• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Which is the smart way? Rebuild or crate shortblock?

  • Thread starter Thread starter '66 coupe
  • Start date Start date Jan 22, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Jan 26, 2006
#21
  • Jan 26, 2006
  • #21
milner351 said:
No one loves your car as much as you do, and no one will spend the time and attention to detail on your engine that you will.
Click to expand...


Preach on, Brother Milner!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 26, 2006
#22
  • Jan 26, 2006
  • #22
[QUOTE='66 coupe]My roommate actually found a '96 at one yard the bodyshop he works at buys stuff from. It was $400 but had high miles, so for what I want to do, I'm gonna pass. Hopefully I can find something with low miles.[/QUOTE]
What do you call "high miles" ? The 86 up roller 5.0's are good for nearly 200K miles. In one with 80,000+miles, you can pull the oilpan and replace the rod bearings ( provided the old ones and the crank aren't scored oor scratched) to extend the usefull life. The rings and bore last a long time since Ford switched to low tension rings. I'd also replace the oilpump too while there, along with the pump driveshaft and the front & rear seal. This info applies to motors that haven't been opened up or left to the elements since their retirement.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Jan 26, 2006
#23
  • Jan 26, 2006
  • #23
A engine builder here on the forum named Rick91GT has an excelent rep here in the 5.0 forums. Here's his website http://www.rnhperformance.net/ I would go through him before going with a crate motor especially if you want a stroker to move that heavy 69 shell around. From what people have said his prices are more than reasonable and his workmanship fantastic.
Kevin
 
E

electricgreen

Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,140
0
36
Western NY
Mar 28, 2006
#24
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #24
[QUOTE='66 coupe]The other option is going with a Ford Racing 302 roller shortblock(M-6009-B50) for around $1350.

[/QUOTE]

Where did you come arcoss that number/price? My hubby is driving himself (and now me)to distraction looking for Ford shortblocks less than @$3,000 (stroker motors)
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Mar 28, 2006
#25
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #25
I can give you my experience on the build side, I bought a 91 Mustang GT motor w/ less than 40K on it. When I pulled it apart, everything looked very clean, bearings did not even look like they had been in the car, the Pistons were nearly carbon free, and the cylinders looked like they were fresh from the factory, After selling off all the top end stuff and buying all new, with new oil pump, pan, and all the little stuff, I could have bought the Ford Racing 340 hp long block for about $400 less, and that is with me doing all the work myself.

Sometimes I feel like I should have bought the crate motor, which is brand new everything, but there is the satisfaction factor... I did it myself! That is huge in my book. Just some thoughts for you...
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 28, 2006
#26
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #26
If the internals looked that good, I'd have just reringed it and installed new rods and mains. Total cost would have been less than $500.
 

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Mar 28, 2006
#27
  • Mar 28, 2006
  • #27
I am finding out right now, first hand, the advantages and disadvantages of doing a performance rebuild with a local reputable machine shop. If I had to start all over, it would be a performance crate motor hands down, no questions asked. With the right crate motor, you get way more value!
 
E

electricgreen

Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,140
0
36
Western NY
Mar 29, 2006
#28
  • Mar 29, 2006
  • #28
Ok, the Ford Performance Crate motors all have GT-40 heads. Anyone know of a manifold that would work with these? Or should we go with a shortblock and use our heads?
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Mar 29, 2006
#29
  • Mar 29, 2006
  • #29
electricgreen said:
Where did you come arcoss that number/price? My hubby is driving himself (and now me)to distraction looking for Ford shortblocks less than @$3,000 (stroker motors)
Click to expand...

I worked at a performance shop in Orlando for a couple week. I think that's the retail price. Jeg's has $1300.
That's a hyper short block. Since it's a 302 the price is considerably cheaper. You're going to find the 347's are around $3000 for a forged shortblock, around $2500 for a hyper.
 
