• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

when it comes to Automatics...

  • Thread starter Thread starter shallowreef
  • Start date Start date Mar 5, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

shallowreef

New Member
Nov 3, 2005
0
1
0
illinois
Mar 5, 2008
#1
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #1
Is it better to use a 4.10s or 3.73s? My friends and i were talking about this over the weekend as i am planing to do a bigger rear gear this spring and i was unsure what to go with. I thought i remembered that with autos your better off to go 4.10 but friends though that with sticks your better to go with a 4.10.

Either way i am putting ina rear gear but was just curious if one suits me better than the other.

Also are there any downsides to rear gears? Anyone have or hear of anyhting bad happening afterwards? Does anything need to be beefed up to compensate for teh gear?

Thanks
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Mar 5, 2008
#2
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #2
shallowreef said:
Is it better to use a 4.10s or 3.73s? My friends and i were talking about this over the weekend as i am planing to do a bigger rear gear this spring and i was unsure what to go with. I thought i remembered that with autos your better off to go 4.10 but friends though that with sticks your better to go with a 4.10.

Either way i am putting ina rear gear but was just curious if one suits me better than the other.

Also are there any downsides to rear gears? Anyone have or hear of anyhting bad happening afterwards? Does anything need to be beefed up to compensate for teh gear?

Thanks
Click to expand...

I have 3.73s in my auto and love them. Quick video for you http://s35.photobucket.com/albums/d154/scupking/?action=view&current=Movie_0002.flv
One thing alot of people say they run out of gear with 4.10s at the track. Also if you ever get a S/C 4.10s will be a little much.
 

LB0193

Member
Dec 6, 2005
171
0
16
IL
Mar 5, 2008
#3
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #3
4.10 dont look back
 

LB0193

Member
Dec 6, 2005
171
0
16
IL
Mar 5, 2008
#4
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #4
dont fear the gear
 

shallowreef

New Member
Nov 3, 2005
0
1
0
illinois
Mar 5, 2008
#5
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #5
If i get the cash to supercharge the car i'll spend the extra money to put in a smaller gear.

4.10s here i come.
 
B

bakos24

I find there is nothing better than a tasty wiener
Nov 29, 1999
4,461
87
134
NE, OH
Mar 5, 2008
#6
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #6
shallowreef said:
If i get the cash to supercharge the car i'll spend the extra money to put in a smaller gear.

4.10s here i come.
Click to expand...

. Good choice. I love my 4.10s even though mine is 5spd
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Mar 5, 2008
#7
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #7
I had 4.10s in my car until the middle of last year. There awesome for and auto even if you get a blower, well a centri blower at least. Until you really start making some serious power and trapping 115-120 you don’t have to worry about running out of gear.

The only way I would say to avoid them is if you do a lot of driving at 70-75mph that is the only place they will hurt you.

I would recommend 4.10s 100%.
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Mar 5, 2008
#8
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #8
04YELLOWGT said:
I had 4.10s in my car until the middle of last year. There awesome for and auto even if you get a blower, well a centri blower at least. Until you really start making some serious power and trapping 115-120 you don’t have to worry about running out of gear.

The only way I would say to avoid them is if you do a lot of driving at 70-75mph that is the only place they will hurt you.

I would recommend 4.10s 100%.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't think it would hurt that much. I mean with 3.73s I'm just a tick under 3k at 80mph. I'm guessing 4.10s will add another 200rpms? I get around 230 miles out of a tank and that’s half highway and half around town with lots of WOT runs. I wouldn't think 4.10s would be that much of a difference in gas mileage. One thing that is a must is getting a transmission cooler.
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Mar 5, 2008
#9
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #9
scupking said:
I wouldn't think it would hurt that much. I mean with 3.73s I'm just a tick under 3k at 80mph. I'm guessing 4.10s will add another 200rpms? I get around 230 miles out of a tank and that’s half highway and half around town with lots of WOT runs. I wouldn't think 4.10s would be that much of a difference in gas mileage. One thing that is a must is getting a transmission cooler.
Click to expand...

Crusing at 3k at 75 isn't exactly a fun trip. LOL My exhaust is screaming and I wouldn't think its real good on the motor either.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Mar 5, 2008
#10
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #10
04YELLOWGT said:
Crusing at 3k at 75 isn't exactly a fun trip. LOL My exhaust is screaming and I wouldn't think its real good on the motor either.
Click to expand...

