• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

which one?

  • Thread starter Thread starter all4ford
  • Start date Start date Mar 16, 2008
A

all4ford

New Member
Mar 23, 2006
3
0
0
Mar 16, 2008
#1
  • Mar 16, 2008
  • #1
Im currently building a 408 for my car with a solid roller, dart heads, and a victor 5.8 intake and i am looking for tuning software that i will surely need once its done. The closest place for me to get a tune is about 150 miles and after fuel and the cost of the tune i could have bought my own software already and id just rather do it myself anyway. im just wanting to get some opinions on what kind of tuning device you think would be the best for my application...i was looking at a tweecer because it is cheaper but i like that the pms comes with its own handheld deal that way i dont need a laptop. i havent really heard anything about any other companies but would love to hear some opinions on what you guys use...does one kind do more than another or is one kind more precise or what? sorry for the long post
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 16, 2008
#2
  • Mar 16, 2008
  • #2
I'll just mention the main thing as I see it as this subject has been
hashed over and over in the past few years.

Many peeps have had good results with PMS or Tweecer

If you really get into self tuning, it is most likely you will want to have the
ability to gather data for various conditions and analyze it later

That is where the laptop is the obvious winner considering the options
it can give you

Again ... both methods allow you to datalog ... if you desire

I have always had the option of datalogging
and
I've found it to be a ... must have ... kinda thing myself :Word:

If you want a lot of Tweecer details geared toward a Noobie and basic
info ... search this forum and the 94-95 Tech forum with my screen name.
Go back like 2 to 3 years as I was way more active back then.

There is a bit of basic Tweecer stuff on my site (see sig)

Look at the excellent site Wes (Stanger007) created which is
the Wiki site

Good Luck!!!

Grady
 
A

all4ford

New Member
Mar 23, 2006
3
0
0
Mar 17, 2008
#3
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #3
thanks alot for the info...i was really just wondering weather the pms did more just because it costs more but i guess thats just because the handheld thing right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
515
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Tuning help! - HEGO 2 @ 64 volts!!!
  • VenomousISA
  • Feb 20, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
236
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 26, 2025
VenomousISA
S
Looking for input on Motor choice
  • stevedjarrell
  • May 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 15, 2025
Noobz347
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
466
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
371
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 5, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?