• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Who's polished a trueflow pipe...and...

  • Thread starter Thread starter DMAN302
  • Start date Start date Nov 2, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last

Ozz

I think I have a problem here.
Founding Member
Jul 27, 2001
3,514
66
109
Canton, MI
Nov 3, 2006
#41
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #41
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
new york
Nov 3, 2006
#42
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #42
DMAN302 said:
I have aquired a trueflow C&L inlet pipe from one of stangnets finer members and will be installing it after I've completed polishing it. Question is who has attempted to polish a trueflow?...casting looks rough, but I imagine it can be done reasonably well. Second question is...who is running this pc with at pro-m 75 bullet MAF and stockbox? If you are, did you have any clearance issues?
Tanx.
D
Click to expand...

I polished a C&L true pipe. it took some time. i think it came out ok, not great. it does have lots of gritty bumps, although- i plan on re-sanding the entire pipe again. i used a dremel 80 grit roll to sand the entire pipe then started from there all the way to 320. actually-then used mothers aluminum polish on the dremel w/small buff and no white rouge. it still gleams and looks a million times better than powder coated. I can tell you this-i will be white rouging it this week, after i repolish my cobra upper with white rouge. I'll let you know how it comes.

Ant
 

ALMOST STOCK

Founding Member
Sep 23, 2000
1,250
41
88
CA.
Nov 3, 2006
#43
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #43
DMAN... I've never been a big fan of sanding as you well know and I'm not sure how rough the casting is on the C&L inlet pipe is, but I would consider this to be a fairly rough casting.
View attachment 427292

Anyway I sanded rough casting with 120 &150 grit sandpaper (nothing else) and then I move to a ventilated flap buffing wheel with emery compound on an electric drill and it ended up looking like this.
View attachment 427294

It’s far from being done no doubt, but for a rough sanding job before you actually start buffing and polishing a piece it’s a good start; I think.

It may or may not help you but I thought I’d throw my $.02 into the mix.
 

9350coupe

New Member
May 11, 2005
109
0
0
chicago
Nov 3, 2006
#44
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #44
ALMOST STOCK said:
DMAN... I've never been a big fan of sanding as you well know and I'm not sure how rough the casting is on the C&L inlet pipe is, but I would consider this to be a fairly rough casting.
View attachment 427274

Anyway I sanded rough casting with 120 &150 grit sandpaper (nothing else) and then I move to a ventilated flap buffing wheel with emery compound on an electric drill and it ended up looking like this.
View attachment 427276

It’s far from being done no doubt, but for a rough sanding job before you actually start buffing and polishing a piece it’s a good start; I think.

It may or may not help you but I thought I’d throw my $.02 into the mix.
Click to expand...

awesome work paul...............your the master
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Nov 3, 2006
#45
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #45
Sure does help Paul..my path to shine was going to be, hand sand quick 80 then step 120-180 then up as required. Much like you I don't see much after 320. I'm curious Paul as to the vented flap and emery, I was considering moving to a 2" quick lock med or fine scotch bright wheel (1/4 shank and a higher RPM grinder)..but the flap and emery is something I'm not familiar with. I assume this would not be the traditional abrasive bonded sandpaper type flap wheel (basically sandpaper strips bonded to a center spool)? Do you find the flap you mentioned gentle enough not to remove excessive amounts of material? My concearn is that the wheel would attempt to flatten the surface rather than assist in smoothing the circumferance.
 

ALMOST STOCK

Founding Member
Sep 23, 2000
1,250
41
88
CA.
Nov 3, 2006
#46
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #46
Derek
Basically the ventilated flap buffing is just another type of buffing wheel just like the Spiral Sewn, Loose Section, or Canton Flannel.
The big difference between the 4 different buffing wheels I’ve mention in reverse order are:

Canton Flannel: An extra soft wheel, recommended for all final coloring operations. This wheel will give you the most brilliant finish of all the buffs.

Loose Section: An extremely flexible wheel for color buffing. Gives very slight cutting action and is great for hard-to-reach surfaces.

Spiral Sewn: Well balanced long-wearing wheel for coarse buffing and cutting on all materials. Made from selected cotton material with continuous spiral sewing with 3/8" spacing.

Ventilated Flap:

View attachment 427186

For A Medium/Fast Cut On Contoured Hard or Soft Metals
The flap design of these Buffs keeps your work piece cooler, reducing the risk of warping. The flaps tend to "slap" the part, resulting in cutting action that is twice as fast as spiral sewn wheels.

Emery Compound: Contains Emery Grit - Very fast cutting action. For coarse buffing, removing scratches and burrs from iron and other hard metals.

So as you can see it’s not your traditional abrasive bonded sandpaper type flap wheel (basically sandpaper strips bonded to a center spool). It’s a buffing wheel that you actually apply emery compound to for fast cutting on different metals.
If you look in the pic I posted earlier you can see the Ventilated Flap on the drill.


By no means will the Ventilated Flap fatten the surface you’re working on unless you just want to do so. I’m one for saving any logos, #’s, or anything else I can versus sanding or buffing them off. To me that shows the difference between the guy who just wants to get things done, and the rest of us who are willing to spend the extra time to do it right.


I’m by no means saying it the right way or the only way to do a part, I just feel it speeds up the process of doing a part with minimal amount of sanding is all.
 

