• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Worn spark plugs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter reddy351
  • Start date Start date Oct 2, 2006

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
560
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Oct 2, 2006
#1
  • Oct 2, 2006
  • #1
Hey guys. I just got done swapping the plugs, wires, cap and rotor. I noticed that the plugs were open to about .058". I know that most guys run between .050 and .052. Would that much of a gap (and "burnt" electrodes) cause the car to ping at WOT? The electrodes actually looked really good, except for the excessively worn condition. The ground straps were chalky white. Nice! As a result of the excessive gap on the plugs, the cap and rotor both showed signs of tracing from excessive resistance. I guess 87k miles is too long to go to tune-up a Mustang. (Leave me alone, I "just" got it a year ago. )

I haven't had a chance to drive it, yet. I hope this means I can go back to 87 octane gas, for a while. (Just because that means the reason for the ping has been resolved and I can move forward to some upgrades.)
 

S/CBlack95GT

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
2,018
0
0
Tampa Palms, FL
Oct 2, 2006
#2
  • Oct 2, 2006
  • #2
.058" is pretty large. I dont know if it would cause the pinging but it is a possibility if the spark being produced is not sufficient. Gap them down to .050" and see how it runs.
 

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
560
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Oct 2, 2006
#3
  • Oct 2, 2006
  • #3
Looks like that solved the problem. I never thought old plugs would cause that sort of problem. I guess it's a good idea to cover the basics, huh?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Oct 3, 2006
#4
  • Oct 3, 2006
  • #4
Shaun is right-on. A healthy stock ignition should handle that gap without issue, but 100K+ mile ignition parts and some tarnish on the plug's electrode and ground strap can all add-up.

Personally, I leave room for error and run at 0.045- 0.048" to allow for fudge factor (I get hammered on the 5.0 Tech side for mentioning that I do this, for some reason. ). I see no issues however.

That all said, I've seen weaker ignitions than Ford's TFI (a fairly stout OEM ignition if you ask me) run at ~ 60% OVER the stock gap and not have noticable issues. That kind of gap will eventually reveal ignition weak points however.

Random ramblings.

Good luck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Spark Plugs Caused Rough Idle & Driving
  • firevert
  • Sep 1, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
515
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 3, 2025
Noobz347
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
573
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
W
New plugs, wires, dist cap and rotor, now randomly stalling
  • WhiskeyFoxTrot
  • Oct 12, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
656
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 15, 2024
WhiskeyFoxTrot
W
Fox Spark plugs
  • Mattjhop23
  • Jul 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 14, 2025
Reddevil91
P
Progress Thread New To Me 1988 GT - trying to set up vacuum lines for upper intake question
  • pindude80
  • May 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 9 10 11
Replies
214
Views
16K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 28, 2026
pindude80
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?