• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

which heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter wlink1
  • Start date Start date Oct 3, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

wlink1

Banned
Apr 12, 2007
69
0
0
Winston Salem
Oct 3, 2007
#1
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #1
Fully ported E7 heads that ran 12.9x, said the heads took him from 13.5x to the 12.9x for $225

Or

Stock GT40P stock need hot taking probably will need surfaced and valve job. $220 the guy may take less

The E7 guy said him and his brother basically had the same car and his car with the E7 would pull his brothers on topend everytime.

My overall goal is 12's.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 3, 2007
#2
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #2
Tough choice...

Both are iron heads...

I highly doubt that the ported E7's gained him the equivalent of 60hp using the old formula, 10hp per tenth.

With no other changes, hmm....

Gt40P's require a special header, or doing some 'customizing' to your #6 spark plug and boots if I recall.

If on a budget, go with the ported E7's in my opinion.
 

wlink1

Banned
Apr 12, 2007
69
0
0
Winston Salem
Oct 3, 2007
#3
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #3
5spd GT said:
Tough choice...

Both are iron heads...

I highly doubt that the ported E7's gained him the equivalent of 60hp using the old formula, 10hp per tenth.

With no other changes, hmm....

Gt40P's require a special header, or doing some 'customizing' to your #6 spark plug and boots if I recall.

If on a budget, go with the ported E7's in my opinion.
Click to expand...

Thjat was my thought's I had read that some people had to modify or tun a diff. header on the p's but then noticed some said they just went with a 90 degree boot on those heads so it is a tough decision, I may go with the E7 b/c I am looking at another $200 to get the P's usable
 

wlink1

Banned
Apr 12, 2007
69
0
0
Winston Salem
Oct 3, 2007
#4
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #4
Now I am really stuck on which set??

GT40P's down to $175 bucks, 88,000 miles will need hottanking and I am guessing surfaced and possible valve grind.

Any suggestions
 

earleys94gt

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
1,223
16
49
Ashley, Ohio
Oct 3, 2007
#5
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #5
If the E7's are ready to go on without hot tanking and resurfacing, go with those.
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Oct 3, 2007
#6
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #6
I say buy 'em both and resell the GT40p heads, use what you make to pay for gaskets etc to install the E7's.

Wes
 

wlink1

Banned
Apr 12, 2007
69
0
0
Winston Salem
Oct 3, 2007
#7
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #7
trying to see what kind of market for the P heads in NC as there is a set selling on ebay for $150 just don't want to spend $175 on the p's as well and not be able to sell them.

Thanks for all the help, going to pick up the ported E7 tomorrow now just gotta find the cam.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 3, 2007
#8
  • Oct 3, 2007
  • #8
5spd GT said:
Tough choice...

I highly doubt that the ported E7's gained him the equivalent of 60hp using the old formula, 10hp per tenth.
Click to expand...

I agree with David

Heck Fire ... I Ain't Skered

I'll just say it flat out right

You ain't gonna get 60 horses from grinding around on an old pair of E7's

I'd not guarantee you would find 60 horses from Aluminum heads :Word:

Over the years, on more than one occasion, I've seen data that shows
properly ported E7's will flow more than a set of GT40's

Of course ... if you compare ported E7's & ported GT40's ... thats different

Those 88K 40p's most likely have springs that are on their last legs I'd bet

Sounds like the E7's are the better value to me between the two options

Good Luck to ya!

Grady
 

wlink1

Banned
Apr 12, 2007
69
0
0
Winston Salem
Oct 4, 2007
#9
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #9
Yeah seemed a little crazy for 60hp from just heads, b/c the thumper heads are only 30hp @ 5000RPM. The guy I am buying them from ran this setup for his 12.9x. If I get in the 13.xx I will be happy for now.

ported E7 89 vert 1.6rr, e cam, 3.73, drag radials, cobra intake, full exhaust
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
Oct 4, 2007
#10
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #10
wlink i live in wilmington nc and would be interested in what ever heads you dont use. let me know i would be interested in the p's or the ported e7's.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 4, 2007
#11
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #11
Yeah, after looking into it a bit more, I have to say a 60 horsepower claim/time loss, is a bit on the silly side I think even AFR only says they claimed 41hp with just the headswap alone. Plus you lose 30-40 lbs on top of that...

I like the E7 idea myself out of those two options anyways...
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 4, 2007
#12
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #12
5spd GT said:
Yeah, after looking into it a bit more, I have to say a 60 horsepower claim/time loss, is a bit on the silly side I think even AFR only says they claimed 41hp with just the headswap alone. Plus you lose 30-40 lbs on top of that...