T

THX 138

Member
Oct 7, 2004
375
0
16
Los Angeles
Mar 29, 2006
#30
  • Mar 29, 2006
  • #30
I vote for not rebuilding. I got a '69 302 block and its corroded from the inside out exposing the casting porosity and now leaks.
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Mar 29, 2006
#31
  • Mar 29, 2006
  • #31
electricgreen said:
Ok, the Ford Performance Crate motors all have GT-40 heads. Anyone know of a manifold that would work with these? Or should we go with a shortblock and use our heads?
Click to expand...

The stock 2 bbl intake from my '69 302 matches the GT40P heads on the Mountaineer engine I have. So shouldn't most 302 manifolds work?

While I'm on the subject of parts fitment, what all will I need to retrofit the Gt40P for a carb'd setup in my '66?
So far I have:
-Intake manifold & carb.
-timing cover and waterpump
-headers - Anyone know of good headers for GT40P heads in a classic? I've heard HiPo manifolds work, but that's like a last resort.
-Distributor - I've heard '85 GT. Anything better?
-Oiling system - Pan, Front sump, plug original dipstick.

I also want to add an E303 cam and dual roller timing chain.

Am I missing anything?
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Mar 29, 2006
#32
  • Mar 29, 2006
  • #32
Forgot balancer and flexplate, right?
 
E

electricgreen

Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,140
0
36
Western NY
Mar 29, 2006
#33
  • Mar 29, 2006
  • #33
[QUOTE='66 coupe]The stock 2 bbl intake from my '69 302 matches the GT40P heads on the Mountaineer engine I have. So shouldn't most 302 manifolds work?

While I'm on the subject of parts fitment, what all will I need to retrofit the Gt40P for a carb'd setup in my '66?
So far I have:
-Intake manifold & carb.
-timing cover and waterpump
-headers - Anyone know of good headers for GT40P heads in a classic? I've heard HiPo manifolds work, but that's like a last resort.
-Distributor - I've heard '85 GT. Anything better?
-Oiling system - Pan, Front sump, plug original dipstick.

I also want to add an E303 cam and dual roller timing chain.

Am I missing anything?[/QUOTE]

Huh, beats me, I am 100% clueless about the gt-40 heads, I just figured they would be different somehow.

Ugh, headers. Hadn't thought about that yet!

I need a "for dummies" book
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Mar 29, 2006
#34
  • Mar 29, 2006
  • #34
electricgreen said:
Huh, beats me, I am 100% clueless about the gt-40 heads, I just figured they would be different somehow.

Ugh, headers. Hadn't thought about that yet!

I need a "for dummies" book
Click to expand...

GT40, you'll be okay on headers.
GT40P is where you need special ones to clear the sparkplugs.
 

Stangninjak

Member
Apr 16, 2004
324
2
19
Mar 30, 2006
#35
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #35
Heh I just went thru all of this myself. My 69 block 351 went kaboom on I95. Now when I tore everything apart, I had very fine metal in the oil pan. After talking to my local machine shops, (Most were shady at best) I decided just to get a longblock and use parts from my old engine, and buy new what I wanted to upgrade.

I bought a block from faster5.0, and it came with a 12month warranty. Was put together very good with quality parts, and they painted it yellow for me Had the TFW heads and cam installed, I bought a stealth, used my oil pan and pickup, bought new vavle covers, and upgraded the carb from a 1406 eddy to a 670 SA holley. Heh all of the parts are in my sig Anyway long story short, I came out cheaper. I have a new engine, with warranty, and it still was under 4k with all the upgrades. I will be dynoing probaly this weekend or next, so I will see how it goes.

So buy a new block or rebuild ? I guess it depends on how your local machine shops are. I am quite happy with the results the way I went.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 30, 2006
#36
  • Mar 30, 2006
  • #36
Any Windsor type intake (with the excetion of the bastard 1980's 255cid V8) will bolt up to any GT40 series heads. A minor port matching will in most cases be all that's needed to fix any slight mismatch encountered.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
654
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Help with Engine Build
  • 93gtmustang
  • Nov 13, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
733
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2024
AeroCoupe
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
602
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?