• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

which pipe for a stock car?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95.0Stang
  • Start date Start date Aug 4, 2009
9

95.0Stang

Member
Feb 20, 2003
538
1
18
Kansas
Aug 4, 2009
#1
  • Aug 4, 2009
  • #1
I am getting ready to put a Magnaflow Cat-back on my 2003 GT, the car is bone stock in the power area. I was wondering which pipe would be the most beneficial for me?

I have heard the X-pipe frees up more power as the scavenging effect of the exhaust helps with back pressure. Is this significant enough to choose the X over the H?

Which pipe will give a smoother sound at idle and around town driving? One of my friends said the Hpipe was going to be very raspy with the Magnaflows.

Any advice is appreciated, I am listening to clips on youtube, but I dont think they are super reliable since the sound changes with camera, and other mods slightly.
 
R

Rife96GTconv

Member
Mar 1, 2009
73
2
9
Sumter, SC
Aug 4, 2009
#2
  • Aug 4, 2009
  • #2
I have a 96 GT with a magnaflow cat back (not magnapacks) and a VRS o/r x-pipe. I am very satisfied with the sound. The x-pipes are typically more raspy, but paired with the regular magnaflow it really smooths out the sound. I've heard that an h-pipe sounds good with the magnaflow as well. Just my .02.
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Aug 4, 2009
#3
  • Aug 4, 2009
  • #3
Well I'm in a similar situation - bone stock car, needs exhaust. I picked the SLP catted X for a couple reasons.

1. It costs less than the Magnaflow catted X and is priced close to the Bassani aluminized pipe
2. True-X is supposed to be less raspy than the Bassani design
3. It's modular, and since I plan on doing SLP longtubes somewhere down the road, I'll save on not having to buy a shorty X pipe.

So... for me, it was a combo of price, sound, and most importantly - future plans. Good luck man!
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Aug 4, 2009
#4
  • Aug 4, 2009
  • #4
Power differences is minimal between the two designs (1-3HP). H-pipes offer more of a low rumble while X's usually offer a higher-tone scream.
 

0Trueblue2GT

New Member
May 31, 2009
7
0
0
Roanoke, VA
Aug 4, 2009
#5
  • Aug 4, 2009
  • #5
A friend of mine has a 2004 GT with similar mods as you and he has a magnaflow catback (not sure which series) with a MAC Pro-chamber and it sounds really good. I say go with a pro-chamber.
 

99nightmare

New Member
Apr 2, 2009
16
0
0
Aug 4, 2009
#6
  • Aug 4, 2009
  • #6
I have a Dr. Gas -pipe and I freaking LOVE IT! People comment on how much better mine sounds than theirs with the same exhaust (flowmasters) so I suggest a Dr. Gas X
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Aug 5, 2009
#7
  • Aug 5, 2009
  • #7
99nightmare said:
I have a Dr. Gas -pipe and I freaking LOVE IT! People comment on how much better mine sounds than theirs with the same exhaust (flowmasters) so I suggest a Dr. Gas X
Click to expand...

Out of curiosity, where did you purchase the X pipe? Do you happen to have any videos of the exhaust?
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Aug 5, 2009
#8
  • Aug 5, 2009
  • #8
Get the magnaflows with the magnaflow catted X. God do I love it!!!!! SMOOOOOTH.... not raspy.
I've had em 7 years. They get steadily louder over time. Mine are pretty darn loud now. Thank god I didnt buy the packs.

This clip is quite a few years old when they were new and MUCH quieter than they are now. I had stock headers back then too, maybe thats part of it. They don't rasp at all when the motor is under load.

YouTube - Daves Mustang Revving
 
9

95.0Stang

Member
Feb 20, 2003
538
1
18
Kansas
Aug 5, 2009
#9
  • Aug 5, 2009
  • #9
I appreciate all your comments and suggestions. I have decided to go with a MAC O/R H-pipe.

I listened to several clips on different sites and the H-pipe just seems to have the deep mellow tone I am looking for. I will miss those 2 precious HP...but I dont think they will matter much in the long run.

Once it's all installed I will try to post a sound clip or video for you guys to hear if you choose to.

Thanks again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Engine Throwing codes 94, 33, 34, 44, and sporadic engine shutoff.
  • Ryu
  • Oct 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
897
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2024
89ripper
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
P
Thoughts on this odd (smog legal) combo?
  • PJV9126
  • Feb 8, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2023
91AOD5.0LX
Bolt on exhaust system with factory manifolds and cats.
  • 5ltr7up
  • Feb 20, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 20, 2022
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?