ALMOST STOCK

Founding Member
Sep 23, 2000
1,250
41
88
CA.
Nov 3, 2006
#47
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #47
9350coupe said:
awesome work paul...............your the master
Click to expand...

Thanks John.

I'm far from being a master though.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Nov 3, 2006
#48
  • Nov 3, 2006
  • #48
SO very helpfull..I have a few buff action wheels to add to my collection now. Thanks a always paul.
 

9350coupe

New Member
May 11, 2005
109
0
0
chicago
Nov 4, 2006
#49
  • Nov 4, 2006
  • #49
ALMOST STOCK said:
Thanks John.

I'm far from being a master though.
Click to expand...


ok,,,,but your dam good
 

stang22

Active Member
Jan 29, 2003
1,318
7
38
Washington, D.C.
Nov 5, 2006
#50
  • Nov 5, 2006
  • #50
ALMOST STOCK said:
DMAN... I've never been a big fan of sanding as you well know and I'm not sure how rough the casting is on the C&L inlet pipe is, but I would consider this to be a fairly rough casting.

Anyway I sanded rough casting with 120 &150 grit sandpaper (nothing else) and then I move to a ventilated flap buffing wheel with emery compound on an electric drill and it ended up looking like this.

It’s far from being done no doubt, but for a rough sanding job before you actually start buffing and polishing a piece it’s a good start; I think.

It may or may not help you but I thought I’d throw my $.02 into the mix.
Click to expand...

Paul, does this mean you are not going to be "ALMOST STOCK" anymore?

What other mods you doing? I looked around to see if I could find the cover for that intake, but no luck. Did you find one?

Tim
 
C

caseywan

Member
Apr 7, 2006
157
0
17
Chicago, IL
Nov 6, 2006
#51
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #51
Hey Amost Stock and Monso, have you guys ever used any of that greasless compound or aggressive material removal that Eastwood sells? I guess it's meant to be used with a buff and comes in 80, 120, 220, 320 grit.
 

Ozz

I think I have a problem here.
Founding Member
Jul 27, 2001
3,514
66
109
Canton, MI
Nov 6, 2006
#52
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #52
I haven't, sorry.
 

Blk91stang

Member
Jan 3, 2003
607
0
16
North Brunswick, NJ
Nov 6, 2006
#53
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #53
caseywan said:
Hey Amost Stock and Monso, have you guys ever used any of that greasless compound or aggressive material removal that Eastwood sells? I guess it's meant to be used with a buff and comes in 80, 120, 220, 320 grit.
Click to expand...

I have their polishing kit that comes with different grits including white rouge and tripoli. If I spent more time polishing, I'm sure its good. Otherwise I suck at it and dont have the patience to polish anything anymore.
 

ALMOST STOCK

Founding Member
Sep 23, 2000
1,250
41
88
CA.
Nov 6, 2006
#54
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #54
caseywan said:
Hey Amost Stock and Monso, have you guys ever used any of that greasless compound or aggressive material removal that Eastwood sells? I guess it's meant to be used with a buff and comes in 80, 120, 220, 320 grit.
Click to expand...

Yes I’ve tried the eastwood greaseless compounds before, actually 2 or 3 times for what it’s worth, but I wouldn’t use them again.
It seems to cut ok, the problem is if you get into a really tight area and try to get into a specific spot you usually end up digging a rounded groove do to the compound on buffing wheel in front of the spot you were trying to get to. Which just makes another spot (rounded or not) that you’ll need to address later.
The greaseless compound probably works for some people but it didn’t work for is all I’m saying.
 

ALMOST STOCK

Founding Member
Sep 23, 2000
1,250
41
88
CA.
Nov 6, 2006
#55
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #55
Tim, it will always be ALMOST STOCK no matter what I change, not that’s there’s much left to change anymore .
No I haven’t found a GT40 intake cover yet, and thanks for looking for the cover for me I really appreciate your help.
 

Ozz

I think I have a problem here.
Founding Member
Jul 27, 2001
3,514
66
109
Canton, MI
Nov 6, 2006
#56
  • Nov 6, 2006
  • #56
Hate to say it but I just let go of two of them

And it looks like I won't be using greaseless compound any time soon either.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Nov 7, 2006
#57
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #57
polish done...tired...several hours later.
View attachment 426364
 

Attachments

  • bamengine2.webp
    68.8 KB · Views: 89
  • bamengine1.webp
    68.8 KB · Views: 93

Dean85GT

New Member
Nov 27, 2004
502
1
0
Thorold, Ontario, Canada
Nov 7, 2006
#58
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #58
looks really good
 

Ozz

I think I have a problem here.
Founding Member
Jul 27, 2001
3,514
66
109
Canton, MI
Nov 7, 2006
#59
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #59
Much betta
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Nov 7, 2006
#60
  • Nov 7, 2006
  • #60
wow looks great. Almost need sunglasses to look at that engine.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
JCBeaver's 1993 GT Coyote Swap "The Never-Ending Project"
  • JCBeaver
  • Aug 13, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 8 9 10
Replies
182
Views
33K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2020
JCBeaver
C&l Intake Pipe
  • sen2two
  • Feb 16, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2014
srtthis
  • Locked
For Sale Vortech Polished SC-trim - 86-93 5.0
  • tunedin302
  • Oct 18, 2011
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
3
Views
4K
Engine and Power Adder Oct 30, 2011
tunedin302
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?