Explain why it is better, in your opinion, to get bolt ons for 30+ rwhp rather than a supercharger for 150+ rhwp.mogs01gt said:explain what? ask some questions and we will explain.
who ever said it was better? I was pointing out that your original post was incorrect on the numbers you listed.2002tj said:Explain why it is better, in your opinion, to get bolt ons for 30+ rwhp rather than a supercharger for 150+ rhwp.
Lots of people above are questioning my thoughts and calling this thread "worthless." You said I was so wrong, but only on teh numbers? So in principal you agree?mogs01gt said:who ever said it was better? I was pointing out that your original post was incorrect on the numbers you listed.
Its a person's own car and their own money, I say let them do what they want. Just dont **** it up and turn it into a ricer mobile.
I know you will find this diff to believe but this question has come up before2002tj said:Seriously, most people spend thousands on mufflers, midpipes, pulleys, throttle body, cams, etc., for what, a grand total of 25 rwhp if you are lucky? Might as well save your money and plop out teh $4k for a supercharger. Sure, it won't perform optimally until you get a few bolt ons, but teh 100+ rwhp gain will leave 99% of cars in teh dust. Am I missing something?
No I agree to let people do what they want with their cars. Just dont **** em up2002tj said:Lots of people above are questioning my thoughts and calling this thread "worthless." You said I was so wrong, but only on teh numbers? So in principal you agree?
Not to get into a large mechanical/engineering/ etc etc discussion, FI on our engines takes a great tuner to handle large amount of HP on the stock engines. N/A is more reliable usually.Why is n/a safer? You mean safer for the engine?
2002tj said:That is probably the highest I've seen for boltons, but I've only had my stang two months. How much you spend on all that?
Why does it enrage you? It's just a word, like any other.droptopponynj said:why do you keep typing TEH TEH TEH that is so fuggin annoying.
What teh f'k?droptopponynj said:why do you keep typing TEH TEH TEH that is so fuggin annoying.
Good analysis. Maybe you are right. Personally I am doing a coil-over suspension swap first, along with a shifter. Them probably teh Vortech.Q's Stang said:i like the way my exhaust sounds for starters...
wont a s/c be around 4.5k to 5k depending on make with the install and tune? kb 9 psi s/c's say they boost up 65% which would add anywhere from 139.xx-152.xx hp judging off a +/-10 hp interval on a solid stock 225 rwhp GT which would produce 354.xx-387.xx hp total if you play the numbers game...
im sure you would have more hp gains but id imagine that the cars would run close to the same investing 4.5k to 5k on bolt ons/suspension mods/tires b/c it would handle & shift better than a stock GT w/ just a s/c
2002tj said:Why does it enrage you? It's just a word, like any other.
2002tj said:Explain why it is better, in your opinion, to get bolt ons for 30+ rwhp rather than a supercharger for 150+ rhwp.
That is teh right choice, teh vortech is teh ****znit...2002tj said:Good analysis. Maybe you are right. Personally I am doing a coil-over suspension swap first, along with a shifter. Them probably teh Vortech.
navarro98gt said:Wow, this seems like a very touchy subject for some people. I don’t think the original poster is knocking you N/A guys, he’s just trying justify spending $$$ for not so impressive gains.
2002tj said:It seems there are more than a few here who are a little hurt over this question
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?