• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

windsor jr. heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarr300
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2007
C

cbarr300

Member
Jun 6, 2006
746
0
17
goose creek, SC
Apr 11, 2007
#1
  • Apr 11, 2007
  • #1
Anyone know how good these heads are? How about with a minor port and polish?

they have 180cc runners and a 58cc combustion chamber. the springs are dual 125# springs at 1.437"
The valves are 1.94 intake and 1.6 exhaust

thanks
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Apr 12, 2007
#2
  • Apr 12, 2007
  • #2
i think they are pretty small. from the 94-95 FAQ:
Lift ******** Intake ****** Exhaust
.100 ******* 54 ****** 47
.200 ******* 105 ****** 101
.300 ******* 141 ****** 125
.400 * ****** 170 ****** 140
.500 ******* 186 ****** 148
Avg Flow **** 131.2 **** 112.2
I/E Ratio **** 85.5%
Overstock *** 115.9% *** 132.9%
 

S351Saleen77

Member
Jun 27, 2002
423
0
16
Washington
Apr 12, 2007
#3
  • Apr 12, 2007
  • #3
Pro killer,
I think they flow better than what you are saying. Where did you get the info?

Here is a link to a head compare....it is with the older 171cc intake ports not the new 180's. They flowed 202cfm on the intake. The new 180's would flow better.

http://www.mindspring.com/~steveflyer/heads.htm


cbarr300,
If you get a good deal on them they would be o.k. for a 302. I see in your sig you want a stroker. I would not use these on a stroker.

I wouldn't buy them unless I got a great deal.
 
C

cbarr300

Member
Jun 6, 2006
746
0
17
goose creek, SC
Apr 12, 2007
#4
  • Apr 12, 2007
  • #4
That's on a different motor. I'm saving up for a dart based stroker...but til then I'm running my 302 on those heads (ported), a blower cam (but pretty good n/a), and my cobra intake with a port and polish.

Got the heads for free so I figured I might as well use them.

I looked at the faq in the tech section...but those numbers just don't seem right. I've seen other sources that say different....maybe I should just call World products lol.

Thanks..any more info would be great
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Apr 13, 2007
#5
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #5
i meant they would be too small for the 427 build that i thought he was getting them for.
 
C

cbarr300

Member
Jun 6, 2006
746
0
17
goose creek, SC
Apr 13, 2007
#6
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #6
haha, gotcha. I've gotta put the current combo in my sig. sorry about that
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
351
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
Cooling Jacket Pitting Idea's?
  • BoostedRed89gt
  • Aug 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
328
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 17, 2026
Mustang5L5
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
A
Old Holley head identification???
  • Ar15cobra
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
247
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?