTFB

Member
Nov 29, 1999
122
4
19
Mar 25, 2006
#95
  • Mar 25, 2006
  • #95
for me it's always been the '67 becasue of Bullitt and it was my first car, purchased for $1750 senior year in college (1970) .... I'm the third owner and I still own it .... but every Mustang has its place and purpose and meaning to the owner ....
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Progress Thread Today in the shed........
  • Don7Up
  • May 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
962
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Today at 7:05 AM
Don7Up
D
T5 identification
  • 3054tony
  • May 16, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
460
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
AeroCoupe
L
Can anyone tell me what this is hanging under my car?
  • Luckysgirl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
182
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
Noobz347
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
G
Octane on the 5.0 Coyote
  • gray owl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
7
Views
249
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?