But I have 3.73's with a Pypes o/r X and Dronemasters to annoy me on the freeway
 

shallowreef

New Member
Nov 3, 2005
0
1
0
illinois
Mar 5, 2008
#11
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #11
See now that raises a question in my mind because i do tend to do some 75 mph highway driving from time to time. Is it just bad because of gas milage or is it bad engine wise?

If i see 200 miles on a tank with my car its a lot. I ususally only see around 160 to 170.
 
B

bakos24

I find there is nothing better than a tasty wiener
Nov 29, 1999
4,461
87
134
NE, OH
Mar 5, 2008
#12
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #12
Your gas mileage shouldn't change at all. Mine has not with my 4.10s. On the highway you will be at higher RPMs which will cause your exhaust to be louder so it depends if you want to hear your exhaust at high RPMs or not.
 
B

bakos24

I find there is nothing better than a tasty wiener
Nov 29, 1999
4,461
87
134
NE, OH
Mar 5, 2008
#13
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #13
dp
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Mar 5, 2008
#14
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #14
Your right foot is what affects your gas mileage, not the gears
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Mar 5, 2008
#15
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #15
shallowreef said:
See now that raises a question in my mind because i do tend to do some 75 mph highway driving from time to time. Is it just bad because of gas milage or is it bad engine wise?

If i see 200 miles on a tank with my car its a lot. I ususally only see around 160 to 170.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say it’s bad on the engine. At 80mph at around 3,100rpm you still have 3,150 more RPMs to get to the rev limiter. The only issue you will have is that your exhaust will be louder. Getting 160-170 miles to a tank is very low; you should be around 210-240.
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Mar 5, 2008
#16
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #16
shallowreef said:
See now that raises a question in my mind because i do tend to do some 75 mph highway driving from time to time. Is it just bad because of gas milage or is it bad engine wise?

If i see 200 miles on a tank with my car its a lot. I ususally only see around 160 to 170.
Click to expand...

If you’re not driving it daily I don't think you’d have a problem. I only hit those speeds when I was going to and from the tracks (1-2 times a month) so it didn't bother me that much. Now if I was commuting every day then I think Id go with 3.73s.

scupking said:
I wouldn't say it’s bad on the engine. At 80mph at around 3,100rpm you still have 3,150 more RPMs to get to the rev limiter. The only issue you will have is that your exhaust will be louder. Getting 160-170 miles to a tank is very low; you should be around 210-240.
Click to expand...

Just because your not hitting the rev limiter doesn’t mean its ok to do. I’m not saying its bad for sure but I can’t imagine cruising at 3k+ for a long period of time is good thing to do to motor.
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,391
3,538
233
Mar 5, 2008
#17
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #17
There shouldnt be much difference in mileage but the drone of a freeflowing exhaust at 3k will numb you to the core. I swear my eyes vibrate when I do around a hundred and at 3k the exhaust note humm is defening.
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Mar 5, 2008
#18
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #18
LaserSVT said:
There shouldnt be much difference in mileage but the drone of a freeflowing exhaust at 3k will numb you to the core. I swear my eyes vibrate when I do around a hundred and at 3k the exhaust note humm is defening.
Click to expand...

I agree, I cruise at 75-80 and it is very loud, gets annoying but that’s the speed most people go at around here on the highway. Cruising at 70 is perfect; If I had 4.10s 70 would be kind of annoying. One thing that helps is to crack the window open a little then the sound isn't as bad.
 

joshheat25

Member
Nov 8, 2004
871
0
16
Delaware
Mar 5, 2008
#19
  • Mar 5, 2008
  • #19
I have 4.10's in my auto. The gears are awesome. As far as highway drone goes, I have a drone cruising at 60-65 above that it's gone! and Quiter... as far as MPG goes I get around 20 just highway cruising at 70-75 and 17-18 city/hwy.
Automatics have a lower top gear of .70 compared to the sticks .68 so that does make a little difference in hwy cruising rpm.

If your going to get a blower in the future go with 3.73's and save yourself the $$
 
S

ShapeShifter

Member
Jun 5, 2006
85
0
7
Mar 6, 2008
#20
  • Mar 6, 2008
  • #20
4.10's in my auto, 65mph=2500rpm...i have no exhaust drone, must be the longtube headers....when i had stock manifolds it was unbearable.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rear diff rebuild opinions
  • MrPerfect2
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
210
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2025
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
393
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 3, 2026
squeak93
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
745
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Yesterday at 1:31 AM
X-cam34
X
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
221
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?