• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

WHich motor lighter....Stock 302 or 4.6L DOHC??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustang5L5
  • Start date Start date Apr 10, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Apr 11, 2006
#21
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #21
Speeds8erM-1 said:
Never let the 5.0 guys speak out on modular stuff I guess LOL! So much confusion!

96-01 Cobra = aluminum blocked
03-04 Cobra = iron blocked

see how simple that was? venture out of the 5.0 cave for a little while, it wont hurt, I promise.
Click to expand...


I posted it in the 4.6 forum too....not very good response
 
S

Speeds8erM-1

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2000
1,240
0
36
Pensacola Florida
Apr 11, 2006
#22
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #22
Mustang5L5 said:
I posted it in the 4.6 forum too....not very good response
Click to expand...

Well damn, those slackers dropped the ball.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 11, 2006
#23
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #23
I think y'all covered the weight part...my guess is a 4v motor is heavier because of the heads. Anyways, since '03 Cobra motors are still so expenseive....i'd suggest buying a built 4v block, like you'd do for a 302, and then look into ******ing a used Eaton off someone who just got a KB. You might end up with a stronger short block than stock and save some money vs. a new production setup.


And by the way...i think the censorship is getting a bit out of hand...you can't say s n a t c h?

Main Entry: 1******
Pronunciation: 'snach
Function: verb
Etymology: Middle English snacchen to give a sudden snap, seize; akin to Middle Dutch snacken to snap at
intransitive senses : to attempt to seize something suddenly
transitive senses : to take or grasp abruptly or hastily; also : to seize or grab suddenly without permission, ceremony, or right
synonym see TAKE
- ******·er noun


Don't get me started on the slang term, i'm not 11 years old. But c'mon, i wasn't even thinking along those lines.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 11, 2006
#24
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #24
All iron 302 would mean, iron heads. That is 50lbs a piece. 4v heads are 70lbs a piece. 40lb difference total.

I hope some don't get the bulkiness confused with the "feeling" of weight. I'm sure it weighs more, but not condiserably more...if at all. Surely someone has the dry weight of the engines somewhere...
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Apr 11, 2006
#25
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #25
Well, the 4V engine would be sans A/C, not like that makes much of a difference. I would need to retain P/S however as i will need it for the hydroboosted brakes. Don't really have much of an option with this as the vacuum booster would hit the valve cover.

If i stuck with a 302, it would be sans A/C and converted to manual steering.

I'm just wondering if i were to slip a 4V in would i turn the car into a nose-heavy pig? I really wanted to try to shave some weight off the nose with AL heads (302 head) a fiberglass hood and ditching the P/S system.

I'd love to do the 4V swap as i want a challenge, but i don't want to end up adding 300 pounds to the nose and creating a car that can't take a turn any more
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 11, 2006
#26
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #26
Mustang5L5 said:
Well, the 4V engine would be sans A/C, not like that makes much of a difference. I would need to retain P/S however as i will need it for the hydroboosted brakes. Don't really have much of an option with this as the vacuum booster would hit the valve cover.

If i stuck with a 302, it would be sans A/C and converted to manual steering.

I'm just wondering if i were to slip a 4V in would i turn the car into a nose-heavy pig? I really wanted to try to shave some weight off the nose with AL heads (302 head) a fiberglass hood and ditching the P/S system.

I'd love to do the 4V swap as i want a challenge, but i don't want to end up adding 300 pounds to the nose and creating a car that can't take a turn any more
Click to expand...


Just food for thought....a tubular K member and A arms and a nice coilover setup can probably make up for whatever weight the engine might add.
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Apr 11, 2006
#27
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #27
4 cams wieght more than 1
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Apr 11, 2006
#28
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #28
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Just food for thought....a tubular K member and A arms and a nice coilover setup can probably make up for whatever weight the engine might add.
Click to expand...


True, but i was planning that anyway with the original 5.0...plus perhaps a CF hood.

Plus i just remembered that a t-45 or a t-3650 would weigh slightly more than a t-5 so there's a slight gain right there.


I'm just starting to wonder if an aluminum headed 302 sans P/S , A/C and smog with a k-member, a-arms and such and a t-5 would be more practical and result in a lighter car.

Then again, a 4V fox is just cool.

decisions decisions.


Does anyone make a tubular k-member that can run BOTH a 5.0 and a 4.6??? that way i can buy it and install and not have to worry about what i decide on
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Apr 11, 2006
#29
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #29
Mustang5L5 said:
I'd love to do the 4V swap as i want a challenge, but i don't want to end up adding 300 pounds to the nose and creating a car that can't take a turn any more
Click to expand...
You may have already stated it, but what is your goal? DD, corner carver, or dragster?

The 4V will put an extra 140 pounds (each head) up higher (center of gravity) than the OHV 302 engine.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Apr 11, 2006
#30
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #30
4u2nv said:
You may have already stated it, but what is your goal? DD, corner carver, or dragster?
Click to expand...

Ideally, an all around car, but i would lean more on turning and braking ability vs all out straight line speed.

Still with that said, i won't be entering it into any sort of competitive racing. Maybe a drag pass here and there, an autocross competition and maybe so laps on a road course for fun.


However, i want something to make my car really stand out.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
609
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
924
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
M
Gifted a Junk 1976 Mustang II with plans for a radical conversion!
  • MXGerry
  • Apr 29, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 12, 2026
MXGerry
M
Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?