I like the E7 idea myself out of those two options anyways...
Click to expand...

Yes David

I will say the 10hp gain per 1/10 in et reduction that has been around for
as long as I can remember is a good rule of thumb

Then again

The rule of thumb we speak here is flywheel hp
so
60 fwhp x .85 = 51 rwhp

We both picked up on the fact of one or the other

More was done than a head swap
or
The amount of et reduction was embellished ... just a tiny bit

Grady
 

wlink1

Banned
Apr 12, 2007
69
0
0
Winston Salem
Oct 4, 2007
#13
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #13
fastgtfairlane said:
wlink i live in wilmington nc and would be interested in what ever heads you dont use. let me know i would be interested in the p's or the ported e7's.
Click to expand...

both sets of heads are in Maryland, just luckily my brother is stationed there, if you are still interested I could send the link. Not sure about shipping though.
 
S

Sirone

New Member
Nov 12, 2006
63
0
0
Oct 4, 2007
#14
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #14
GT40p's.
 

wlink1

Banned
Apr 12, 2007
69
0
0
Winston Salem
Oct 4, 2007
#15
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #15
Sirone said:
GT40p's.
Click to expand...

Yeah I am going to buy the E7
 

wlink1

Banned
Apr 12, 2007
69
0
0
Winston Salem
Oct 4, 2007
#16
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #16
how would this cam run with My projected setup? 210 at Advance

Powermax Hydraulic Camshaft/Lifter Kit:
RPM 1800-5400
Adv. Dur. 272 Int./284 Exh.
Valve Lift .484 Int./.512 Exh.
Lobe 112 Deg.
Includes Cam; Lifter; Shim Kit; Adjusting Nuts
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Oct 4, 2007
#17
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #17
wlink1 said:
Fully ported E7 heads that ran 12.9x, said the heads took him from 13.5x to the 12.9x for $225

Or

Stock GT40P stock need hot taking probably will need surfaced and valve job. $220 the guy may take less
Click to expand...

Go with the ported E7's, especially if they don't need resurfacing or a valve job.
Like the others, I find it hard to believe that the seller gained 0.6sec from the ported heads. It takes a 15% increase in HP to produce such a gain and that would be 37rwhp on a 250rwhp engine. Realistically I think the HP and ET gains from ported E7's are about half of the aforementioned numbers i.e. ~20rwhp and 0.3sec. Still a useful gain and great value at just $11 per HP.
 

wlink1

Banned
Apr 12, 2007
69
0
0
Winston Salem
Oct 4, 2007
#18
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #18
yeah they guy I am getting them from can't find the flow sheet but it was done professionally fully port and polish with 5 degree valve grind
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 4, 2007
#19
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #19
See

Thats the deal about doing OEM combo parts

If you decide to move to after market stuff later
and
Lets be honest ... we all want more power :Word:

How big of a hit are you gonna take when you try to move them
for the cash to do the new combo

To my way of thinking ... at 225 bucks

You are not gonna take a hit or if you do ... its just a small one

You are only out a bunch of work
and
I give myself excellent labor rates

Grady
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 4, 2007
#20
  • Oct 4, 2007
  • #20
wlink1 said:
how would this cam run with My projected setup? 210 at Advance

Powermax Hydraulic Camshaft/Lifter Kit:
RPM 1800-5400
Adv. Dur. 272 Int./284 Exh.
Valve Lift .484 Int./.512 Exh.
Lobe 112 Deg.
Includes Cam; Lifter; Shim Kit; Adjusting Nuts
Click to expand...

Now I think you are getting somewhere

That cam matches better with the potential powerband you will have and the E7 style casting..

I really like the trickflow stage 1 for a budget camshaft, but I think with that cam, you are getting in the ball-park.

You may not NEED a tune, but a tune would be nice to iron out some idle and low rpm kinks that you may encounter.

Something you may want to consider, since you are going with ported E7's, more than likely, contact Thumper who knows his E7's. He has a couple older style camshafts like the one you mentioned that he likes to recommend, but I would hate to speak on their idle quality with the ECU of the sn-95 cars. Although, I know it can be done

I know you realize there are better camshafts out there like from the custom cam gurus...but for a budget, your getting there
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
675
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
576
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Stand alone vs chip tune (for noob)
  • nicholase
  • Jan 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2025
Noobz347
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
818
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?